Loans improve #6048
Merged
Loans improve #6048
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Reviewer's GuideThis PR overhauls the Polaris sync implementation for savings and loans by refactoring backend utilities to standardize model resolution and sync logging, introducing strict payload validation, exposing new transaction endpoints in the GraphQL API, updating CLI commands, and enhancing the UI with dedicated transaction tabs and details. Sequence Diagram for new 'sendSavingAmount' GraphQL MutationsequenceDiagram
actor User
participant GraphQLServer as GraphQL Server
participant sendSavingAmountResolver as sendSavingAmount Resolver
participant getConfig as getConfig
participant incomeSavingFunc as incomeSaving()
User->>GraphQLServer: Mutation: sendSavingAmount(data)
GraphQLServer->>sendSavingAmountResolver: resolve(data)
sendSavingAmountResolver->>getConfig: getConfig(subdomain, "POLARIS", {})
getConfig-->>sendSavingAmountResolver: polarisConfig
alt polarisConfig.token exists
sendSavingAmountResolver->>incomeSavingFunc: incomeSaving(subdomain, polarisConfig, data)
incomeSavingFunc-->>sendSavingAmountResolver: undefined (No Polaris call made)
else Token not found
sendSavingAmountResolver-->>GraphQLServer: Error: POLARIS config not found
end
sendSavingAmountResolver-->>GraphQLServer: "success" / Error
Sequence Diagram for Refactored 'incomeSaving' UtilitysequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant IS as incomeSaving()
participant GM as generateModels()
participant SL as SyncLogs.syncLogsAdd()
participant GC as getContract()
participant GetCust as getCustomer()
participant CFO as customFieldToObject()
participant GDA as getDepositAccount()
Client->>IS: incomeSaving(subdomain, polarisConfig, params)
IS->>GM: generateModels(subdomain)
GM-->>IS: models
IS->>IS: Create syncLogDoc
IS->>SL: models.SyncLogs.syncLogsAdd(syncLogDoc)
SL-->>IS: syncLog
IS->>GC: getContract(subdomain, params.contractId, 'savings')
GC-->>IS: savingContract
alt savingContract.forDefPos == '1'
IS->>Client: return incomeDeposit(...)
end
IS->>GetCust: getCustomer(subdomain, params.customerId)
GetCust-->>IS: customer
IS->>CFO: customFieldToObject(subdomain, 'core:customer', customer)
CFO-->>IS: customerData
IS->>GDA: getDepositAccount(subdomain, params.customerId)
GDA-->>IS: depositAccount
IS->>IS: Prepare sendData payload
Note right of IS: sendData includes hardcoded txnAcntCode='300021000045', txnAmount=6500.
Note right of IS: fetchPolaris() call is commented out in the PR.
IS-->>Client: undefined (transaction not returned as fetchPolaris is out)
Sequence Diagram for new 'sendLoanAmount' GraphQL MutationsequenceDiagram
actor User
participant GraphQLServer as GraphQL Server
participant sendLoanAmountResolver as sendLoanAmount Resolver
participant getConfig as getConfig
participant createLoanGiveFunc as createLoanGive()
participant FP as fetchPolaris()
User->>GraphQLServer: Mutation: sendLoanAmount(data)
GraphQLServer->>sendLoanAmountResolver: resolve(data)
sendLoanAmountResolver->>getConfig: getConfig(subdomain, "POLARIS", {})
getConfig-->>sendLoanAmountResolver: polarisConfig
alt polarisConfig.token exists
sendLoanAmountResolver->>createLoanGiveFunc: createLoanGive(subdomain, polarisConfig, data)
createLoanGiveFunc->>FP: fetchPolaris(op: '13610262', ...)
FP-->>createLoanGiveFunc: polarisResponse
createLoanGiveFunc-->>sendLoanAmountResolver: polarisResponse
else Token not found
sendLoanAmountResolver-->>GraphQLServer: Error: POLARIS config not found
end
sendLoanAmountResolver-->>GraphQLServer: "success" / Error
Sequence Diagram for Refactored 'createLoanGive' UtilitysequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant CLG as createLoanGive()
participant GM as generateModels()
participant SL as SyncLogs.syncLogsAdd()
participant GC as getContract()
participant GetCust as getCustomer()
participant CFO as customFieldToObject()
participant GDA as getDepositAccount()
participant FP as fetchPolaris()
Client->>CLG: createLoanGive(subdomain, polarisConfig, transaction)
CLG->>GM: generateModels(subdomain)
GM-->>CLG: models
CLG->>CLG: Create syncLogDoc
CLG->>SL: models.SyncLogs.syncLogsAdd(syncLogDoc)
SL-->>CLG: syncLog
CLG->>GC: getContract(subdomain, { _id: transaction.contractId }, 'loans')
GC-->>CLG: loanContract
CLG->>GetCust: getCustomer(subdomain, loanContract.customerId)
GetCust-->>CLG: customer
CLG->>CFO: customFieldToObject(subdomain, 'core:customer', customer)
CFO-->>CLG: customerData
CLG->>GDA: getDepositAccount(subdomain, loanContract.customerId)
GDA-->>CLG: depositAccount
CLG->>CLG: Prepare loanGive payload (IPolarisLoanGive)
CLG->>FP: fetchPolaris(op: '13610262', data: [loanGive], ...)
FP-->>CLG: loanGiveResponse
CLG-->>Client: loanGiveResponse
Class Diagram for Updated Polaris Backend Data TypesclassDiagram
class IPolarisSaving {
+prodCode: string
+slevel: number
+capMethod: string
+acntCode: string
+startDate: string
+maturityOption: string
+brchCode: string
+curCode: string
+name: string
+name2: string
+termLen: number
+tenor: number
+custCode: string
+jointOrSingle: string
+openDateOrg: string
+maturityDate: Date
}
note for IPolarisSaving "Renamed from IPolarisDeposit, fields adjusted."
class IPolarisUpdateSaving {
+operCode: string
+acntCode: string
+name: string
+prodCode: string
+brchCode: string
+curCode: string
+custCode: string
+startDate: string
+maturityDate: Date
+tenor: number
+capMethod: string
+slevel: number
+termLen: number
+maturityOption: string
}
note for IPolarisUpdateSaving "Renamed from IPolarisUpdateDeposit, fields significantly changed."
class IPolarisLoan {
+custCode: string
+name: string
+prodCode: string
+purpose: string
+subPurpose: string
+curCode: string
+approvAmount: number
+approvDate: Date
+startDate: Date
+endDate: Date
+termLen: number
}
note for IPolarisLoan "Field types for approvDate, startDate, endDate changed to Date. termLen type to number. loanDestination removed."
class IPolarisUpdateLoan {
<<New>>
+acntCode: string
+custCode: string
+name: string
+prodCode: string
+purpose: string
+subPurpose: string
+approvAmount: number
+approvDate: Date
+startDate: Date
+endDate: Date
+termLen: number
+repayAcntSysNo: number
}
class IPolarisLoanGive{
+txnAcntCode: string
+txnAmount: number
+contAcntCode: string
+contAmount: number
+txnDesc: string
+tcustName: string
+tcustRegister: string
}
Class Diagram for GraphQL Schema Changes (Mutations and Queries)classDiagram
class GraphQLMutations {
<<New>> +sendSavingAmount(data: JSON): String
<<New>> +sendLoanAmount(data: JSON): String
}
GraphQLMutations ..> incomeSaving : calls
GraphQLMutations ..> createLoanGive : calls
class GraphQLQueries {
+getPolarisData(method: String, data: JSON): JSON
note "A new 'method' option 'getSavingDetail' is now supported."
}
GraphQLQueries ..> getSavingDetail_utility : calls when method is 'getSavingDetail'
class incomeSaving {
note "Called by sendSavingAmount mutation"
}
class createLoanGive {
note "Called by sendLoanAmount mutation"
}
class getSavingDetail_utility {
note "Utility function to fetch saving details from Polaris (op: getSavingDetail)"
}
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed everything up to 533b562 in 2 minutes and 16 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
1953lines of code in34files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
11draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/saving/types.ts:14
- Draft comment:
The interface IPolarisSaving defines 'termLen' as a string, yet in update functions it is used like a number. Ensure type consistency between saving contract duration and its type. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
2. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/saving/createSavingMessage.ts:159
- Draft comment:
Using JSON.parse on 'savingCode' may throw an exception if the response is not valid JSON. Consider adding error handling or validating the format of savingCode. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
3. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/savingPolaris/containers/Transaction.tsx:48
- Draft comment:
The refetchQueries call uses an 'include' array with 'syncSavingsData'. Ensure the query name matches the one defined in your GraphQL queries to avoid typos and unintended behavior. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
4. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/saving/updateSaving.ts:119
- Draft comment:
Hard-coded op code '13610286' is used in the fetchPolaris call. Consider defining such op codes as constants for better maintainability and clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
5. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/loan/createLoanMessage.ts:75
- Draft comment:
Consider refactoring and centralizing hard-coded op codes (like '13619000', '13610253', etc.) into constants. This would improve maintainability and readability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
6. packages/plugin-savings-ui/src/contracts/graphql/queries.ts:147
- Draft comment:
Typo notice: Please double-check whether 'savingTransactionHistory' should be 'savingsTransactionHistory' to keep naming consistent with the module's context and other fields. If this is intentional, please disregard. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The field name likely comes from a GraphQL schema that's defined elsewhere. The inconsistency exists but changing it would require schema changes. This seems more like a style preference than a real issue. The code will work fine either way. The comment is asking for verification rather than pointing out a clear problem. The inconsistent naming could indicate an actual schema design issue that should be fixed. Consistent naming can prevent bugs and improve maintainability. While consistency is good, this comment is asking for verification ("Please double-check") rather than definitively pointing out an issue. It's the kind of speculative comment our rules say to avoid. Delete the comment. It's asking for verification rather than pointing out a clear issue, and the inconsistency, while real, isn't severe enough to warrant a comment.
7. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/loan/createLoanMessage.ts:99
- Draft comment:
Typo alert: It looks like in the new code, 'new Date(endDate)' might be a mistake. Should this be 'new Date(loan.endDate)' to match the original intent? - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The change appears intentional and part of a larger refactor. The code now gets a system date and calculates the end date based on duration, rather than using a predefined end date. This is a valid approach and may be preferred for consistency. The comment seems to misunderstand that this is an intentional change in behavior. I could be wrong about the intentionality - maybe this is actually a bug. The old behavior using loan.endDate might have been correct. The systematic calculation of endDate from systemDate + duration seems more robust than using a predefined endDate. The change is consistent with other changes like using systemDate for startDate and approvDate. The comment should be deleted as it appears to misunderstand an intentional change in how end dates are calculated.
8. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/loan/createLoanMessage.ts:101
- Draft comment:
Typo alert: The property name 'IsGetBrchFromOutside' uses an unexpected uppercase letter. Consider changing it to 'isGetBrchFromOutside' for consistency with the other lowerCamelCase keys. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
9. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/loan/loanGive.ts:72
- Draft comment:
Typo: variable name "loanGiveReponse" may be a typographical error. Consider renaming it to "loanGiveResponse". - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
10. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/saving/types.ts:5
- Draft comment:
The property name 'capAcntCode' on line 5 might be a typographical error. Should it be 'capAcctCode' (with a double 'c') for consistency and clarity? Please double-check. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
11. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/savingPolaris/components/Transaction/TransactionHistories.tsx:7
- Draft comment:
Potential typo: The import name 'ScrollTableColls' might be intended to be 'ScrollTableCols'. Please verify if this is correct. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The import comes from a local styles file that we can't see. The component name could be intentionally named with "Colls". Without seeing the source file, we can't verify if this is actually a typo. Making assumptions about naming without full context could lead to unnecessary changes. The name does look unusual and could be a legitimate typo that should be fixed. Not raising potential typos could lead to maintaining incorrect names in the codebase. However, per the rules, we should not make speculative comments or comments that require more context to verify. We would need to see the styles file to confirm if this is actually a typo. Delete the comment since we cannot verify if this is actually a typo without seeing the styles file, and speculative comments should be avoided.
Workflow ID: wflow_M1DjX6DUIzETyKr3
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
| `; | ||
|
|
||
| const syncSavingTransactions = ` | ||
| mutation depositContractActive($contractNumber: String!) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The mutation syncSavingTransactions is defined identically to depositContractActive. Verify this is intentional; otherwise, use the correct operation for syncing saving transactions.
| } | ||
| console.log(sendData, 'sendData'); | ||
|
|
||
| // if (savingContract?.number && params?.total != null) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is a block of commented-out code (lines 76-85). Consider removing or clarifying its purpose to improve code clarity.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed 23d943a in 2 minutes and 40 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
522lines of code in12files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
7draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/plugin-savings-api/src/messageBroker.ts:129
- Draft comment:
Consider adding error handling or logging in the 'savings:transactions.update' consumer to handle updateOne failures consistently. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The comment suggests adding error handling, but this seems inconsistent with the codebase patterns. The RPC queue infrastructure likely handles errors already. Other similar consumers don't have explicit error handling. Adding error handling here would create inconsistency. The comment also doesn't specify what kind of error handling would be useful. Maybe there are specific error cases for transactions that need special handling that don't apply to other entities. The comment could be identifying a real risk. Without specific evidence of transaction-specific error cases, and given the consistent pattern across the codebase, adding error handling here would be an unnecessary deviation. Delete the comment. It suggests deviating from established patterns without clear justification.
2. packages/plugin-savings-ui/src/transactions/types.ts:24
- Draft comment:
Use lowercase 'boolean' for the isSyncedTransaction type for consistency across interfaces. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
3. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/loan/createLoanMessage.ts:141
- Draft comment:
Ensure that startDate and endDate are correctly formatted and timezone-adjusted when updating the contract. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the author to ensure that thestartDateandendDateare correctly formatted and timezone-adjusted. This is a general request for confirmation and does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue in the code. It violates the rule against asking the author to ensure behavior is intended.
4. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/savingPolaris/components/Transaction/TransactionHistories.tsx:35
- Draft comment:
Table header in TransactionHistories does not match the displayed content; consider updating the header (e.g., use 'Status' instead of 'Date') to reflect sync status. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
5. packages/plugin-savings-api/src/models/definitions/transactions.ts:106
- Draft comment:
Typo: The label "Is Synced transaction" has inconsistent capitalization compared to the other labels. Consider changing it to "isSyncedTransaction" or "Is Synced Transaction" for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment is technically correct about inconsistency, there's already widespread inconsistency throughout the file. Making this single label consistent wouldn't improve the overall situation. This seems like a larger styling issue that would need to be addressed across the entire file, not just for this one new field. The comment doesn't add significant value. The inconsistent capitalization could cause confusion in UI or documentation. Maybe standardizing even one field is a step in the right direction? Fixing just one field when there are many inconsistent ones could actually make the code more confusing by suggesting there is a standard when there isn't. This needs a larger cleanup effort. Delete the comment. While technically correct, fixing this single label's capitalization wouldn't meaningfully improve code quality given the widespread inconsistency throughout the file.
6. packages/plugin-savings-ui/src/transactions/types.ts:24
- Draft comment:
In the new propertyisSyncedTransaction?: Boolean;, consider using the primitiveboolean(lowercase) instead ofBooleanfor consistency with the other primitive types in this file. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
7. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/savingPolaris/components/Transaction/TransactionHistories.tsx:30
- Draft comment:
Typo notice: 'ScrollTableColls' might be a typographical error. Did you mean 'ScrollTableCols'? - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_15565ip1NvYmwTre
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
| externalBankName?: string; | ||
| ownBankNumber?: string; | ||
| ownBankType?: string; | ||
| isSyncedTransaction?: Boolean; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Prefer using lowercase boolean instead of Boolean in TypeScript interfaces for isSyncedTransaction for type consistency.
Suggested change
| isSyncedTransaction?: Boolean; | |
| isSyncedTransaction?: boolean; |
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return transaction; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Returning from the loop in incomeSaving may skip processing subsequent transactions; consider processing all items or accumulating results.
| const onHandlePolaris = () => | ||
| confirm(__("Are you sure you want to activate Savings?")) | ||
| .then(() => { | ||
| if (contract.isDeposit) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The if-else block in onHandlePolaris is redundant as both branches call sentTransaction(transactions); simplify the logic.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed 5a57ee8 in 1 minute and 39 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
381lines of code in8files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
5draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/graphql/resolvers/mutations/savings.ts:57
- Draft comment:
Consider adding error handling (e.g., try/catch) in the new sendDepositAmount resolver for consistency and to avoid unhandled promise rejections. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The comment suggests adding error handling that doesn't exist in any of the other similar methods. This would actually make the new method inconsistent with the established pattern. GraphQL resolvers often let errors propagate up to be handled by the GraphQL error handling middleware. There's no evidence that the current approach is problematic. Maybe there's a good reason to add error handling that I'm not seeing. Perhaps the incomeDeposit function has different error characteristics than the other utility functions. Without seeing evidence that incomeDeposit needs special error handling, we should maintain consistency with the established pattern in the codebase. Delete the comment. Adding try/catch would make this method inconsistent with others, and there's no evidence it's needed.
2. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/saving/incomeSaving.ts:105
- Draft comment:
The 'return transaction' inside the for-loop will exit after processing the first item. If multiple transactions are expected, consider accumulating results or moving the return outside the loop. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
3. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/savingPolaris/containers/Transaction.tsx:40
- Draft comment:
The mutation hook for depositTransaction is typed as SavingTransactionMutationResponse. To improve type safety, consider using the dedicated DepositTransactionMutationResponse type. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The comment suggests using a type that isn't visible in the codebase context we have. While it's possible this type exists somewhere else, we don't have strong evidence for that. The existing SavingTransactionMutationResponse type is already being used for a similar mutation (savingTransaction) and could be the correct type to use here. Without seeing the actual types or mutation responses, we can't be confident this suggestion is correct. The comment could be correct - maybe there is a DepositTransactionMutationResponse type defined elsewhere that would be more appropriate. The similar but distinct mutation names (sync[Deposit/Saving]Transactions) hint at potentially different response types. However, without seeing the type definitions or mutation responses, we don't have strong evidence that this change is necessary or correct. The existing code could be intentionally reusing the same response type. Delete this comment since we don't have strong evidence that the suggested type exists or would be more appropriate than the current type.
4. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/savingPolaris/containers/Transaction.tsx:61
- Draft comment:
Typo: The function name 'sentDepositTransactionHandler' might be a typo. It appears that it was intended to be 'sendDepositTransactionHandler' for clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The naming pattern is inconsistent (sent vs send), but both names are valid English and convey similar meaning. The function works correctly regardless of its name. This seems like a minor stylistic issue that doesn't impact functionality. The comment is technically about changed code but feels nitpicky. The inconsistency between 'sent' and 'send' could indicate a broader pattern issue in the codebase. The prop name 'sendDepositTr' uses 'send' which could support the comment's suggestion. While there is an inconsistency, the function name is clear enough and the code works correctly. This is a minor stylistic issue that doesn't warrant a comment. Delete the comment. The function name is clear enough and the inconsistency is too minor to require a change.
5. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/savingPolaris/containers/Transaction.tsx:85
- Draft comment:
Typographical note: The property name 'sendDepositTr' might be inconsistent with the naming convention used for 'sentTransaction'. Consider if it should be 'sentDepositTransaction' (or something similar) for clarity and consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment identifies a real inconsistency, our rules state we should only keep comments that require clear code changes. Naming inconsistencies, while not ideal, are more of a style/readability issue. The code will function correctly regardless. The comment is also somewhat speculative with "might be" and "consider if". The inconsistent naming could lead to confusion for developers maintaining the code in the future. It violates the principle of least surprise. While naming consistency is good practice, this isn't a critical issue that absolutely requires changing. The code will work correctly either way, and our rules specifically say to avoid purely informative comments. Given our strict rules about only keeping comments that require clear code changes, this style-focused comment should be removed despite being technically correct.
Workflow ID: wflow_CQ4Opmmxiz7eZ7fb
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
| 'savings' | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| return deposit; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Returning inside the for-loop causes early termination; only the first non-synced transaction is processed. Consider processing all transactions or accumulating responses.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 7ebd3c3 in 1 minute and 21 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
155lines of code in3files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/plugin-savings-api/src/models/definitions/transactions.ts:68
- Draft comment:
Consider using a function (e.g. () => new Date()) for the default value of payDate so that each new document gets the current timestamp rather than reusing the same Date instance. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
2. packages/plugin-savings-api/src/models/definitions/transactions.ts:95
- Draft comment:
The label for storeReaction is identical to contractReaction. Verify if this is intentional or if storeReaction should have a distinct label. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
3. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/savingPolaris/components/Transaction/Transaction.tsx:24
- Draft comment:
The confirmation message was updated to 'Are you sure you want to send transactions?'. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended user action and that any related documentation is updated. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
4. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/savingPolaris/components/Transaction/Transaction.tsx:14
- Draft comment:
Consider renaming the 'sentTransaction' callback to something like 'sendTransaction' for consistency with 'sendDepositTr' and clearer action semantics. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
Workflow ID: wflow_LVsxaHiYFg4cO0zq
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 6395983 in 1 minute and 6 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
85lines of code in4files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
5draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/savingPolaris/components/Transaction/Transaction.tsx:1
- Draft comment:
Good update: Import now includes both Box and Table from '@erxes/ui/src', ensuring that the Table component used later is available. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/savingPolaris/components/Transaction/Transaction.tsx:47
- Draft comment:
Simplified renderCell by removing the unnecessary React fragment. The direct return of DidAmount improves clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
3. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/savingPolaris/components/Transaction/TransactionHistories.tsx:1
- Draft comment:
Consolidated style and UI component imports (Box and Table) to reduce redundancy. This streamlines the import section. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
4. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/savingPolaris/containers/Transaction.tsx:9
- Draft comment:
Apollo hooks imports (useQuery, useMutation) have been consolidated into a single line, removing duplicate imports and improving maintainability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
5. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/savingPolaris/containers/TransactionHistories.tsx:8
- Draft comment:
The TransactionHistories container now correctly imports the corresponding component and handles the loading state with a Spinner. The import and prop passing are consistent. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_I7jg8LNTp9Wq5HOZ
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 3fbb2f2 in 2 minutes and 2 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
57lines of code in3files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/loan/loanGive.ts:55
- Draft comment:
Switching from '||' to '??' changes fallback behavior (empty strings won't trigger defaults). Confirm this is intended for fields like txnDesc and tcustName. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% This comment violates several rules. It's asking for confirmation ("Confirm this is intended...") which we explicitly shouldn't do. It's speculative about potential issues rather than pointing out a definite problem. The change from || to ?? is a deliberate change that the author made across multiple fields consistently, suggesting it was intentional. The behavior change is real and could have significant implications if these fields are used in important business logic. Maybe this deserves attention. While the behavior change is real, the consistent application across multiple fields suggests this was a deliberate choice. If it were incorrect, it would likely be caught in testing since these are core loan details. Delete the comment. It violates our rules by asking for confirmation and being speculative, rather than pointing out a definite issue.
2. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/saving/incomeSaving.ts:66
- Draft comment:
Using '??' instead of '||' alters fallback behavior — empty strings are now accepted. Verify that txnAcntCode, txnDesc, and tcustRegister handle falsy values as expected. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment is technically correct that ?? and || behave differently with empty strings, this appears to be an intentional change to improve the handling of falsy values. The code provides default values ('', 'shiljuuleg', '') which suggests empty strings are acceptable. The API call doesn't show any validation requirements that would make empty strings problematic. The comment raises a valid technical point about different operator behavior. Maybe there are API requirements we can't see that make empty strings invalid? The code's structure and default values strongly suggest empty strings are valid. If empty strings weren't allowed, the defaults themselves would be invalid. This comment should be deleted as it's asking for verification without strong evidence of an actual issue, and appears to be questioning an intentional improvement in null handling.
3. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/savingPolaris/components/Transaction/TransactionHistories.tsx:8
- Draft comment:
Removed the unused 'contract' prop from the Props type. Ensure no dependent component relies on it. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_aDtou0i2XYEghI7S
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed 3569cdd in 1 minute and 48 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
81lines of code in5files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
6draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/deposit/createDeposit.ts:48
- Draft comment:
Condition updated to include deposit.isSyncedPolaris. Confirm that deposit.isSyncedPolaris is a boolean flag and that this check meets business expectations. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to confirm the type and business logic of a condition. This violates the rule against asking the author to confirm their intention or ensure behavior is intended. The comment does not provide a specific code suggestion or ask for a test to be written.
2. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/loan/createLoanMessage.ts:51
- Draft comment:
Condition now checks loan.isSyncedPolaris alongside preSuccessValue. Verify that loan.isSyncedPolaris is consistently defined and used correctly. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to verify the consistency and correctness of the usage ofloan.isSyncedPolaris. This falls under asking the author to double-check or ensure something, which is against the rules. The comment does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue, making it not useful according to the guidelines.
3. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/saving/createSavingMessage.ts:54
- Draft comment:
The condition now includes savingContract.isSyncedPolaris. Ensure that this flag is reliably set to a boolean and that its inclusion behaves as expected. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to ensure that a flag is reliably set and behaves as expected. This falls under the category of asking the author to double-check or ensure behavior, which is against the rules. Therefore, this comment should be removed.
4. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/savingPolaris/components/Transaction/TransactionHistories.tsx:5
- Draft comment:
Removed import of IContractDoc for being unused. This is a clean-up and improves code clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
5. packages/plugin-savings-api/src/graphql/resolvers/queries/contracts.ts:351
- Draft comment:
Typo: The error message "cant find account" is missing an apostrophe. Consider using "can't find account". - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
6. packages/plugin-savings-api/src/graphql/resolvers/queries/contracts.ts:355
- Draft comment:
Typo: The error message "this account has not customer" is grammatically awkward. Consider rephrasing to "this account does not have a customer". - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_N8m1axLahCQrvLdr
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
| return { | ||
| list: await paginate( | ||
| models.Contracts.find(filter).sort(sortBuilder(params)), | ||
| models.Contracts.find(filter).sort( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The new sort call passes two objects to .sort(). Mongoose expects a single sort object. Merge the sort criteria (e.g., combine { createdAt: -1 } with sortBuilder(params)) to ensure proper sorting.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed bc20ded in 2 minutes and 23 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
1004lines of code in19files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
8draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/loan/createLoanMessage.ts:85
- Draft comment:
Potential bug: Using 'systemDate.tenor' instead of 'loan.tenor' when setting endDate. Ensure the correct variable is used for month offset. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
2. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/loan/loanGive.ts:12
- Draft comment:
Ensure the 'transaction' parameter is non-empty before accessing transaction[0] to avoid runtime errors. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50% This is a valid concern about potential runtime errors. The code makes heavy use of transaction[0] without checks. However, the comment asks to "ensure" something rather than making a clear suggestion. It also doesn't specify what exactly should be done - throw an error? Return early? Additionally, we don't know the contract of this function - maybe transaction is guaranteed to be non-empty by the caller. I might be too harsh on the "ensure" phrasing - the underlying suggestion for validation is sound. Also, even if callers guarantee non-empty arrays, defensive programming could still be valuable. While the core suggestion is valid, the comment's phrasing violates our rules by asking to "ensure" something rather than making a clear, actionable suggestion. A better comment would directly suggest adding specific validation code. Delete this comment because it violates the rule against asking authors to "ensure" things. A better comment would specifically suggest addingif (!transaction?.length) throw new Error('Transaction array cannot be empty');at the start of the function.
3. packages/plugin-loans-api/src/models/definitions/transactions.ts:218
- Draft comment:
Typographical comment: The label 'Is Synced transaction' might be intended to have consistent capitalization, e.g., 'Is Synced Transaction'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The comment is about a purely cosmetic issue. While consistency in naming is good, this is a label string that likely only appears in internal/debug contexts. The inconsistency doesn't affect functionality. Looking at other labels in the file, there's no clear standard being followed anyway. This feels like unnecessary nitpicking. The comment does point out a real inconsistency, and consistent naming conventions can make code more maintainable. Maybe establishing a standard here could help future development. While consistency is good, this single label change in isolation won't establish a standard. If capitalization needs to be standardized, it should be done systematically across all labels, not one at a time. Delete the comment. The capitalization issue is too minor to warrant a PR comment, especially given the inconsistent capitalization throughout the rest of the file.
4. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/loan/loanGive.ts:119
- Draft comment:
Typographical error: It appears that 'loanGiveReponse' is misspelled. Consider correcting it to 'loanGiveResponse' for improved clarity and correctness. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
5. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/loanPolaris/components/Transaction/TransactionHistories.tsx:5
- Draft comment:
Typo: The identifier 'ScrollTableColls' might be a misspelling. Consider using 'ScrollTableCols' if that's the intended name. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% Since this is an imported component, the name must exist in the styles file. If it was actually misspelled, the code wouldn't compile. The author must have intentionally named it 'ScrollTableColls' in the styles file. Making assumptions about naming without seeing the source is risky. The name does look unusual and could be a legitimate typo that exists in both files. Maybe 'Colls' has a specific meaning I'm not aware of. Even if it is a typo, it would need to be fixed in the styles file first. Commenting on it here without that context isn't helpful. Delete the comment. If there's a typo, it would be caught by the build system or should be addressed in the styles file where it's defined.
6. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/loanPolaris/types.ts:103
- Draft comment:
Typo alert: The property name 'interestEve' appears in both ITransactionDoc and IInvoiceDoc. Please confirm if this is the intended name, or if it should be something like 'interestEver' or another term. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The term 'interestEve' appears to be a deliberate choice since it's used consistently and paired with 'interestNonce'. This seems like domain-specific terminology rather than a typo. The comment is speculative and asks for confirmation rather than pointing out a clear issue. Without deeper domain knowledge, we can't be certain this is actually a problem. I could be wrong about this being intentional terminology - maybe it really is a typo that was copy-pasted between interfaces. Even if it is a typo, the comment violates our rules by asking for confirmation ("Please confirm if...") rather than making a clear assertion about what needs to be changed. The comment should be removed because it's speculative and asks for confirmation rather than pointing out a clear issue that needs to be fixed.
7. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/loanPolaris/types.ts:121
- Draft comment:
Typo alert: The property name 'calcedInfo' in ITransaction might be intended to be 'calculatedInfo'. Please verify if this abbreviation is intentional. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% WhilecalcedInfois indeed an abbreviation, there's no strong evidence that this is incorrect or needs to be changed. The abbreviation might be intentional for brevity, consistent with codebase style, or have specific meaning in the domain. The type isanywhich suggests it's an internal implementation detail. This seems like a purely stylistic suggestion without clear benefit. The abbreviation could potentially make the code less readable for new developers. There might be a codebase style guide that prefers full words over abbreviations. Without access to style guides or domain knowledge, suggesting a rename based purely on personal preference for full words over abbreviations isn't a strong enough reason for a code change. Delete this comment as it's a purely stylistic suggestion without clear evidence that the current name is problematic or incorrect.
8. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/savingPolaris/components/Transaction/TransactionHistories.tsx:25
- Draft comment:
Typo Suggestion: The title text 'Saving history' might be intended to be 'Savings History' if referring to the history of savings. Please double-check for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% This appears to be a purely cosmetic suggestion about text casing. The current "Saving history" matches the prop name convention (savingHistories). The suggestion to change to "Savings History" is subjective and doesn't impact functionality. This kind of minor text suggestion violates the rule about not commenting on UI changes unless there's a clear issue. Perhaps consistency in terminology across the application is important enough to warrant this comment? Maybe "Savings" is the standard term used elsewhere? Without seeing the broader application context, we can't know if this is actually an inconsistency. The current singular form "Saving" matches the component's internal naming convention. This comment should be deleted as it's a subjective UI text suggestion without clear evidence of being incorrect or inconsistent.
Workflow ID: wflow_1QfpnF1DTLzFLDbd
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
|
|
||
| const renderExtraButton = () => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| !transactions[0].isSyncedTransaction && ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Guard against an empty transactions array when accessing transactions[0] to prevent potential runtime errors.
Suggested change
| !transactions[0].isSyncedTransaction && ( | |
| transactions.length > 0 && !transactions[0].isSyncedTransaction && ( |
| const renderRow = (saving) => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <tr key={saving._id}> | ||
| <td>{saving?.responseStr ? 'synced' : 'not synced'}</td> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The table header includes 'Date', but the row content does not display any date. Consider adding a date field for clarity.
Suggested change
| <td>{saving?.responseStr ? 'synced' : 'not synced'}</td> | |
| <td>{saving?.date}</td> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 48e1755 in 52 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
12lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-ui/src/loanPolaris/components/Transaction/Transaction.tsx:36
- Draft comment:
Good addition: checking that 'transactions.length > 0' prevents accessing transactions[0] when the array is empty. Consider refactoring the condition into a well-named constant (e.g.,const showExtraButton = transactions.length > 0 && !transactions[0].isSyncedTransaction;) for better readability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_yF4wzoBbupJwUmhP
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed dd986c0 in 2 minutes and 3 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
210lines of code in4files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/graphql/schema/mutations.ts:13
- Draft comment:
There is a type mismatch for 'loanContractActive': the schema defines its return type as JSON while the resolver returns 'success' (a string). Ensure the schema and resolver are aligned. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
2. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/loan/loanRepayment.ts:78
- Draft comment:
Typo detected: 'loanRepaymentReponse' should likely be 'loanRepaymentResponse' for clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While this is technically correct - there is a typo - fixing variable names is something that would be caught by linters or code review tools. It's a very minor issue that doesn't affect functionality. The rules specifically say not to comment on variable renames or things that would be caught by the build. The typo could potentially make the code slightly less readable. It's a newly introduced variable in this diff. While it's a new variable, this kind of minor naming issue should be caught by automated tools, not manual review comments. The rules are clear about not commenting on variable names. Delete this comment as it violates the rule about not commenting on variable renames or things that would be caught by the build.
3. packages/plugin-syncpolaris-api/src/utils/loan/loanRepayment.ts:78
- Draft comment:
Typo: 'loanRepaymentReponse' appears to be misspelled. Consider renaming it to 'loanRepaymentResponse' to ensure clarity and consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the typo is real, fixing variable names is a very minor issue that would be caught during normal code review or linting. It doesn't affect functionality and is more of a cosmetic issue. According to the rules, we should not make comments that are obvious or unimportant. Variable naming issues fall into this category. The typo could potentially cause confusion when reading the code, and consistent naming is important for code maintainability. While code consistency is important, this is a trivial issue that doesn't warrant a formal comment. It's the kind of thing that can be mentioned informally or caught by automated tools. The comment should be deleted as it points out a trivial naming issue that doesn't materially impact the code's functionality or understanding.
Workflow ID: wflow_n2xdtrMTpK5YoZkW
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
| params.object | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| // if (params.object.transactionType === 'give') { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove the commented out 'give' transaction block if it is no longer needed. Keeping dead code can be confusing.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ISSUE
Context
Your context here. Additionally, any screenshots. Delete this line.
// Delete the below section once completed
PR Checklist
Important
Enhances loan and savings transaction management by adding synchronization with Polaris, including new models, RPC consumers, GraphQL mutations, and UI components.
isSyncedTransactionfield to transaction models intransactions.tsfor both loans and savings to track synchronization status.messageBroker.tsfor handling transaction updates and synchronization.mutations.tsfor sending and syncing transactions with Polaris.queries.tsfor retrieving transaction and contract details.ITransactionandITransactionDocinterfaces intransactions.tsto includeisSyncedTransaction.transactionSchemaintransactions.tsto include new fields for transaction synchronization.Transaction.tsxandTransactionHistories.tsxfor displaying transaction details and sync histories.ContractDetails.tsxandScheduleSection.tsxto integrate transaction history display.styles.tsfor transaction components.fetchPolarisandupdateTransactionfunctions inutils.tsfor handling API requests and transaction updates.This description was created by
for dd986c0. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.