-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
fix: commentOnPull #252
fix: commentOnPull #252
Conversation
rally.yml
Outdated
|
|
||
| # Comment on the PR in addition to the check message? (true | false) | ||
| commentOnPull: false | ||
| commentOnPull: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@primetheus Should this default be true or would you rather it default to false?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@zkoppert this should be false by default. The reason it's present is because older versions of GHES don't have the Checks API and there won't be a place for these results to be posted. In those cases, users can opt for having the results posted as comments to the PR. I don't think that's the desired default though
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That makes sense to me.
|
@vorobievalex Thanks for contributing! 🎉 Do you have a screenshot you can share that shows that it commented on a PR? |
|
@zkoppert, sure, here is a screenshot of a comment. |
Co-authored-by: Zack Koppert <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚀🚀🚀
Proposed Changes
commentOnPull()used.artifact()and.github.artifactsthat do not exist incontextin probot v9.14.1.pull_request.synchronizeflowReadiness Checklist
Reviewer Checklist
automation,bug,documentation,enhancement,infrastructure, orperformance) for the changelog