Conversation
bool types are used with e.g. widening_mul. This situation did not arise from user code doing this directly, but rather through some chain o lowering with float16 types. The test cases added to correctness_intrinsics target the issue directly and do fail without the fix. I did not add broader coverage for bool types and intrinsics as it would require more thinking. Most of them overflow for the true/true case and thus are of questionable use, however widening operations cannot overflow... Certainly we could define the language to forbid this, but currently the frontend does not do so. As indicated above, the use case driving this was not using bool arithmetic to begin with.
1 task
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When bool types are used with e.g. widening_mul, the compiler asserts in Type::narrow as bools cannot be narrowed. This situation did not arise from user code doing this directly, but rather through some chain of lowering with float16 types. The test cases added to correctness_intrinsics exercise the issue directly. They do fail without the fix.
I did not add broader coverage for bool types and intrinsics as it would require more thinking. Most of them overflow for the true/true case and thus are of questionable use, however widening operations cannot overflow... Certainly we could define the language to forbid this, but currently the frontend does not do so. As indicated above, the use case driving this was not using bool arithmetic to begin with.