needed for the cpu command on plan 9 ... the irony just keeps comin'
:-)

This passes vet and seems fine.
However, I'm wondering if we can rename xattr_windows.go to xattr_other.go and just update the build tag since the implementations are the same.

Edit: oh no the CI is outdated.

Something like this maybe?
If it causes build problems we can drop that commit.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 58.64%. Comparing base (6f4f11e) to head (a12db31).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #91      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.25%   58.64%   +3.39%     
==========================================
  Files          37       32       -5     
  Lines        4749     4679      -70     
==========================================
+ Hits         2624     2744     +120     
+ Misses       1918     1731     -187     
+ Partials      207      204       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rminnich can you rebase?

Did GitHub get rid of the button that let's me do that?

Giving explicit permission to --autosquash my name out of the --fixup commit if you want to (or whatever seems best).
It probably doesn't need to be its own commit and likely just convolutes the diff.