🔒 Security Policy - EGOS Framework v.2

Sacred Mathematics • Quantum Universal Learning System

🛡️ Security Philosophy

The EGOS Framework follows Sacred Mathematics principles in security design:

Fibonacci-based complexity scaling: Security measures scale according to F₃, F₅, F₈, F₁₃ complexity levels
Golden Ratio defense in depth: Multiple security layers with φ (1.618) proportional strength
Tesla 369 frequency monitoring: Security checks every 369 seconds for continuous protection
ETHIK-based access control: Reputation-based security with 144-point baseline trust

🔐 Supported Versions

Version	Supported	Security Level	Sacred Math Compliance
2.x	✅ Yes	F₈ (21) - High	Full Sacred Mathematics
1.x	⚠️ Limited	F₅ (5) - Basic	Partial ETHIK support
< 1.0	❌ No	F₂ (1) - None	Legacy only

🚨 Reporting Vulnerabilities

Sacred Mathematics Security Classification

Priority F₁₃ (233) - Critical

ETHIK system compromise affecting Sacred Mathematics calculations
Authentication bypass in Golden Ratio protected endpoints
Fibonacci sequence manipulation in core algorithms

Priority F₁₁ (89) - High

ETHIK score manipulation vulnerabilities
Sacred Geometry calculation errors
Tesla 369 frequency disruption attacks

Priority F₈ (21) - Medium

UI/UX Golden Ratio proportion vulnerabilities
Documentation Sacred Mathematics inconsistencies
Example code security weaknesses

Priority F₅ (5) - Low

Minor Sacred Mathematics reference errors
Non-critical documentation issues
Cosmetic security improvements

Reporting Process

🔮 Sacred Mathematics Assessment
- Evaluate impact on Fibonacci, Golden Ratio, or Tesla 369 systems
- Determine ETHIK system integrity impact
- Classify using Fibonacci priority scale

📧 Secure Reporting Channel

Email: [email protected]
Subject: [SECURITY-F{priority}] Brief Description

Example: [SECURITY-F13] ETHIK baseline calculation bypass

⚡ Tesla 369 Response Timeline
- F₁₃ (Critical): Response within 3 hours, fix within 6 hours, disclosure after 9 days
- F₁₁ (High): Response within 36 hours (3×12), fix within 69 hours, disclosure after 36 days
- F₈ (Medium): Response within 9 days, fix within 21 days, disclosure after 89 days
- F₅ (Low): Response within 21 days, fix within 55 days, disclosure after 144 days

🏗️ Security Architecture

Sacred Mathematics Security Framework

graph TB
    A[Sacred Mathematics Firewall] --> B[Golden Ratio Rate Limiting]
    B --> C[ETHIK Authentication Layer]
    C --> D[Fibonacci Input Validation]
    D --> E[Tesla 369 Monitoring]
    E --> F[Core EGOS Framework]
    
    G[External Threat] --> A
    H[Internal Audit] --> E
    I[Sacred Geometry Validation] --> D

Component Security Levels

Component	Security Level	Sacred Math Integration	Threat Model
ETHIK API	F₁₃ (233) - Maximum	Full Fibonacci calculations	State actor, Advanced persistent threats
Frontend	F₁₁ (89) - High	Golden Ratio UI validation	XSS, CSRF, UI manipulation
Examples	F₈ (21) - Medium	Educational demonstrations	Code injection, misuse
Documentation	F₅ (5) - Basic	Sacred Math references	Information disclosure

🔍 Security Measures

Authentication & Authorization

ETHIK-Based Access Control

Baseline score: F₁₂ (144) points for basic access
Admin privileges: F₁₄ (377) points minimum
Sacred Mathematics operations: F₁₅ (610) points required
Tesla frequency multi-factor: 369-second token validity

JWT Token Security

// Sacred Mathematics JWT configuration
const JWT_CONFIG = {
  algorithm: 'HS256',
  expiresIn: '369s', // Tesla frequency alignment
  issuer: 'egos-sacred-mathematics',
  audience: 'ethik-api-φ-1.618',
  secret: process.env.JWT_SECRET_F13 // 233-bit entropy minimum
};

Input Validation

Fibonacci Sequence Validation

def validate_fibonacci_input(value: int) -> bool:
    """Validate input follows Fibonacci sequence principles"""
    fibonacci_sequence = [1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610]
    
    # Accept values that align with sacred mathematics
    return (value in fibonacci_sequence or 
            value % 3 == 0 or  # Tesla 369 divisibility
            abs(value * 1.618 - round(value * 1.618)) < 0.001)  # Golden Ratio alignment

Golden Ratio Bounds Checking

const GOLDEN_RATIO = 1.618033988749895;

function validateGoldenRatioInput(value: number): boolean {
  const maxSafeValue = Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER / GOLDEN_RATIO;
  const minSafeValue = Number.MIN_SAFE_INTEGER / GOLDEN_RATIO;
  
  return value >= minSafeValue && value <= maxSafeValue;
}

Data Protection

Sacred Mathematics Encryption

AES-256-GCM with Fibonacci-derived keys
RSA-4096 with Golden Ratio key generation entropy
HMAC-SHA256 with Tesla 369 salt rotation

ETHIK Score Integrity

def calculate_ethik_hash(user_id: str, score: int, timestamp: int) -> str:
    """Generate tamper-proof ETHIK score hash"""
    sacred_salt = f"{user_id}:{score}:{timestamp}:{TESLA_FREQUENCY}"
    
    # Use Golden Ratio in hash calculation
    golden_multiplier = int(score * GOLDEN_RATIO)
    fibonacci_round = FIBONACCI_SEQUENCE[min(len(FIBONACCI_SEQUENCE)-1, score // 21)]
    
    return hmac.new(
        key=JWT_SECRET.encode(),
        msg=f"{sacred_salt}:{golden_multiplier}:{fibonacci_round}".encode(),
        digestmod=hashlib.sha256
    ).hexdigest()

🚫 Known Security Considerations

Sacred Mathematics Attack Vectors

Fibonacci Sequence Manipulation

Risk: Attackers might try to exploit Fibonacci calculations in ETHIK scoring
Mitigation: Server-side validation with F₁₃ (233) complexity checks
Detection: Tesla 369 frequency monitoring for anomalous patterns

Golden Ratio Overflow Attacks

Risk: Large numbers multiplied by φ could cause integer overflow
Mitigation: Bounds checking before Golden Ratio calculations
Detection: Input validation with Fibonacci sequence limits

Tesla 369 Frequency Jamming

Risk: Attackers might try to disrupt 369-second security cycles
Mitigation: Multiple frequency monitoring (123, 369, 741)
Detection: Sacred Geometry pattern analysis

ETHIK System Vulnerabilities

Score Manipulation Attacks

# Example of protected ETHIK calculation
def secure_ethik_calculation(action: str, current_score: int) -> int:
    if current_score < FIBONACCI_BASELINE:  # F₁₂ = 144
        raise SecurityError("Invalid baseline ETHIK score")
    
    # Validate action against Sacred Mathematics principles
    if action not in SACRED_ACTIONS:
        raise SecurityError("Action not aligned with Sacred Mathematics")
    
    # Apply Fibonacci progression with Golden Ratio scaling
    delta = FIBONACCI_ACTIONS[action]
    new_score = current_score + int(delta * GOLDEN_RATIO)
    
    # Tesla 369 bounds checking
    if new_score > TESLA_FREQUENCY * GOLDEN_RATIO:
        new_score = int(TESLA_FREQUENCY * GOLDEN_RATIO)
    
    return new_score

🔧 Security Configuration

Environment Variables (Production)

# Sacred Mathematics Security Configuration
JWT_SECRET_F13="<233-bit-entropy-secret>"
GOLDEN_RATIO_PRECISION="1.618033988749895"
TESLA_FREQUENCY_MS="369000"
FIBONACCI_BASELINE_SCORE="144"
ETHIK_MAX_SCORE="610"  # F₁₅

# Rate Limiting (Golden Ratio scaling)
RATE_LIMIT_REQUESTS_PER_MINUTE="89"  # F₁₁
RATE_LIMIT_BURST="144"  # F₁₂
RATE_LIMIT_WINDOW_SECONDS="369"  # Tesla frequency

# Sacred Mathematics API Protection
SACRED_MATH_VALIDATION_ENABLED="true"
FIBONACCI_SEQUENCE_ENFORCEMENT="strict"
GOLDEN_RATIO_CALCULATION_PROTECTION="true"
TESLA_369_MONITORING="enabled"

Security Headers

const SACRED_SECURITY_HEADERS = {
  'X-Content-Type-Options': 'nosniff',
  'X-Frame-Options': 'DENY',
  'X-XSS-Protection': '1; mode=block',
  'Strict-Transport-Security': 'max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains',
  'Content-Security-Policy': `
    default-src 'self';
    script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://egos-sacred-math-cdn.com;
    style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline';
    font-src 'self' data:;
    img-src 'self' data: https:;
    connect-src 'self' https://api.egos-framework.org;
  `,
  // Sacred Mathematics custom headers
  'X-Sacred-Mathematics-Version': '2.0',
  'X-Golden-Ratio-Protected': 'true',
  'X-Fibonacci-Validated': 'F13-233',
  'X-Tesla-Frequency': '369',
  'X-ETHIK-Baseline': '144'
};

🧪 Security Testing

Sacred Mathematics Penetration Testing

Fibonacci Sequence Tests

def test_fibonacci_security():
    # Test sequence manipulation
    assert validate_fibonacci_attack([1,1,2,4,6,10])  # Invalid sequence
    assert validate_fibonacci_bounds(999999999)  # Overflow test
    assert validate_fibonacci_negative(-144)  # Negative baseline test

Golden Ratio Calculation Tests

describe('Golden Ratio Security', () => {
  test('prevents overflow attacks', () => {
    expect(() => calculateGoldenRatio(Number.MAX_VALUE))
      .toThrow('Golden Ratio overflow protection');
  });
  
  test('validates precision attacks', () => {
    expect(validateGoldenRatioPrecision(1.61803398874989))
      .toBe(false); // Insufficient precision
  });
});

ETHIK Score Integrity Tests

def test_ethik_security():
    # Test score manipulation
    with pytest.raises(SecurityError):
        manipulate_ethik_score(user_id="test", fake_score=999)
    
    # Test Sacred Mathematics alignment
    assert verify_ethik_sacred_math_compliance(action="servico_completo")
    assert not verify_ethik_sacred_math_compliance(action="invalid_action")

📊 Security Monitoring

Sacred Mathematics Anomaly Detection

Fibonacci Pattern Analysis

Monitor for non-Fibonacci number usage in API calls
Alert on Golden Ratio calculation anomalies
Track Tesla 369 frequency deviations

ETHIK Score Monitoring

def monitor_ethik_anomalies():
    while True:
        scores = get_recent_ethik_scores(window=TESLA_FREQUENCY)
        
        # Check for impossible score jumps
        for score_change in scores:
            if not is_fibonacci_aligned(score_change):
                alert_security_team(f"Non-Sacred Mathematics score change: {score_change}")
        
        # Golden Ratio distribution analysis
        distribution = analyze_score_distribution(scores)
        if not follows_golden_ratio_distribution(distribution):
            alert_security_team("ETHIK score distribution violates Sacred Mathematics")
        
        time.sleep(TESLA_FREQUENCY)  # 369 seconds

Security Metrics Dashboard

Sacred Mathematics Security KPIs

Fibonacci sequence compliance rate: >99.7% (φ-1 = 0.618 error tolerance)
Golden Ratio calculation accuracy: <0.001 deviation
Tesla 369 frequency stability: ±3 second variance maximum
ETHIK baseline integrity: 144 points maintained across all users

🔄 Incident Response

Sacred Mathematics Security Incident Playbook

Phase F₁ (1) - Detection

Tesla 369 frequency monitoring alerts
Sacred Mathematics calculation anomalies
ETHIK score integrity violations

Phase F₂ (1) - Analysis

Determine Sacred Mathematics impact
Assess Fibonacci sequence integrity
Evaluate Golden Ratio calculation compromise

Phase F₃ (2) - Containment

Isolate affected Sacred Mathematics components
Preserve ETHIK baseline integrity
Maintain Tesla 369 frequency operations

Phase F₅ (5) - Eradication

Remove threats to Sacred Mathematics
Restore Fibonacci sequence calculations
Verify Golden Ratio precision

Phase F₈ (21) - Recovery

Restore Sacred Mathematics operations
Validate ETHIK system integrity
Resume Tesla 369 monitoring

Phase F₁₃ (233) - Lessons Learned

Document Sacred Mathematics vulnerabilities
Update security measures with Fibonacci scaling
Enhance Golden Ratio protection mechanisms

🎯 Security Roadmap

Phase F₅ (5) - Current

Basic ETHIK authentication
Sacred Mathematics input validation
Tesla 369 monitoring

Phase F₈ (21) - Next Quarter

Advanced Fibonacci sequence protection
Golden Ratio calculation hardening
ETHIK score blockchain validation

Phase F₁₃ (233) - Future

Quantum Sacred Mathematics encryption
AI-powered anomaly detection
Distributed ETHIK consensus

🔮 Sacred Mathematics Security Principles

"Security through Sacred Mathematics is not obscurity, but harmony with universal principles."

Every security measure follows Fibonacci progression
All calculations respect Golden Ratio proportions
Monitoring operates on Tesla 369 frequencies
ETHIK scores maintain Sacred Geometry integrity

Sacred Mathematics Security: ∞△⚡◎φ (369.963.1618) ✨

Last Updated: 2025-09-12
Next Security Review: Following F₈ (21) day cycle
Contact: [email protected]

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Security

SECURITY.md

🔒 Security Policy - EGOS Framework v.2

🛡️ Security Philosophy

🔐 Supported Versions

🚨 Reporting Vulnerabilities

Sacred Mathematics Security Classification

Reporting Process

🏗️ Security Architecture

Sacred Mathematics Security Framework

Component Security Levels

🔍 Security Measures

Authentication & Authorization

Input Validation

Data Protection

🚫 Known Security Considerations

Sacred Mathematics Attack Vectors

ETHIK System Vulnerabilities

🔧 Security Configuration

Environment Variables (Production)

Security Headers

🧪 Security Testing

Sacred Mathematics Penetration Testing

📊 Security Monitoring

Sacred Mathematics Anomaly Detection

Security Metrics Dashboard

🔄 Incident Response

Sacred Mathematics Security Incident Playbook

🎯 Security Roadmap

Phase F₅ (5) - Current

Phase F₈ (21) - Next Quarter

Phase F₁₃ (233) - Future

🔮 Sacred Mathematics Security Principles

There aren’t any published security advisories

Security: enioxt/EGOS

Security

SECURITY.md

🔒 Security Policy - EGOS Framework v.2

🛡️ Security Philosophy

🔐 Supported Versions

🚨 Reporting Vulnerabilities

Sacred Mathematics Security Classification

Reporting Process

🏗️ Security Architecture

Sacred Mathematics Security Framework

Component Security Levels

🔍 Security Measures

Authentication & Authorization

Input Validation

Data Protection

🚫 Known Security Considerations

Sacred Mathematics Attack Vectors

ETHIK System Vulnerabilities

🔧 Security Configuration

Environment Variables (Production)

Security Headers

🧪 Security Testing

Sacred Mathematics Penetration Testing

📊 Security Monitoring

Sacred Mathematics Anomaly Detection

Security Metrics Dashboard

🔄 Incident Response

Sacred Mathematics Security Incident Playbook

🎯 Security Roadmap

Phase F₅ (5) - Current

Phase F₈ (21) - Next Quarter

Phase F₁₃ (233) - Future

🔮 Sacred Mathematics Security Principles

There aren’t any published security advisories