Readd layer image corruption test #6204
Conversation
|
CI seems to be broken in general :) |
ddaa90f to
81ad94f
Compare
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6204 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 43.68% 43.68%
=======================================
Files 122 122
Lines 13565 13565
=======================================
Hits 5926 5926
Misses 6999 6999
Partials 640 640 |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe, saschagrunert The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
LGTM assuming happy tests |
The test was originally introduced by testing via the PR: cri-o#5005 To avoid future regressions we now readd the test. Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <[email protected]>
81ad94f to
b1d17d0
Compare
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
|
@saschagrunert: The following test failed, say
DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
A friendly reminder that this PR had no activity for 30 days. |
|
@saschagrunert: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind ci
What this PR does / why we need it:
The test was originally introduced by testing via the PR: #5005
To avoid future regressions we now readd the test.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Refers to containers/storage#1322
Special notes for your reviewer:
None
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?