Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@shemnon
Copy link
Contributor

@shemnon shemnon commented Oct 17, 2020

The warm address/slot data was not returned to the calling messageFrame
for CREATE[2] calls as it was for CALL series calls.

Also, improve performance by using more efficient copy constructors and
reusing objects were relevant.

Addresses holiman/goevmlab#24

Signed-off-by: Danno Ferrin [email protected]

Changelog

The warm address/slot data was not returned to the calling messageFrame
for CREATE[2] calls as it was for CALL series calls.

Also, improve performance by using more efficient copy constructors and
reusing objects were relevant.

Signed-off-by: Danno Ferrin <[email protected]>
Copy link

@holiman holiman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This appears to fix the testcases found via fuzzing. Nothing new found yet

@holiman
Copy link

holiman commented Oct 19, 2020

Update: 28K tests executed, no issues found

Copy link
Contributor

@AbdelStark AbdelStark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@shemnon shemnon merged commit 43abf83 into hyperledger:master Oct 19, 2020
shemnon added a commit to shemnon/besu that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2020
The warm address/slot data was not returned to the calling messageFrame
for CREATE[2] calls as it was for CALL series calls.

Also, improve performance by using more efficient copy constructors and
reusing objects were relevant.

Signed-off-by: Danno Ferrin <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 43abf83)
Signed-off-by: Danno Ferrin <[email protected]>
@shemnon shemnon mentioned this pull request Oct 19, 2020
1 task
shemnon added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2020
The warm address/slot data was not returned to the calling messageFrame
for CREATE[2] calls as it was for CALL series calls.

Also, improve performance by using more efficient copy constructors and
reusing objects were relevant.

Signed-off-by: Danno Ferrin <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 43abf83)
Signed-off-by: Danno Ferrin <[email protected]>
@shemnon shemnon deleted the eip2929create branch February 26, 2022 18:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants