Fixed #707 Replaced var with const and let and added strict mode #712
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #712 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 86.71% 86.71%
=======================================
Files 16 16
Lines 1746 1746
=======================================
Hits 1514 1514
Misses 232 232
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
Hi hjpatel16, great edit of your file, however you forgot to change lines 14-16 from var to let/const. Also, though it may be redundant, please include a description of what you did to the code. |
|
Thanks @DavidLi119, I was confused to use let for those remaining variables but I did make some changes |
humphd
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is looking good. I left a few notes of places where you should use const vs. let. Also, I notice that your Pull Request doesn't have a description. Make sure you always include one, and also reference the issue number you are fixing, for example, "Fixes #707".
Let me know when you've made these changes and pushed again, and I'll re-review.
src/fs-watcher.js
Outdated
| } | ||
|
|
||
| var intercom = Intercom.getInstance(); | ||
| let intercom = Intercom.getInstance(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This could be const, since intercom won't change again.
src/fs-watcher.js
Outdated
|
|
||
| self.close = function() { | ||
| var intercom = Intercom.getInstance(); | ||
| let intercom = Intercom.getInstance(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same thing here, you can use const
|
Fixed #707 for fs-watcher.js file to use let and const instead of var where applicable. You can check under the files changed tab to review my changes |
No description provided.