-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
fix: handle nested config braces #193
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. Warning Rate limit exceeded@ReneWerner87 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
WalkthroughUpdated the fiber.Config matching regex in the migration to support nested braces. Added a test covering migration when a custom ErrorHandler coexists with Prefork, verifying Prefork removal from app config and insertion into Listen via ListenConfig, while preserving ErrorHandler. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @ReneWerner87, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses an issue where the migration tool for fiber.Config listener fields failed to correctly parse configurations containing nested brace structures, such as those found in custom ErrorHandler functions. The fix involves updating the regular expression used for parsing to properly handle these nested braces, ensuring accurate migration of configuration fields.
Highlights
- Improved Configuration Parsing: The regular expression used to identify
fiber.Configblocks has been updated to correctly handle nested brace structures, preventing parsing errors in complex configurations. - Enhanced Migration Robustness: This change ensures that the migration tool can accurately process
fiber.Configinstances that include fields with nested anonymous functions, likeErrorHandler. - New Regression Test: A new test case has been added to specifically validate the migration logic for
fiber.Configwhen it contains a customErrorHandler, confirming the fix for nested braces.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request aims to fix an issue with nested braces in fiber.Config during migrations. The regex has been improved, but it's not fully robust for deeply nested structures, which could lead to code corruption during migration. I've left a critical comment on this with a suggestion for a more robust implementation using existing helper functions. Additionally, I've suggested enhancing the new regression test to cover more complex scenarios with nested braces, which would help validate the fix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
cmd/internal/migrations/v3/config_listener_fields.go(1 hunks)cmd/internal/migrations/v3/config_listener_fields_test.go(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
cmd/internal/migrations/v3/config_listener_fields_test.go (1)
cmd/internal/migrations/v3/config_listener_fields.go (1)
MigrateConfigListenerFields(14-141)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: Build (1.25.x, macos-13)
- GitHub Check: Build (1.25.x, macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: Build (1.25.x, windows-latest)
Summary
fiber.Configduring listener field migrationErrorHandlerTesting
make lintmake testhttps://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68ab25ea4c8c832681435423d7dd5af1
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Tests