Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@t-kameyama
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #5028

Copy link
Member

@BraisGabin BraisGabin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

val code = "val a = 0.plus(0)"

assertThat(rule.compileAndLint(code)).isEmpty()
assertThat(rule.lintWithContext(env, code)).isEmpty()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it possible to use compileLintWithContext in all this cases?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@BraisGabin BraisGabin added this to the 1.21.0 milestone Jul 5, 2022
@BraisGabin BraisGabin merged commit aa2a1bf into detekt:main Jul 5, 2022
@t-kameyama t-kameyama deleted the issue_5028 branch July 5, 2022 08:02
@TWiStErRob
Copy link
Member

Does this also fix import statements?

https://github.com/TWiStErRob/net.twisterrob.sun/security/code-scanning/275

@BraisGabin
Copy link
Member

That was fixed on other pr.

t-kameyama added a commit to t-kameyama/detekt that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

MaxChainedCallsOnSameLine reports fully-qualified class names

4 participants