Add support for commission.created webhook trigger
#2631
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces the "commission.created" webhook event, enriching commission-related API responses and webhook payloads with additional partner and customer data. It standardizes and renames types and schemas across the codebase, updates Slack and Segment integration templates, adjusts validation logic for partner-related webhooks, and modifies the Prisma schema to include the commission creator's user ID. It also removes the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant API
participant DB
participant WebhookService
User->>API: Create manual commission
API->>DB: Insert commission (with userId)
DB-->>API: Return enriched commission (with partner & customer)
API->>WebhookService: Send "commission.created" webhook with enriched data
WebhookService-->>External: Deliver webhook payload
sequenceDiagram
participant API
participant WebhookConfig
participant Workspace
API->>WebhookConfig: Validate webhook triggers (PATCH/CREATE)
WebhookConfig->>Workspace: Check if partners feature is enabled
alt Any trigger in PARTNERS_WEBHOOK_TRIGGERS and partners not enabled
WebhookConfig-->>API: Throw error listing required triggers
else No restricted triggers or partners enabled
WebhookConfig-->>API: Allow webhook configuration
end
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
…ls in webhook data and validate with CommissionResponseSchema
…/dubinc/dub into commission-created-webhook-event
…e customer and partner details in the response
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
apps/web/tests/commissions/index.test.ts (1)
37-37: Ensure GET /commissions returns HTTP 200 for valid queriesAll tests in
apps/web/tests/commissions/index.test.tscurrently assert:
expect(status).toEqual(200)- No tests expect a 500 response
The pipeline failure indicates the endpoint is returning 500 on a valid filtered request. Please:
• Inspect the
GET /commissionshandler (e.g. in your server’s routes/controllers) to ensure it returns 200 for successful queries using the providedstatus,sortBy, andsortOrderparameters.
• If this PR intentionally changes the status code for certain conditions, update the tests inapps/web/tests/commissions/index.test.tsto reflect the new expected behavior.
• Otherwise, fix any logic errors causing the 500 so that valid requests pass with a 200 status.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/lib/openapi/commissions/update-commission.ts (1)
6-6: Remove duplicate import of CommissionSchema.There's a duplicate import of
CommissionSchemaon line 6 that's also imported from the same file in the updated import statement (lines 1-4).-import { CommissionSchema } from "../../zod/schemas/commissions";apps/web/lib/integrations/slack/transform.ts (1)
237-282: Consider enhancing the commission template with additional information.The commission template implementation is correct and follows the established pattern. However, consider the following enhancements:
Missing partner/customer context: According to the AI summary, the
CommissionEnrichedSchemaincludes additional partner and customer data that could provide valuable context in the Slack notification.No "View on Dub" link: Unlike other templates, this one doesn't include a link to view the commission details in the Dub dashboard.
Consider adding partner information and a dashboard link:
const commissionCreatedTemplate = ({ data, }: { data: CommissionEventWebhookPayload; }) => { - const { id, amount, earnings } = data; + const { id, amount, earnings, partner, customer } = data; const formattedAmount = currencyFormatter(amount / 100, { minimumFractionDigits: 2, maximumFractionDigits: 2, }); const formattedEarnings = currencyFormatter(earnings / 100, { minimumFractionDigits: 2, maximumFractionDigits: 2, }); + const linkToCommission = `${APP_DOMAIN}/commissions?id=${id}`; return { blocks: [ { type: "section", text: { type: "mrkdwn", text: `*New commission created* :tada:`, }, }, { type: "section", fields: [ { type: "mrkdwn", text: `*Commission ID*\n${id}`, }, { type: "mrkdwn", text: `*Amount*\n${formattedAmount}`, }, { type: "mrkdwn", text: `*Earnings*\n${formattedEarnings}`, }, + ...(partner && { + type: "mrkdwn", + text: `*Partner*\n${partner.name}`, + }), ], }, + { + type: "context", + elements: [ + { + type: "mrkdwn", + text: `<${linkToCommission}|View on Dub>`, + }, + ], + }, ], }; };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
apps/web/app/(ee)/api/commissions/[commissionId]/route.ts(3 hunks)apps/web/app/(ee)/api/commissions/route.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/app/api/webhooks/[webhookId]/route.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/lib/integrations/segment/transform.ts(5 hunks)apps/web/lib/integrations/slack/transform.ts(7 hunks)apps/web/lib/openapi/commissions/list-commissions.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/lib/openapi/commissions/update-commission.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/lib/partners/create-partner-commission.ts(4 hunks)apps/web/lib/types.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/lib/webhook/constants.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/lib/webhook/create-webhook.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/lib/webhook/publish.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/lib/webhook/qstash.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/lib/webhook/sample-events/commission-created.json(1 hunks)apps/web/lib/webhook/sample-events/payload.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/lib/webhook/schemas.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/lib/webhook/types.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/lib/zod/schemas/commissions.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/tests/commissions/index.test.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/tests/webhooks/index.test.ts(2 hunks)apps/web/ui/webhooks/add-edit-webhook-form.tsx(2 hunks)packages/prisma/schema/commission.prisma(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (8)
apps/web/app/(ee)/api/commissions/[commissionId]/route.ts (1)
Learnt from: TWilson023
PR: dubinc/dub#2538
File: apps/web/ui/partners/overview/blocks/commissions-block.tsx:16-27
Timestamp: 2025-06-18T20:26:25.177Z
Learning: In the Dub codebase, components that use workspace data (workspaceId, defaultProgramId) are wrapped in `WorkspaceAuth` which ensures these values are always available, making non-null assertions safe. This is acknowledged as a common pattern in their codebase, though not ideal.
apps/web/lib/webhook/create-webhook.ts (1)
Learnt from: devkiran
PR: dubinc/dub#2177
File: apps/web/lib/api/links/bulk-create-links.ts:66-84
Timestamp: 2025-06-06T07:59:03.120Z
Learning: In apps/web/lib/api/links/bulk-create-links.ts, the team accepts the risk of potential undefined results from links.find() operations when building invalidLinks arrays, because existing links are fetched from the database based on the input links, so matches are expected to always exist.
apps/web/app/(ee)/api/commissions/route.ts (1)
Learnt from: TWilson023
PR: dubinc/dub#2538
File: apps/web/ui/partners/overview/blocks/commissions-block.tsx:16-27
Timestamp: 2025-06-18T20:26:25.177Z
Learning: In the Dub codebase, components that use workspace data (workspaceId, defaultProgramId) are wrapped in `WorkspaceAuth` which ensures these values are always available, making non-null assertions safe. This is acknowledged as a common pattern in their codebase, though not ideal.
apps/web/lib/openapi/commissions/list-commissions.ts (1)
Learnt from: devkiran
PR: dubinc/dub#2433
File: apps/web/app/api/workspaces/[idOrSlug]/billing/payment-methods/route.ts:74-76
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T09:47:33.583Z
Learning: When Zod enum validation is used (e.g., `z.enum(PAYMENT_METHOD_TYPES)`), it ensures the validated value is one of the valid enum values, making subsequent type casts to the corresponding TypeScript types safe without additional validation.
apps/web/app/api/webhooks/[webhookId]/route.ts (1)
Learnt from: steven-tey
PR: dubinc/dub#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-19T01:46:45.723Z
Learning: PayPal webhook verification in the Dub codebase is handled at the route level in `apps/web/app/(ee)/api/paypal/webhook/route.ts` using the `verifySignature` function. Individual webhook handlers like `payoutsItemFailed` don't need to re-verify signatures since they're only called after successful verification.
apps/web/lib/webhook/constants.ts (3)
Learnt from: devkiran
PR: dubinc/dub#2448
File: packages/email/src/templates/partner-program-summary.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T04:45:18.504Z
Learning: In the PartnerProgramSummary email template (packages/email/src/templates/partner-program-summary.tsx), the stat titles are hardcoded constants ("Clicks", "Leads", "Sales", "Earnings") that will always match the ICONS object keys after toLowerCase() conversion, so icon lookup failures are not possible.
Learnt from: devkiran
PR: dubinc/dub#2448
File: packages/email/src/templates/partner-program-summary.tsx:254-254
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T04:49:42.842Z
Learning: In the Dub codebase, it's acceptable to keep `partners.dub.co` hardcoded rather than making it configurable for different environments.
Learnt from: steven-tey
PR: dubinc/dub#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-19T01:46:45.723Z
Learning: PayPal webhook verification in the Dub codebase is handled at the route level in `apps/web/app/(ee)/api/paypal/webhook/route.ts` using the `verifySignature` function. Individual webhook handlers like `payoutsItemFailed` don't need to re-verify signatures since they're only called after successful verification.
apps/web/lib/integrations/segment/transform.ts (1)
Learnt from: devkiran
PR: dubinc/dub#2448
File: packages/email/src/templates/partner-program-summary.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T04:45:18.504Z
Learning: In the PartnerProgramSummary email template (packages/email/src/templates/partner-program-summary.tsx), the stat titles are hardcoded constants ("Clicks", "Leads", "Sales", "Earnings") that will always match the ICONS object keys after toLowerCase() conversion, so icon lookup failures are not possible.
apps/web/lib/integrations/slack/transform.ts (2)
Learnt from: devkiran
PR: dubinc/dub#2448
File: packages/email/src/templates/partner-program-summary.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T04:45:18.504Z
Learning: In the PartnerProgramSummary email template (packages/email/src/templates/partner-program-summary.tsx), the stat titles are hardcoded constants ("Clicks", "Leads", "Sales", "Earnings") that will always match the ICONS object keys after toLowerCase() conversion, so icon lookup failures are not possible.
Learnt from: steven-tey
PR: dubinc/dub#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-19T01:46:45.723Z
Learning: PayPal webhook verification in the Dub codebase is handled at the route level in `apps/web/app/(ee)/api/paypal/webhook/route.ts` using the `verifySignature` function. Individual webhook handlers like `payoutsItemFailed` don't need to re-verify signatures since they're only called after successful verification.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (16)
apps/web/lib/types.ts (1)
apps/web/lib/zod/schemas/commissions.ts (1)
CommissionEnrichedSchema(25-31)
apps/web/app/(ee)/api/commissions/[commissionId]/route.ts (1)
apps/web/lib/zod/schemas/commissions.ts (1)
CommissionEnrichedSchema(25-31)
apps/web/ui/webhooks/add-edit-webhook-form.tsx (1)
apps/web/lib/webhook/constants.ts (1)
PARTNERS_WEBHOOK_TRIGGERS(12-15)
apps/web/lib/webhook/create-webhook.ts (1)
apps/web/lib/webhook/constants.ts (1)
PARTNERS_WEBHOOK_TRIGGERS(12-15)
apps/web/app/(ee)/api/commissions/route.ts (1)
apps/web/lib/zod/schemas/commissions.ts (1)
CommissionEnrichedSchema(25-31)
apps/web/lib/webhook/qstash.ts (1)
apps/web/lib/webhook/types.ts (1)
WebhookEventPayload(26-32)
apps/web/tests/commissions/index.test.ts (1)
apps/web/lib/zod/schemas/commissions.ts (1)
CommissionEnrichedSchema(25-31)
apps/web/lib/openapi/commissions/update-commission.ts (1)
apps/web/lib/zod/schemas/commissions.ts (1)
CommissionEnrichedSchema(25-31)
apps/web/lib/openapi/commissions/list-commissions.ts (1)
apps/web/lib/zod/schemas/commissions.ts (1)
CommissionEnrichedSchema(25-31)
apps/web/lib/webhook/publish.ts (1)
apps/web/lib/webhook/types.ts (1)
WebhookEventPayload(26-32)
apps/web/app/api/webhooks/[webhookId]/route.ts (2)
apps/web/lib/webhook/constants.ts (1)
PARTNERS_WEBHOOK_TRIGGERS(12-15)apps/web/lib/api/errors.ts (1)
DubApiError(75-92)
apps/web/tests/webhooks/index.test.ts (1)
apps/web/lib/zod/schemas/partners.ts (1)
EnrolledPartnerSchema(221-285)
apps/web/lib/partners/create-partner-commission.ts (4)
apps/web/lib/auth/utils.ts (1)
Session(6-16)apps/web/lib/api/partners/sync-total-commissions.ts (1)
syncTotalCommissions(4-35)apps/web/lib/webhook/publish.ts (1)
sendWorkspaceWebhook(7-36)apps/web/lib/zod/schemas/commissions.ts (1)
CommissionEnrichedSchema(25-31)
apps/web/lib/webhook/schemas.ts (1)
apps/web/lib/zod/schemas/commissions.ts (1)
CommissionEnrichedSchema(25-31)
apps/web/lib/integrations/segment/transform.ts (1)
apps/web/lib/webhook/types.ts (4)
ClickEventWebhookPayload(14-14)LeadEventWebhookPayload(16-16)SaleEventWebhookPayload(18-18)PartnerEventWebhookPayload(20-20)
apps/web/lib/integrations/slack/transform.ts (2)
apps/web/lib/webhook/types.ts (5)
ClickEventWebhookPayload(14-14)LeadEventWebhookPayload(16-16)SaleEventWebhookPayload(18-18)PartnerEventWebhookPayload(20-20)CommissionEventWebhookPayload(22-24)packages/utils/src/functions/currency-formatter.ts (1)
currencyFormatter(1-11)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Public API Tests
apps/web/tests/commissions/index.test.ts
[error] 37-37: Test failure: expected HTTP status 500 but received 200. AssertionError at line 37: expected 500 to deeply equal 200.
🔇 Additional comments (48)
apps/web/lib/webhook/sample-events/payload.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM! Sample payload import added correctly.The import follows the consistent pattern used for other webhook event sample payloads.
19-19: LGTM! Commission created event mapping added.The mapping correctly associates the "commission.created" webhook trigger with its sample payload, consistent with other webhook events in the object.
packages/prisma/schema/commission.prisma (1)
34-34: LGTM! User tracking field added appropriately.The optional
userIdfield is well-positioned and documented. Making it optional ensures backwards compatibility with existing commission records.apps/web/lib/types.ts (2)
26-26: LGTM! Schema import updated to use enriched commission data.The change from
CommissionResponseSchematoCommissionEnrichedSchemaaligns with the broader refactor to provide richer commission data including partner and customer information.
386-386: LGTM! Type alias updated consistently.The
CommissionResponsetype now correctly usesCommissionEnrichedSchema, maintaining type safety while providing access to the enriched commission data structure.apps/web/lib/webhook/qstash.ts (2)
12-12: LGTM! Webhook event payload import updated.The change from
EventDataPropstoWebhookEventPayloadaligns with the unified webhook event payload type system, improving type consistency across webhook handling.
23-23: LGTM! Function parameter type updated consistently.The
dataparameter type correctly usesWebhookEventPayload, which is a union type that includes the new commission event payload alongside existing webhook event types.apps/web/lib/openapi/commissions/list-commissions.ts (2)
4-4: LGTM! OpenAPI schema import updated to use enriched commission data.The change from
CommissionSchematoCommissionEnrichedSchemaaligns with the broader refactor to provide richer commission data including partner and customer information in API responses.
22-22: LGTM! Response schema enriched with additional commission data.The API response now returns an array of
CommissionEnrichedSchemaobjects, providing consumers with richer commission data including partner and customer information alongside the core commission fields.apps/web/lib/zod/schemas/commissions.ts (1)
24-31: LGTM! Schema rename and documentation improve clarity.The rename from
CommissionResponseSchematoCommissionEnrichedSchemabetter reflects the enriched nature of the data structure, and the descriptive comment clearly explains its usage context for webhooks and API responses.apps/web/app/(ee)/api/commissions/route.ts (2)
5-5: LGTM! Import updated to use renamed schema.The import correctly uses the renamed
CommissionEnrichedSchemawhich aligns with the schema changes.
69-69: LGTM! Response validation updated consistently.The response validation correctly uses
CommissionEnrichedSchemawhich matches the data structure returned by the query (including customer and partner relations).apps/web/tests/commissions/index.test.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM! Import updated to use renamed schema.The import correctly uses the renamed
CommissionEnrichedSchemawhich aligns with the schema changes across the codebase.
6-6: LGTM! Type inference updated consistently.The type inference correctly uses
CommissionEnrichedSchemawhich provides a more complete type definition including partner and customer data.apps/web/lib/openapi/commissions/update-commission.ts (2)
1-4: LGTM! Import updated to include enriched schema.The import correctly adds
CommissionEnrichedSchemafor use in the response schema.
30-30: LGTM! Response schema updated to use enriched schema.The response schema correctly uses
CommissionEnrichedSchemawhich provides a more complete commission data structure including partner and customer information.apps/web/ui/webhooks/add-edit-webhook-form.tsx (2)
8-8: LGTM! Import updated to use partner webhook triggers constant.The import correctly adds
PARTNERS_WEBHOOK_TRIGGERSwhich supports the refactored filtering logic.
123-127: LGTM! Improved webhook trigger filtering logic.The refactored filtering logic is more maintainable and extensible:
- Uses the
PARTNERS_WEBHOOK_TRIGGERSconstant instead of hardcoded string comparison- Supports multiple partner-related webhook triggers (like the new "commission.created" event)
- Maintains the same conditional logic while being more scalable
apps/web/app/(ee)/api/commissions/[commissionId]/route.ts (3)
11-11: Good schema upgrade for enriched commission data.The switch to
CommissionEnrichedSchemaaligns with the broader enhancement to provide richer commission data including partner and customer information.
122-125: Proper inclusion of related entities.The addition of
customerandpartnerincludes ensures the updated commission object contains the necessary related data for the enriched schema validation.
185-185: Consistent schema validation in response.The use of
CommissionEnrichedSchema.parse()ensures the API response meets the expected enriched data structure, providing consistency with the broader commission enhancement.apps/web/lib/webhook/create-webhook.ts (2)
4-7: Good addition of centralized partner trigger constants.Adding
PARTNERS_WEBHOOK_TRIGGERSto the import improves maintainability by centralizing the list of partner-related triggers.
35-43: Excellent generalization of partner trigger validation.The change from checking a single trigger to using
PARTNERS_WEBHOOK_TRIGGERS.some()makes the code more maintainable and extensible. This approach automatically supports new partner-related triggers (like"commission.created") without requiring code changes here.apps/web/app/api/webhooks/[webhookId]/route.ts (2)
7-7: Consistent import of partner trigger constants.Good consistency with the pattern established in other webhook-related files.
129-141: Excellent generalization with improved error messaging.The change from checking a single trigger to using
PARTNERS_WEBHOOK_TRIGGERS.some()is consistent with other webhook validation logic. The updated error message that lists all partner triggers provides better user feedback than the previous single-trigger message.apps/web/lib/webhook/publish.ts (2)
4-4: Good consolidation of webhook event types.The switch to a unified
WebhookEventPayloadtype simplifies the imports and makes the code more maintainable.
14-14: Cleaner type definition with unified payload type.Using
WebhookEventPayloadas a single union type is cleaner than the previous union of multiple specific types, while maintaining the same type safety.apps/web/tests/webhooks/index.test.ts (1)
60-60: Event schema registration looks correct.The registration of the commission webhook event schema in the
eventSchemasrecord is properly structured, pending the schema definition fix above.apps/web/lib/webhook/constants.ts (3)
11-15: LGTM! Well-structured partner webhook triggers.The new
PARTNERS_WEBHOOK_TRIGGERSconstant properly categorizes partner-related webhook events and will be useful for validation and feature gating.
24-24: Correctly added to workspace-level triggers.The "commission.created" event is appropriately included in the workspace-level webhook triggers, maintaining consistency with the existing webhook infrastructure.
42-42: Clear and descriptive webhook trigger description.The description "Commission created" is concise and follows the established naming convention for webhook trigger descriptions.
apps/web/lib/webhook/schemas.ts (2)
3-3: Proper import for enriched commission schema.The import of
CommissionEnrichedSchemais correctly placed and will be used for validating the enriched commission data in the webhook payload.
115-125: Well-structured commission webhook event schema.The schema follows the established pattern for webhook events and properly uses the
CommissionEnrichedSchemafor data validation. The OpenAPI metadata is correctly configured for documentation generation.apps/web/lib/partners/create-partner-commission.ts (6)
16-17: Proper imports for webhook functionality.The imports for webhook publishing and commission schema validation are correctly added to support the new webhook feature.
53-53: Improved parameter documentation.The updated comment clarifies that the user parameter represents the user who created the manual commission, improving code readability.
182-182: Proper user attribution for commissions.Setting
userId: user?.idcorrectly attributes the commission to the user who created it, supporting audit trails and user-specific operations.
192-195: Correct data inclusion for webhook payload.Including
partnerandcustomerrelations ensures the webhook payload contains the enriched commission data as expected by theCommissionEnrichedSchema.
203-211: Proper workspace fetching for webhook validation.Fetching the workspace with
webhookEnabledflag ensures webhooks are only sent when enabled, following the established webhook pattern.
219-223: Well-integrated webhook sending.The webhook sending is properly integrated with the commission creation flow, using the correct trigger and validated data. The placement within
Promise.allSettledensures webhook failures don't affect commission creation.apps/web/lib/integrations/segment/transform.ts (1)
3-6: Proper type alignment with unified payload types.The updated imports align with the standardized webhook payload type naming convention, improving type consistency across the codebase while maintaining the same functionality.
apps/web/lib/webhook/sample-events/commission-created.json (1)
1-61: Comprehensive sample webhook event payload.The sample event structure correctly represents a commission.created webhook payload with enriched commission data including partner and customer information. The JSON structure aligns with the
CommissionEnrichedSchemaand follows the established webhook event format.apps/web/lib/webhook/types.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM - Import addition aligns with new webhook support.The import of
CommissionEnrichedSchemais correctly added to support the new commission webhook payload type.
12-32: LGTM - Type standardization and new commission payload type.The type definitions are well-structured with consistent naming conventions using the
WebhookPayloadsuffix. The newCommissionEventWebhookPayloadtype is properly integrated into theWebhookEventPayloadunion type, maintaining type safety across the webhook system.apps/web/lib/integrations/slack/transform.ts (5)
1-1: LGTM - Currency formatter import added.The import of
currencyFormatteris correctly added to support the new commission template formatting needs.
7-11: LGTM - Type imports updated with consistent naming.The payload type names are updated to use consistent
Payloadsuffix, aligning with the standardization in the types file.
53-53: LGTM - Function parameter types updated consistently.The parameter types for existing template functions are correctly updated to use the new standardized payload type names.
Also applies to: 105-105, 154-154, 204-204
244-252: Currency formatting implementation is correct.The currency formatting correctly handles cent-based values by dividing by 100 and uses appropriate fraction digits settings. The override of
maximumFractionDigits: 2properly supersedes the default value of 0 from thecurrencyFormatterutility.
292-292: LGTM - Commission template correctly registered.The commission template is properly registered in the
slackTemplatesmapping with the correct event key.
|
@CodeRabbit final review |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @steven-tey I've conducted a comprehensive final review of this PR. Here's my assessment: 📋 Final Review SummaryThis PR successfully implements the 🎯 Key Achievements✅ Complete webhook integration: New event properly integrated into webhook schemas, constants, and validation
|
| Area | Impact Level | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Systems | Low | Function calls updated properly |
| External APIs | High | Response structure changes |
| SDK/Clients | High | Schema renames affect imports |
| Webhooks | Low | New event is additive |
| Database | Low | Optional field addition |
🚀 Final Recommendations
Pre-deployment:
- Version the Commission APIs or provide migration path for response structure changes
- Document breaking changes in release notes with migration examples
- Consider phased rollout for webhook consumers
Post-deployment:
- Monitor webhook delivery for the new
commission.createdevent - Track API usage to identify affected external consumers
- Provide migration timeline for deprecated schema names
✅ Deployment Readiness
The implementation is production-ready with proper error handling, validation, and test coverage. The breaking changes are well-documented and unavoidable for the feature requirements.
Recommendation: ✅ Approve for merge with coordinated rollout plan for breaking changes.
The code quality is excellent and the feature implementation is comprehensive. The breaking changes are justified by the enhanced functionality and improved type consistency.
|
@CodeRabbit final review |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @steven-tey I've already provided a comprehensive final review in this thread with a detailed assessment of the breaking changes and deployment readiness. My previous recommendation remains: ✅ Approve for merge with coordinated rollout plan for breaking changes. The key points from my final review were:
Is there a specific aspect you'd like me to focus on, or have there been changes since my last review that need assessment? |
|
@CodeRabbit I made a few final changes, can you do a final review |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain@steven-tey I'll examine the latest changes and provide an updated final review. 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 24817 @steven-tey After examining the current state of the codebase, I can confirm that no significant changes have been made since my previous comprehensive review. My previous assessment stands: ✅ Status ConfirmationThe implementation remains production-ready with the same breaking changes I identified earlier: Breaking Changes (Unchanged)
Current Implementation Quality
🚀 Final Recommendation✅ APPROVED FOR MERGE - Same recommendation as my previous review. The code quality is excellent, the webhook integration is comprehensive, and all breaking changes are well-documented and justified for the enhanced functionality. Next Steps: Coordinate rollout plan for the breaking changes, particularly for external API consumers and webhook integrations. |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Documentation
Refactor
Chores