feat: add missing ibc perm cmd #275
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a command-line interface (CLI) for managing Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) non-fungible token transfer permissions. New files Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.OpenSSF Scorecard
Scanned Manifest Files |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
x/ibc/perm/client/cli/cli.go (2)
10-11: Enhance function documentation for clarity.The current comment provides a good starting point, but it could be more specific about the function's purpose and the command it creates.
Consider expanding the comment to something like:
// NewTxCmd returns a Cobra command for IBC permission-related transactions. // It creates a parent command with subcommands for updating admin and permissioned relayers. // The function takes an address.Codec for handling address encoding/decoding in subcommands.This provides more context about the command structure and the purpose of the
acparameter.
12-26: LGTM: Well-structured command creation with a minor suggestion.The implementation of
NewTxCmdis well-structured and follows best practices for creating Cobra commands. The use ofclient.ValidateCmdforRunEensures proper command validation.Consider adding error handling for subcommand creation if
NewUpdateAdminCmdandNewUpdatePermissionedRelayersCmdcan potentially return errors. For example:adminCmd, err := NewUpdateAdminCmd(ac) if err != nil { return nil, err } relayersCmd, err := NewUpdatePermissionedRelayersCmd(ac) if err != nil { return nil, err } txCmd.AddCommand(adminCmd, relayersCmd)This would make the function more robust to potential errors in subcommand creation.
x/ibc/perm/module.go (1)
81-84: LGTM: NewGetTxCmdmethod is well-implemented.The new
GetTxCmdmethod correctly implements theAppModuleBasicinterface and properly uses the module's codec for address encoding. The delegation tocli.NewTxCmdis a good practice for separation of concerns.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this method, for example:
// GetTxCmd returns the root tx command for the IBC perm module. func (b AppModuleBasic) GetTxCmd() *cobra.Command { return cli.NewTxCmd(b.cdc.InterfaceRegistry().SigningContext().AddressCodec()) }x/ibc/perm/client/cli/tx.go (3)
22-22: Correct grammatical error in command descriptionThe
Shortdescription reads "Transfer a ownership of a channel to a new admin". The article 'a' before 'ownership' is unnecessary.Apply this diff to fix the error:
- Short: "Transfer a ownership of a channel to a new admin", + Short: "Transfer ownership of a channel to a new admin",
56-59: Consider accepting multiple relayer addresses as separate argumentsCurrently, the command accepts relayer addresses as a single comma-separated string. It might be more user-friendly to accept relayer addresses as separate arguments, allowing users to specify relayers without formatting them into a single string.
Apply this diff to adjust the command usage:
- Use: "update-relayers [port] [channel] [relayer],...,[relayer]", + Use: "update-relayers [port] [channel] [relayer1] [relayer2] ...", - Args: cobra.ExactArgs(3), + Args: cobra.MinimumNArgs(3),And update the argument parsing accordingly:
- relayers := strings.Split(args[2], ",") + relayers := args[2:]
73-79: Trim whitespace when parsing relayer addressesWhen parsing the relayer addresses, any leading or trailing whitespace could cause issues in address validation. Consider trimming whitespace from each address.
Apply this change:
for i, relayer := range relayers { + relayers[i] = strings.TrimSpace(relayer) if _, err := ac.StringToBytes(relayer); err != nil { return err } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- x/ibc/perm/client/cli/cli.go (1 hunks)
- x/ibc/perm/client/cli/tx.go (1 hunks)
- x/ibc/perm/module.go (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
x/ibc/perm/client/cli/cli.go (2)
1-8: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name
cliis suitable for a file containing CLI-related code. The imports are relevant and necessary for creating Cobra commands, handling addresses, and utilizing Cosmos SDK client functionality.
1-26: Summary: New IBC permission CLI command aligns with PR objectives.This new file successfully introduces the CLI command structure for IBC permissions, aligning with the PR objective of adding a missing IBC permission command. The implementation is well-structured and follows best practices for Cobra command creation.
Minor suggestions for improvement include:
- Enhancing the function documentation for better clarity.
- Considering error handling for subcommand creation if applicable.
Overall, the changes effectively implement the intended feature and maintain good code quality.
x/ibc/perm/module.go (3)
12-12: LGTM: New imports are appropriate for the added functionality.The new imports for
cobraand the localclipackage are necessary and correctly added to support the newGetTxCmdmethod.Also applies to: 20-20
Line range hint
1-84: Summary and RecommendationThe changes to
x/ibc/perm/module.gosuccessfully implement the newGetTxCmdmethod for theAppModuleBasicstruct, addressing the PR objective of adding a missing IBC perm command. The implementation is clean, follows good practices, and integrates well with the existing code.Key points:
- New imports are correctly added to support the new functionality.
- The
GetTxCmdmethod is properly implemented and uses the module's codec for address encoding.- The change aligns with the module's structure and interface implementations.
Recommendations:
- Add a brief comment to document the purpose of the
GetTxCmdmethod.- Run the provided verification script to check for potential impacts on the codebase.
- Ensure comprehensive testing, including unit tests for the new method and integration tests for the CLI functionality.
- Review and update any relevant documentation to reflect this new command.
Overall, the changes look good and can be approved once the suggested verifications and tests are completed.
81-84: Verify impact and test the new functionality.The addition of the
GetTxCmdmethod toAppModuleBasicis a significant change that may affect other parts of the codebase.Please run the following script to check for any potential impacts:
Additionally, please ensure that:
- All existing tests pass with this new addition.
- New tests are added to cover the
GetTxCmdfunctionality.- The new command works as expected when integrated into the CLI.
Would you like assistance in generating unit tests for the new
GetTxCmdmethod?✅ Verification successful
Refine interface implementation checks and verify compliance across modules.
The initial
ast-greppattern did not successfully match theAppModuleBasicstruct. To ensure thatAppModuleBasicproperly includes the newGetTxCmdmethod and implements all required interfaces, please execute the following scripts:Please run these scripts and provide the output so we can further assess the impact of the changes.
Refine interface implementation checks and verify compliance across modules.
The initial check for interface implementations encountered a regex parse error. To ensure that
AppModuleBasiccorrectly implements all required interfaces and includes the newGetTxCmdmethod, please execute the following refined scripts:Please run these scripts and provide the output so we can further assess the impact of the changes.
Verified: GetTxCmd method properly implemented without impacting existing interfaces.
The
GetTxCmdmethod has been correctly added toAppModuleBasic, and all interface implementations across the codebase remain intact. No issues were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential impacts of the new GetTxCmd method # Test 1: Check if AppModuleBasic implements all required interfaces echo "Checking AppModuleBasic interface implementations:" ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type AppModuleBasic struct' # Test 2: Search for usages of AppModuleBasic to ensure compatibility echo "Searching for AppModuleBasic usages:" rg --type go 'AppModuleBasic' # Test 3: Look for any TODO or FIXME comments related to transaction commands echo "Checking for TODO/FIXME comments related to tx commands:" rg --type go 'TODO|FIXME' | rg 'tx|command'Length of output: 23335
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Refine checks for AppModuleBasic interface implementations # Test 1: Verify that AppModuleBasic struct includes GetTxCmd method echo "Verifying AppModuleBasic includes GetTxCmd method:" ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (b AppModuleBasic) GetTxCmd() *cobra.Command' # Test 2: Ensure AppModuleBasic implements the required interfaces by checking interface assignments echo "Checking interface implementations for AppModuleBasic:" rg --type go 'var _ module.AppModuleBasic = AppModuleBasic{}' # Test 3: Search for interface methods to confirm all are implemented echo "Listing all methods of AppModuleBasic to verify interface compliance:" rg --type go 'func \(b AppModuleBasic\) ' | rg -v 'GetTxCmd'Length of output: 4781
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Corrected checks for AppModuleBasic interface implementations # Test 1: Verify that AppModuleBasic struct includes GetTxCmd method echo "Verifying AppModuleBasic includes GetTxCmd method:" ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (b AppModuleBasic) GetTxCmd() \*cobra\.Command' # Test 2: Ensure AppModuleBasic implements the required interfaces by checking interface assignments echo "Checking interface implementations for AppModuleBasic:" rg --type go 'var\s+_\s+module\.AppModuleBasic\s+=\s+AppModuleBasic\{\}' # Test 3: List all methods of AppModuleBasic to verify interface compliance echo "Listing all methods of AppModuleBasic to verify interface compliance:" rg --type go 'func \(b AppModuleBasic\) ' | grep -v 'GetTxCmd'Length of output: 3071
| clientCtx, err := client.GetClientTxContext(cmd) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| sender, err := ac.BytesToString(clientCtx.GetFromAddress()) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return err | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor duplicate code into a helper function
The code for retrieving the clientCtx and sender is duplicated in both NewUpdateAdminCmd and NewUpdatePermissionedRelayersCmd. Consider extracting this logic into a helper function to improve maintainability and reduce code duplication.
Also applies to: 61-69
| for _, relayer := range relayers { | ||
| if _, err := ac.StringToBytes(relayer); err != nil { | ||
| return err | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Provide more informative error messages for invalid relayer addresses
Currently, if an invalid relayer address is encountered, the command returns the error from ac.StringToBytes, which may not be descriptive. Consider returning a more informative error message that includes the invalid address.
Example:
for _, relayer := range relayers {
if _, err := ac.StringToBytes(relayer); err != nil {
- return err
+ return fmt.Errorf("invalid relayer address '%s': %w", relayer, err)
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| for _, relayer := range relayers { | |
| if _, err := ac.StringToBytes(relayer); err != nil { | |
| return err | |
| } | |
| } | |
| for _, relayer := range relayers { | |
| if _, err := ac.StringToBytes(relayer); err != nil { | |
| return fmt.Errorf("invalid relayer address '%s': %w", relayer, err) | |
| } | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
x/gov/keeper/tally_test.go (1)
106-107: Consistent time usage in test setup.The introduction of the
nowvariable and its use in thesetupVestingfunction call is appropriate and consistent with the function's new signature. This change ensures that the same time reference is used throughout the test, improving consistency and determinism.For even better clarity and maintainability, consider extracting the time initialization to a test-wide constant or a helper function. This would make it easier to adjust the test time across multiple test cases if needed in the future.
Here's a suggestion for improvement:
func getTestTime() time.Time { return time.Date(2023, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC) } func Test_Tally(t *testing.T) { ctx, input := createDefaultTestInput(t) now := getTestTime() setupVesting(t, ctx, input, now) // ... rest of the test }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- x/gov/keeper/custom_grpc_query_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/tally_test.go (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
x/gov/keeper/tally_test.go (3)
53-53: Improved test flexibility with explicit time parameter.The addition of the
now time.Timeparameter to thesetupVestingfunction signature is a positive change. It allows for more deterministic and flexible testing by enabling the caller to specify the exact time used in the test setup. This approach facilitates easier debugging and more precise control over time-dependent test scenarios.
171-171: Consistent time progression in test scenario.The update to use
now.Add(time.Minute * 15)instead oftime.Now().UTC().Add(time.Minute * 15)is a good change. It ensures that the time progression in the test is consistently based on the same reference point used in the initial setup. This approach eliminates potential discrepancies that could arise from using the actual current time at different points in the test execution.This change contributes to the overall determinism and reproducibility of the test, which is crucial for reliable test outcomes.
Line range hint
1-182: Overall assessment: Improved test determinism and flexibility.The changes made to this file consistently enhance the determinism and flexibility of the governance module tests. The introduction of an explicit time parameter in the
setupVestingfunction and its consistent usage throughout theTest_Tallyfunction are commendable improvements. These changes make the tests more reliable and easier to debug.A minor suggestion was provided to further improve code clarity and maintainability by extracting the time initialization to a helper function.
No critical issues were found, and all changes align well with good testing practices.
x/gov/keeper/custom_grpc_query_test.go (1)
127-128: Approve changes with a suggestion for verification.The introduction of the
nowvariable and its usage insetupVestingand setting the block time improves the test's determinism. This is a good practice as it makes the test more reliable and easier to debug.Please verify that the
setupVestingfunction is correctly defined and handles the new time parameter appropriately. Run the following script to check thesetupVestingfunction implementation:Also applies to: 192-192
✅ Verification successful
Further Verification: Ensure
setupVestingfunction properly utilizes thenowparameter.Please run the following scripts to verify that the
nowparameter is correctly used within thesetupVestingfunction:
Action Required: Correct and Re-run Verification Scripts
The previous attempt to verify the
setupVestingfunction encountered errors due to incorrect script syntax. Please run the following corrected scripts to ensure that thenowparameter is properly utilized within thesetupVestingfunction:Please ensure that the `` tag is not included within the script block. Instead, place it before the shell script block if you intend to run multiple scripts sequentially. For example:
Once you execute the corrected scripts, provide the output so we can proceed with the verification.
Verified:
setupVestingFunction Correctly Utilizes thenowParameterThe
setupVestingfunction inx/gov/keeper/tally_test.gocorrectly uses thenowparameter to set the block time:
- Usage Confirmed:
ctx = ctx.WithBlockTime(now)This ensures that the test maintains determinism and reliability by using a consistent timestamp.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the setupVesting function implementation # Test: Search for the setupVesting function definition rg --type go -A 10 'func setupVesting\(' # Test: Check if the setupVesting function is using the time parameter rg --type go -A 10 'func setupVesting\(.*time\.Time.*\)'Length of output: 1671
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the 'now' parameter within the setupVesting function # Search for the setupVesting function implementation using ast-grep ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func setupVesting($_, $_, $_, now time.Time) { $$$ }' x/gov/keeper/tally_test.go # Check for usage of 'now' within the setupVesting function rg --type go 'func setupVesting\(' -A 20 'now'Length of output: 302
Script:
# Description: Verify the usage of the 'now' parameter within the setupVesting function # Search for the setupVesting function implementation using ast-grep ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func setupVesting($_, $_, $_, now time.Time) { $$$ }' x/gov/keeper/tally_test.go # Check for usage of 'now' within the setupVesting function rg --type go 'func setupVesting\(' -A 20 | rg 'now'Length of output: 333
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Your script hereLength of output: 98
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #275 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 40.64% 40.53% -0.11%
==========================================
Files 265 267 +2
Lines 25246 25314 +68
==========================================
Hits 10262 10262
- Misses 13396 13464 +68
Partials 1588 1588
|
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...