Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@ReneWerner87
Copy link
Member

@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 commented Aug 24, 2025

Summary

  • handle nested braces in fiber.Config during listener field migration
  • add regression test covering config with custom ErrorHandler

Testing

  • make lint
  • make test

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68ab25ea4c8c832681435423d7dd5af1

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved migration reliability by correctly detecting configuration blocks with nested structures.
    • Ensures listener-related settings are migrated even when a custom error handler is configured.
    • Reduces risk of missed or partial rewrites during migration.
  • Tests

    • Added test coverage for migrations involving an explicit error handler and prefork settings.
    • Verifies correct relocation of listener-related options and expected migration log output.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 24, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@ReneWerner87 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 30aec51 and d2efb7e.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • cmd/internal/migrations/v3/common.go (1 hunks)
  • cmd/internal/migrations/v3/config_listener_fields.go (2 hunks)
  • cmd/internal/migrations/v3/config_listener_fields_test.go (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

Updated the fiber.Config matching regex in the migration to support nested braces. Added a test covering migration when a custom ErrorHandler coexists with Prefork, verifying Prefork removal from app config and insertion into Listen via ListenConfig, while preserving ErrorHandler.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of edits
Migration logic (regex update)
cmd/internal/migrations/v3/config_listener_fields.go
Broadened regex from fiber\.Config\{[^}]*\} to `fiber.Config{(?:[^{}]
Tests for ErrorHandler + Prefork scenario
cmd/internal/migrations/v3/config_listener_fields_test.go
Added test Test_MigrateConfigListenerFields_WithErrorHandler validating: ErrorHandler retained, Prefork removed from app config, Listen updated to use fiber.ListenConfig{EnablePrefork: true}, and migration log message present.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

🧹 Updates

Poem

I nibbled through braces, one by one,
Found nested burrows where configs run.
Plucked Prefork carrots from the patch,
Moved them to Listen—cleaner catch.
ErrorHandler stays, ears up, no fear—
Another tidy warren in Fiber’s sphere. 🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/2025-08-24-14-56-28

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ☢️ Bug Something isn't working label Aug 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @ReneWerner87, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses an issue where the migration tool for fiber.Config listener fields failed to correctly parse configurations containing nested brace structures, such as those found in custom ErrorHandler functions. The fix involves updating the regular expression used for parsing to properly handle these nested braces, ensuring accurate migration of configuration fields.

Highlights

  • Improved Configuration Parsing: The regular expression used to identify fiber.Config blocks has been updated to correctly handle nested brace structures, preventing parsing errors in complex configurations.
  • Enhanced Migration Robustness: This change ensures that the migration tool can accurately process fiber.Config instances that include fields with nested anonymous functions, like ErrorHandler.
  • New Regression Test: A new test case has been added to specifically validate the migration logic for fiber.Config when it contains a custom ErrorHandler, confirming the fix for nested braces.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix an issue with nested braces in fiber.Config during migrations. The regex has been improved, but it's not fully robust for deeply nested structures, which could lead to code corruption during migration. I've left a critical comment on this with a suggestion for a more robust implementation using existing helper functions. Additionally, I've suggested enhancing the new regression test to cover more complex scenarios with nested braces, which would help validate the fix.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8d21c0e and 30aec51.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • cmd/internal/migrations/v3/config_listener_fields.go (1 hunks)
  • cmd/internal/migrations/v3/config_listener_fields_test.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
cmd/internal/migrations/v3/config_listener_fields_test.go (1)
cmd/internal/migrations/v3/config_listener_fields.go (1)
  • MigrateConfigListenerFields (14-141)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Build (1.25.x, macos-13)
  • GitHub Check: Build (1.25.x, macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Build (1.25.x, windows-latest)

@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 merged commit d49d047 into master Aug 24, 2025
13 checks passed
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 deleted the codex/2025-08-24-14-56-28 branch August 24, 2025 15:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

☢️ Bug Something isn't working codex

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants