Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@steven-johnson
Copy link
Contributor

Some of them weren't the same as the Make equivalents, which meant that the test diverged between the two build systems (sometimes causing failures due to too-large images).

Some of them weren't the same as the Make equivalents, which meant that the test diverged between the two build systems (sometimes causing failures due to too-large images).
@alexreinking
Copy link
Member

Woot! Let's see if the buildbots like this better.

@alexreinking
Copy link
Member

Passed all buildbots so merging. Here are the times from buildbot/x86-64-linux-testbranch-12-cmake with host-cuda:

bgu                         =   3.25 sec*proc (1 test)
bilateral_grid              =   4.50 sec*proc (1 test)
blur                        =   6.39 sec*proc (1 test)
c_backend                   =   0.02 sec*proc (2 tests)
camera_pipe                 =   1.78 sec*proc (1 test)
conv_layer                  =  44.37 sec*proc (1 test)
cuda_mat_mul                =   0.07 sec*proc (1 test)
depthwise_separable_conv    =   0.64 sec*proc (1 test)
fft                         = 138.99 sec*proc (7 tests)
harris                      =   0.92 sec*proc (1 test)
hist                        =   1.98 sec*proc (1 test)
iir_blur                    =   8.72 sec*proc (1 test)
interpolate                 =   2.96 sec*proc (1 test)
lens_blur                   =   2.29 sec*proc (1 test)
linear_algebra              =   1.06 sec*proc (1 test)
local_laplacian             =   4.60 sec*proc (1 test)
max_filter                  =   3.72 sec*proc (1 test)
nl_means                    =  21.45 sec*proc (1 test)
resize                      =  49.23 sec*proc (25 tests)
stencil_chain               =   3.07 sec*proc (1 test)
unsharp                     =   3.08 sec*proc (1 test)
wavelet                     =   3.35 sec*proc (1 test)

Looks like conv_layer, FFT, and nl_means are taking their sweet time still. There are many resize tests, which is why it stands out, but they're each ~1s.

@alexreinking alexreinking merged commit 382c807 into master Dec 9, 2020
@alexreinking alexreinking deleted the srj/apps-images branch December 9, 2020 12:07
@alexreinking alexreinking added this to the v11.0.0 milestone Dec 11, 2020
alexreinking pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2021
Some of them weren't the same as the Make equivalents, which meant that the test diverged between the two build systems (sometimes causing failures due to too-large images).

(cherry picked from commit 382c807)
alexreinking pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2021
Some of them weren't the same as the Make equivalents, which meant that the test diverged between the two build systems (sometimes causing failures due to too-large images).

(cherry picked from commit 382c807)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants