Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@ebrondol
Copy link

@ebrondol ebrondol commented Nov 17, 2022

Replay Request

Requestor
Erica Brondolin (as ORM)

Describe the configuration

  • Release: 12_4_11_patch1
  • Run: 359762, 361468, 361971
  • GTs:
    • expressGlobalTag: 124X_dataRun3_Express_v9
    • promptrecoGlobalTag: 124X_dataRun3_Prompt_v10
    • alcap0GlobalTag: 124X_dataRun3_Prompt_v10
  • Additional changes: None

Purpose of the test
Test the new CMSSW_12_4_11_patch1 release in view of the change in the T0 configuration.

T0 Operations cmsTalk thread
CMS Talk

@cmsdmwmbot
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@ebrondol
Copy link
Author

The replay contains three runs to test all the fixes:

@germanfgv @jhonatanamado Will the replay take too long or could it be fine?

@germanfgv
Copy link
Contributor

@ebrondol this is way too big. 361971 and 361468 are 0.5PB of data. We can have a replay for 359762, which is a good pp run with all components in, as a general test.

We can also have reduced replays with the bigger runs, in which we only process the affected stream.

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor

@ebrondol this is way too big. 361971 and 361468 are 0.5PB of data. We can have a replay for 359762, which is a good pp run with all components in, as a general test.

We can also have reduced replays with the bigger runs, in which we only process the affected stream.

Looks like a good proposal to me!

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

Is it possible to include the specific events that failed for these patches? I imagine not, so I guess we should just mention here any private tests that checked them.

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor

test syntax please

@francescobrivio
Copy link
Contributor

@germanfgv CMSSW_12_4_11_patch1 is available on cvmfs:
/cvmfs/cms.cern.ch/el8_amd64_gcc10/cms/cmssw-patch/CMSSW_12_4_11_patch1

Can we start the replay(s) you mentioned above?

@ebrondol ebrondol changed the title WIP: Replay Replay for 12_4_11_patch1 Nov 18, 2022
@germanfgv
Copy link
Contributor

@ebrondol
Copy link
Author

hi @germanfgv , if I see the grafana plots correctly, the replay with 359762 is going well.
Are we waiting for it to completely finished before testing the runs with problems or we could start them already now?

@germanfgv
Copy link
Contributor

germanfgv commented Nov 19, 2022

@ebrondol about the other replays:
I started the 361971 replay at the same time. It already finished successfully. Here you can see the monitoring:
https://monit-grafana.cern.ch/d/t_jr45h7k/cms-tier0-replayid-monitoring?orgId=11&var-Bin=5m&var-ReplayID=221118104713&var-JobType=All&var-WorkflowType=All

I also tried to start the replay with 361468, but discovered that we no longer have the streamers. Checking the deletion logs, it looks like we added the run to the exclusion list a bit too late. This means we cannot test this with replay, but we'll have relay on the tests done with the job's Pset.

@germanfgv
Copy link
Contributor

After the successful test, this was merged into production here #4784

@germanfgv germanfgv closed this Nov 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants