Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@ekmixon
Copy link
Owner

@ekmixon ekmixon commented Mar 12, 2025

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 8 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • N6Portal/gui/package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-LODASH-567746
Β Β 731Β Β 
medium severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-9292519
Β Β 703Β Β 
high severity Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-LODASH-6139239
Β Β 696Β Β 
high severity Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-LODASH-608086
Β Β 686Β Β 
high severity Code Injection
SNYK-JS-LODASH-1040724
Β Β 681Β Β 
medium severity Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
SNYK-JS-INFLIGHT-6095116
Β Β 631Β Β 
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-LODASH-1018905
Β Β 586Β Β 
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-MINIMATCH-3050818
Β Β 479Β Β 

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
πŸ“œ Customise PR templates
πŸ›  Adjust project settings
πŸ“š Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

πŸ¦‰ Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
πŸ¦‰ Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
πŸ¦‰ Code Injection
πŸ¦‰ More lessons are available in Snyk Learn

Summary by Sourcery

Upgrade npm dependencies in 'N6Portal/gui/package.json' to fix 8 vulnerabilities, including issues related to Prototype Pollution, Code Injection, SSRF, and ReDoS.

Bug Fixes:

  • Upgrade 'axios' to version 1.8.2 to fix a Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.
  • Upgrade 'lodash' to address multiple Prototype Pollution and Code Injection vulnerabilities.
  • Upgrade 'inflight' to fix a Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime vulnerability.
  • Upgrade 'minimatch' to fix a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability.

@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Mar 12, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request addresses 8 vulnerabilities by upgrading specific npm dependencies in the package.json file. The changes involve updating the versions of axios, portfinder, and shelljs to mitigate security risks.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Upgrade npm dependencies to fix vulnerabilities.
  • Updated axios from version 0.19.0 to 1.8.2 to address a Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.
  • Updated portfinder from version 1.0.26 to 1.0.34 to fix a Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime vulnerability.
  • Updated shelljs from version 0.7.6 to 0.9.0 to mitigate a Code Injection vulnerability.
N6Portal/gui/package.json

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@secure-code-warrior-for-github

Micro-Learning Topic: Regular expression denial of service (Detected by phrase)

Matched on "Regular Expression Denial of Service"

What is this? (2min video)

Denial of Service (DoS) attacks caused by Regular Expression which causes the system to hang or cause them to work very slowly when attacker sends a well-crafted input(exponentially related to input size).Denial of service attacks significantly degrade the service quality experienced by legitimate users. These attacks introduce large response delays, excessive losses, and service interruptions, resulting in direct impact on availability.

Try a challenge in Secure Code Warrior

Micro-Learning Topic: Code injection (Detected by phrase)

Matched on "Code Injection"

What is this? (2min video)

Code injection happens when an application insecurely accepts input that is subsequently used in a dynamic code evaluation call. If insufficient validation or sanitisation is performed on the input, specially crafted inputs may be able to alter the syntax of the evaluated code and thus alter execution. In a worst case scenario, an attacker could run arbitrary code in the server context and thus perform almost any action on the application server.

Try a challenge in Secure Code Warrior

Helpful references

Micro-Learning Topic: Denial of service (Detected by phrase)

Matched on "Denial of Service"

The Denial of Service (DoS) attack is focused on making a resource (site, application, server) unavailable for the purpose it was designed. There are many ways to make a service unavailable for legitimate users by manipulating network packets, programming, logical, or resources handling vulnerabilities, among others. Source: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Denial_of_Service

Try a challenge in Secure Code Warrior

Micro-Learning Topic: Prototype pollution (Detected by phrase)

Matched on "Prototype Pollution"

What is this? (2min video)

By adding or modifying attributes of an object prototype, it is possible to create attributes that exist on every object, or replace critical attributes with malicious ones. This can be problematic if the software depends on existence or non-existence of certain attributes, or uses pre-defined attributes of object prototype (such as hasOwnProperty, toString or valueOf).

Try a challenge in Secure Code Warrior

Micro-Learning Topic: Server-side request forgery (Detected by phrase)

Matched on "Server-side Request Forgery"

What is this? (2min video)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities are caused when an attacker can supply or modify a URL that reads or sends data to the server. The attacker can create a malicious request with a manipulated URL, when this request reaches the server, the server-side code executes the exploit URL causing the attacker to be able to read data from services that shouldn't be exposed.

Try a challenge in Secure Code Warrior

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. Here's why:

  • It seems to have been created by a bot ('[Snyk]' found in title). We assume it knows what it's doing!
  • We don't review packaging changes - Let us know if you'd like us to change this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants