Fix copy constructor in SetVariableStatement #18101
Merged
+29
−1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change fixes the copy constructor of the
SetVariableStatementby adding there a call to the superclass copy constructor. Previously this constructor was using non-copy constructor of the superclass and thus was failing to copynamed_param_mapfield (and some other fields).When the
postgres_scannerextension is loaded the result of thePrepare()call for queries likeSET VARIABLE v = ?was gettng an emptynamed_param_mapfield and the execution of this statement was failing with:Testing: new test is added that uses
CanRequestRebind()API to check the code path on whichSQLStatement's copy constructor is invoked.Fixes: duckdb/duckdb-java#294