Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@ReneWerner87
Copy link
Member

@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 commented Aug 24, 2025

Summary

  • Create the cache directory before acquiring read/write locks to avoid "no such file" errors
  • Add a test that exercises reading and writing through the HTTP cache

Testing

  • GOFLAGS=-mod=mod make lint
  • GOFLAGS=-mod=mod make test

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68ab3541e4a48326bbe8b21059af26ff

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved HTTP cache reliability by ensuring the cache directory is created before reading and writing.
    • Added clearer logging when cache directory creation fails.
  • Tests

    • Added a test covering cache read/write behavior to prevent regressions.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 24, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@ReneWerner87 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 21 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb3f777 and fa0f6e1.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • cmd/httpcache.go (2 hunks)
  • cmd/httpcache_test.go (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The cache directory is now created at the start of readFromFile and writeToFile via os.MkdirAll. Duplicate directory creation after acquiring the write lock was removed. Error logging was added for mkdir failures. A new test validates basic read/write behavior of the HTTP cache.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
HTTP cache implementation
cmd/httpcache.go
Create cache directory at function start in readFromFile and writeToFile; remove duplicated MkdirAll in write path; add mkdir error logs; retain locking, I/O, JSON, and expiry logic.
Tests
cmd/httpcache_test.go
Add Test_HTTPCache_ReadWrite covering clearHTTPCache, writeToFile, and readFromFile; verifies initial miss and subsequent hit with expected body.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  autonumber
  participant Caller
  participant HTTPCache
  participant OS as OS.MkdirAll
  participant FS as FileSystem

  Caller->>HTTPCache: readFromFile(url)
  HTTPCache->>OS: MkdirAll(cacheDir, 0o750)
  alt mkdir fails
    HTTPCache-->>Caller: (nil, false) [log: "httpcache: mkdir ..."]
  else mkdir ok
    HTTPCache->>FS: Read file
    alt cache hit and not expired
      HTTPCache-->>Caller: (body, true)
    else miss/expired
      HTTPCache-->>Caller: (nil, false)
    end
  end
Loading
sequenceDiagram
  autonumber
  participant Caller
  participant HTTPCache
  participant OS as OS.MkdirAll
  participant FS as FileSystem
  participant Lock as WriteLock

  Caller->>HTTPCache: writeToFile(url, body)
  HTTPCache->>OS: MkdirAll(cacheDir, 0o750)
  alt mkdir fails
    HTTPCache-->>Caller: return [log: "httpcache: mkdir ..."]
  else mkdir ok
    HTTPCache->>Lock: Acquire
    HTTPCache->>FS: Write file (JSON)
    HTTPCache->>Lock: Release
    HTTPCache-->>Caller: return
  end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

✏️ Feature

Poem

In burrows of bytes I stash my chow,
A cache-hole carved, created now.
First dig the dir, then store the treat,
Next hop to read—ah, something sweet!
If mkdir squeaks, I note the plight,
But when it works, my nibble’s right. 🥕🐇

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/2025-08-24-16-02-08

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @ReneWerner87, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a potential issue where HTTP cache operations could fail if the cache directory did not exist. It ensures that the necessary cache directory is created before any read or write operations are performed, preventing "no such file" errors. Additionally, a new comprehensive test has been added to validate the read and write functionality of the HTTP cache, improving the robustness and reliability of the caching mechanism.

Highlights

  • Directory Creation in Read Operations: The readFromFile function now includes a check and creation of the cache directory using os.MkdirAll at its very beginning. This ensures that the necessary directory structure is in place before any file read operations or lock acquisitions are attempted, preventing "no such file or directory" errors.
  • Directory Creation in Write Operations: Similarly, the writeToFile function has been updated to include os.MkdirAll at its start. This guarantees the cache directory exists before writing data or acquiring write locks, addressing potential errors related to missing directories. The previous os.MkdirAll call later in the function was removed as it became redundant.
  • New HTTP Cache Test: A new test file, cmd/httpcache_test.go, has been introduced. This file contains Test_HTTPCache_ReadWrite, which thoroughly tests the cache's read and write mechanisms, including scenarios where a file is not yet cached, then written, and subsequently read successfully.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses a potential 'file not found' error by ensuring the HTTP cache directory is created before attempting to acquire a file lock. The changes are logical, and the new test case is a good addition to verify the file-based caching mechanism. I have a couple of suggestions to improve the implementation. First, to avoid redundant system calls, the cache directory creation could be moved to an init() function, making it a one-time operation. Second, the new test could be made more robust by using t.Cleanup to ensure the cache is cleared after the test runs, improving test isolation.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
cmd/httpcache.go (3)

40-44: Tighten directory permissions to 0o700 to minimize metadata exposure.

Files are written with 0o600, but the directory is 0o750, which allows group members to list hashed filenames. While filenames are hashes, listing may still leak request cadence. Prefer 0o700 for the cache dir. On Windows, mode is mostly ignored, so this remains safe and portable.

Apply this diff to both mkdir calls:

- if err := os.MkdirAll(cacheDir, 0o750); err != nil {
+ if err := os.MkdirAll(cacheDir, 0o700); err != nil {

Also applies to: 78-82


100-102: Use temp-file + rename for atomic writes and crash-safety.

An unexpected crash during os.WriteFile can leave a truncated file that future readers will treat as a corrupted cache entry. Writing to a temp file in the same directory and Rename-ing it into place avoids partial writes.

- if err := os.WriteFile(cacheFile(url), b, 0o600); err != nil {
-   log.Printf("httpcache: write cache file for %s: %v", url, err)
- }
+ cf := cacheFile(url)
+ tmp := cf + ".tmp"
+ if err := os.WriteFile(tmp, b, 0o600); err != nil {
+   log.Printf("httpcache: write temp cache file for %s: %v", url, err)
+   return
+ }
+ if err := os.Rename(tmp, cf); err != nil {
+   // Best effort fallback for platforms where rename may not replace.
+   _ = os.Remove(cf) //nolint:errcheck
+   if err2 := os.Rename(tmp, cf); err2 != nil {
+     log.Printf("httpcache: replace cache file for %s: %v", url, err2)
+   }
+ }

21-27: Align in-memory cache semantics with disk TTL to avoid indefinite staleness.

The in-memory responseCache never expires, so a long-lived process can serve stale data far beyond cacheTTL, even though file cache enforces expiry. Consider storing cacheEntry in-memory and enforcing TTL consistently.

@@
 var (
   cacheMu       sync.RWMutex
-  responseCache = make(map[string][]byte)
+  responseCache = make(map[string]cacheEntry)
@@
- cacheMu.RLock()
- if b, ok := responseCache[url]; ok {
-   cacheMu.RUnlock()
-   return b, http.StatusOK, nil
- }
- cacheMu.RUnlock()
+ cacheMu.RLock()
+ if e, ok := responseCache[url]; ok {
+   if time.Now().Before(e.Expiry) {
+     cacheMu.RUnlock()
+     return e.Body, http.StatusOK, nil
+   }
+ }
+ cacheMu.RUnlock()
@@
- if b, ok := responseCache[url]; ok {
-   return b, http.StatusOK, nil
- }
+ if e, ok := responseCache[url]; ok {
+   if time.Now().Before(e.Expiry) {
+     return e.Body, http.StatusOK, nil
+   }
+   delete(responseCache, url)
+ }
@@
- if res.StatusCode == http.StatusOK {
-   responseCache[url] = body
-   writeToFile(url, body)
- }
+ if res.StatusCode == http.StatusOK {
+   responseCache[url] = cacheEntry{Expiry: time.Now().Add(cacheTTL), Body: body}
+   writeToFile(url, body)
+ }
@@
- responseCache = make(map[string][]byte)
+ responseCache = make(map[string]cacheEntry)

If you’d prefer to keep the fast path, you can also add a very small TTL (e.g., 30–60s) for memory while keeping 5 min on disk.

Also applies to: 108-114, 118-121, 151-154, 161-164

cmd/httpcache_test.go (2)

10-16: Isolate cacheDir per test using t.TempDir to avoid cross-test interference.

Because cacheDir is a package-level var, parallel or future tests can step on each other. Point the cache to a unique temp dir and restore afterward.

 func Test_HTTPCache_ReadWrite(t *testing.T) {
-  clearHTTPCache()
+  // Isolate cache directory for this test
+  oldDir := cacheDir
+  cacheDir = t.TempDir()
+  t.Cleanup(func() { cacheDir = oldDir })
+  clearHTTPCache()

9-23: Optional: add an expiry subtest for read path.

If you want to exercise the expiry logic end-to-end, we can temporarily shrink cacheTTL in the test and verify that a read after expiry returns ok == false. Happy to add this as a follow-up.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7adf528 and eb3f777.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • cmd/httpcache.go (2 hunks)
  • cmd/httpcache_test.go (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Build (1.25.x, macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Build (1.25.x, windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Build (1.25.x, macos-13)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
cmd/httpcache.go (2)

40-44: Creating the cache directory before taking the lock fixes ENOENT race. LGTM.

This directly addresses the reported “no such file” failures when the parent dir didn’t exist prior to flock creation. Good placement and diagnostics.


78-82: Mirroring the mkdir precondition in the write path is correct.

Early-return on mkdir failure prevents confusing downstream errors and avoids locking when we can’t proceed anyway.

cmd/httpcache_test.go (1)

9-23: Good baseline read/write test that covers the mkdir-before-lock behavior.

This validates the intended flow and would have caught the original ENOENT. Nice and concise use of testify.

@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 merged commit 23d8879 into master Aug 24, 2025
13 checks passed
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 deleted the codex/2025-08-24-16-02-08 branch August 24, 2025 16:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants