Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@alexcb
Copy link
Contributor

@alexcb alexcb commented Jun 14, 2024

This test was passing should-fail=true rather than should_fail=true; however it's not clear what this test was doing as earthly was passing so changing the argument to should_fail=true then causes this test to fail (since earthly was not failing).

There was also a test-fails target, which was never used anywhere. Ironically this target was also passing, so it wasn't a matter of simply changing

DO --pass-args +RUN_EARTHLY_ARGS --target=/the-test+test --should-fail=true

to

DO --pass-args +RUN_EARTHLY_ARGS --target=/the-test+test-fails --should_fail=true

Alex Couture-Beil added 2 commits June 14, 2024 10:14
This test was passing `should-fail=true` rather than `should_fail=true`;
however it's not clear what this test was doing as earthly was passing
so changing the argument to `should_fail=true` then causes this test to
fail (since earthly was not failing).

There was also a `test-fails` target, which was never used anywhere.
Ironically this target was also passing, so it wasn't a matter of simply
changing

    DO --pass-args +RUN_EARTHLY_ARGS --target=/the-test+test --should-fail=true

to

    DO --pass-args +RUN_EARTHLY_ARGS --target=/the-test+test-fails --should_fail=true

Signed-off-by: Alex Couture-Beil <[email protected]>
This is very similar to 40f42e3

Signed-off-by: Alex Couture-Beil <[email protected]>
@alexcb alexcb force-pushed the acb/remove-invalid-locally-in-command-test branch from 2cd3d88 to 306dc65 Compare June 14, 2024 17:28
@alexcb alexcb marked this pull request as ready for review June 14, 2024 18:54
@alexcb alexcb requested a review from a team as a code owner June 14, 2024 18:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: In Progress

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants