Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Added minor linter fixes.#311

Merged
dpasiukevich merged 3 commits intogoogle:mainfrom
dpasiukevich:typos
Nov 18, 2025
Merged

Added minor linter fixes.#311
dpasiukevich merged 3 commits intogoogle:mainfrom
dpasiukevich:typos

Conversation

@dpasiukevich
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @dpasiukevich, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the overall code quality and consistency by addressing a series of minor linter issues. The changes primarily involve correcting typographical errors, refining grammatical structures in comments and error messages, standardizing capitalization conventions, and adding necessary documentation for exported functions. These adjustments contribute to improved code readability and maintainability without introducing any functional changes to the application.

Highlights

  • Typo Corrections: Multiple typographical errors have been corrected across various files, including 'parametres' to 'parameters', 'lauch' to 'launch', 'concating' to 'concatenating', 'followng' to 'following', 'origina' to 'original', 'richier' to 'richer', 'fuction' to 'function', 'idenfity' to 'identify', and 'Laucher' to 'Launcher'.
  • Grammar Improvements: Grammatical inconsistencies have been addressed in comments and error messages, such as changing 'have to be set' to 'has to be set' and 'its missing field' to 'it is missing fields'.
  • Capitalization Standardization: Capitalization has been standardized in comments and function names, including 'deployCmd' to 'DeployCmd', 'UserId' to 'UserID', and 'GetLLmAuditorAgent' to 'GetLLMAuditorAgent'.
  • Documentation Enhancement: Missing comments have been added for several exported functions to improve code documentation and clarity.
  • Linter-Suggested Fixes: Minor linter-suggested changes were applied, such as correcting t.Fatal to t.Fatalf when using format strings in test files and adjusting error message punctuation.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request primarily addresses minor linter fixes, typos, and grammatical errors across various files, which improves code readability and correctness. The changes are generally good. I've added a few suggestions to further enhance the code quality, including correcting a misleading test error message, improving comment consistency, fixing a typo in a comment, and renaming a function for better clarity. These changes will contribute to better maintainability.

@dpasiukevich dpasiukevich merged commit a09263b into google:main Nov 18, 2025
3 checks passed
@dpasiukevich dpasiukevich deleted the typos branch November 18, 2025 13:29
davidli2010 pushed a commit to davidli2010/adk-go that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2026
* Added Minor linter fixes.

* More typos

* upd
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants