Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@sixcolors
Copy link
Member

@sixcolors sixcolors commented Dec 12, 2025

Updated wording for grammatical accuracy.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced README description with improved wording and clarity.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Updated wording for grammatical accuracy.
@sixcolors sixcolors requested a review from a team as a code owner December 12, 2025 20:49
@sixcolors sixcolors requested review from ReneWerner87, Copilot, efectn and gaby and removed request for a team December 12, 2025 20:49
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 added ☢️ Bug Something isn't working 📒 Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation labels Dec 12, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @sixcolors, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a minor grammatical inaccuracy within the project's README file. The change specifically refines the language used to describe performance benefits, ensuring correct English usage for countable items.

Highlights

  • Grammar Correction: Corrected the usage of 'less' to 'fewer' when referring to countable nouns (allocations, dependencies) in the README description.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a grammatical error in the README.md file by replacing 'less' with 'fewer' for countable nouns. The change is accurate and improves the project description. I've added one suggestion to further refine the sentence for better readability and flow.

Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR corrects a grammatical error in the README description by changing "less" to "fewer" when referring to countable nouns (allocations and dependencies).

Key changes:

  • Updated "less allocations" to "fewer allocations" (grammatically correct for countable nouns)
  • Updated "less dependencies" to "fewer dependencies" (grammatically correct for countable nouns)
  • Added a comma before "and" in the list

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Walkthrough

Updated README.md to improve grammar and clarity in the project description. Changed wording from "A collection of common functions but with better performance, less allocations and less dependencies created for Fiber" to "A collection of common functions for Fiber with better performance, fewer allocations, and fewer dependencies."

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation
README.md
Improved grammar and phrasing in project description; corrected "but with" to "for", "less" to "fewer" for standard English usage.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • No logic changes; purely textual improvement in documentation
  • Grammar and stylistic updates only

Poem

📖 The words now flow so very clear,
With grammar polished, bright, and dear,
"For Fiber" rings more true today,
Fewer words, in every way!
A rabbit's prose, now refined,
With care and precision combined. 🐰✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Fix grammar in README description' directly and accurately describes the main change—a grammatical correction to the README file's description text.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch sixcolors-patch-1

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e22b2a5 and 2d8df2e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sixcolors sixcolors removed the ☢️ Bug Something isn't working label Dec 12, 2025
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 merged commit 558cdc7 into master Dec 19, 2025
8 checks passed
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 deleted the sixcolors-patch-1 branch December 19, 2025 20:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

📒 Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants