Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Bump nixpkgs #5110

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
openshift-ci merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2021
Merged

Bump nixpkgs #5110

openshift-ci merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2021
+77 −126

Conversation

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

@saschagrunert saschagrunert commented Jul 21, 2021

What type of PR is this?

/kind dependency-change

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Supersedes #4630

Special notes for your reviewer:

None

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 21, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. kind/dependency-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to changing dependencies labels Jul 21, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from rhatdan and sameo July 21, 2021 10:31
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 21, 2021
@saschagrunert saschagrunert mentioned this pull request Jul 21, 2021
Merged
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

saschagrunert commented Jul 21, 2021

@haircommander PTAL

@saschagrunert saschagrunert mentioned this pull request Jul 21, 2021
Closed
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

saschagrunert commented Jul 22, 2021

/assign @haircommander

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

saschagrunert commented Jul 22, 2021

/test all

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 22, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #5110 (95a0303) into master (5ab85f5) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5110   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   43.91%   43.91%           
=======================================
  Files         110      110           
  Lines       11453    11453           
=======================================
  Hits         5030     5030           
  Misses       5946     5946           
  Partials      477      477

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

saschagrunert commented Jul 23, 2021

/retest

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

saschagrunert commented Jul 26, 2021

/test integration_fedora

@saschagrunert
Bump nixpkgs
95a0303 
Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <[email protected]>
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

saschagrunert commented Jul 28, 2021

/retest

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

saschagrunert commented Jul 28, 2021

/test integration_crun

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

saschagrunert commented Aug 4, 2021

@haircommander PTAL this is required for the Kubernetes vendor update as well.

@haircommander
Copy link
Member

haircommander commented Aug 4, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 4, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Aug 4, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

saschagrunert commented Aug 4, 2021

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Aug 4, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Aug 4, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

saschagrunert commented Aug 4, 2021

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 4, 2021

@saschagrunert: Overrode contexts on behalf of saschagrunert: ci/prow/e2e-gcp

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 4, 2021 •
edited
Loading

@saschagrunert: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/openshift-jenkins/e2e_crun_cgroupv2 95a0303 link /test e2e_cgroupv2

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Aug 5, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

7 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Aug 5, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Aug 5, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Aug 5, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Aug 5, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Aug 5, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Aug 5, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

openshift-bot commented Aug 5, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit 226e658 into cri-o:master Aug 5, 2021
@saschagrunert saschagrunert deleted the nixpkgs branch August 5, 2021 07:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@mrunalp mrunalp Awaiting requested review from mrunalp

@runcom runcom Awaiting requested review from runcom

@rhatdan rhatdan Awaiting requested review from rhatdan

@sameo sameo Awaiting requested review from sameo

Assignees

@haircommander haircommander

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. kind/dependency-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to changing dependencies lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@saschagrunert @haircommander @openshift-bot