Refactor payout reminders to use Resend batch send #2541
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@devkiran has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 3 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe code refactors the payout reminder email process for partners by aggregating partner and program data, batching email sends using the Resend service, and updating reminder timestamps in bulk. The previous approach using individual email sends and a concurrency limiter is replaced with a more streamlined batch processing workflow. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant CronJob as Cron Payout Reminder Route
participant DB as Database
participant Resend as Resend Email Service
CronJob->>DB: Fetch partners with pending payouts
CronJob->>DB: Fetch program data
CronJob->>CronJob: Aggregate programs per partner
CronJob->>Resend: Send batch emails to partners
Resend-->>CronJob: Email send confirmation
CronJob->>DB: Bulk update connectPayoutsLastRemindedAt timestamps
CronJob-->>Client: Return "OK" JSON response
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/app/(ee)/api/cron/payouts/reminders/partners/route.ts (2)
132-133: Potential PII leakage in logs
console.log(partnerPrograms)outputs partner e-mails and payout amounts to the global log stream.
Replace with structured logging that redacts PII.-console.log(partnerPrograms); +await log({ + type: "debug", + message: `Preparing payout reminders for ${partnerPrograms.length} partners`, +});
162-162: Inconsistent success payload shapeWhen there is work to do we return
"OK"(string); when there is none we return an object{ success, message }.
Prefer a consistent JSON shape.-return NextResponse.json("OK"); +return NextResponse.json({ success: true, message: "OK" });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/web/app/(ee)/api/cron/payouts/reminders/partners/route.ts(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build
|
🤖 Bug0 QA Agent Here are the results of the automated tests for PR #2541:
To re-run the tests, please comment |
|
🤖 Bug0 QA Agent Here are the results of the automated tests for PR #2541:
To re-run the tests, please comment |
|
🤖 Bug0 QA Agent Here are the results of the automated tests for PR #2541:
To re-run the tests, please comment |
|
🤖 Bug0 QA Agent Here are the results of the automated tests for PR #2541:
To re-run the tests, please comment |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Chores