Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@glatterf42
Copy link
Member

@meksor and @khaeru: here are some tests that I used locally to start investigating why Scenario.clone() is slower on IXMP4Backend than on JDBC. This investigation is not finished, I just mean to make these files available to you :)
Not sure if we want to have these tests around in the future, so please feel free to do with this PR whatever you see fit.

How to review

TBD

PR checklist

  • Continuous integration checks all ✅
  • Add or expand tests; coverage checks both ✅
  • Add, expand, or update documentation.
  • Update release notes.

@glatterf42 glatterf42 marked this pull request as draft December 11, 2025 13:52
@khaeru
Copy link
Member

khaeru commented Dec 11, 2025

Excellent, thanks!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 45 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 97.7%. Comparing base (9448027) to head (e9e87cc).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
ixmp/tests/performance/clone.py 0.0% 45 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main    #620     +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage   98.3%   97.7%   -0.7%     
=======================================
  Files         51      52      +1     
  Lines       6624    6669     +45     
=======================================
  Hits        6518    6518             
- Misses       106     151     +45     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
ixmp/tests/performance/clone.py 0.0% <0.0%> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants