Implement julep run execution #1395

creatorrr · 2025-05-17T17:27:00Z

User description

Summary

implement execution in julep run
document new error handling example in CLI docs
add matching example to Markdown docs
record change in CHANGELOG.md

Testing

poe format (fails: command not found)
poe lint (fails: command not found)
poe typecheck (fails: command not found)
poe test (fails: command not found)
poe check (fails: command not found)

PR Type

Enhancement, Documentation

Description

Implemented task execution logic in julep run with progress feedback.
- Added spinner and clear error reporting for execution creation.
- Errors are now highlighted and exit gracefully.
Updated CLI and Markdown documentation with error handling examples.
Recorded the new feature and documentation updates in the changelog.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

run.py Implement execution logic and progress feedback in `julep run` cli/src/julep_cli/run.py Added task execution logic using Julep API. Integrated progress spinner and descriptive error reporting. Replaced placeholder with actual execution and error handling. Improved user feedback on execution status.	+24/-9

Documentation

README.md `Add error handling example to CLI documentation` cli/README.md Added example for error handling in `julep run`. Demonstrated error output for invalid task IDs.	+7/-0
commands.mdx `Document error handling for invalid task execution` documentation/julepcli/commands.mdx Added example for invalid task ID in `julep run`. Showcased error output for failed execution creation.	+4/-0
CHANGELOG.md `Record execution logic and docs update in changelog` CHANGELOG.md Added changelog entry for new execution logic in `julep run`. Noted documentation improvements for error handling.	+5/-0

Need help?
Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.
Check out the documentation for more information.

Important

Implement task execution in julep run, update documentation, and add GitHub workflow for CLI prereleases.

Behavior:
- Implemented task execution logic in julep run in run.py with progress feedback and error handling.
- Added specific error handling for julep.NotFoundError.
- Updated poe_tasks.toml to use pytest for testing.
Documentation:
- Updated CLI documentation in README.md and commands.mdx with error handling examples.
- Added changelog entry in CHANGELOG.md for new execution logic and documentation updates.
CI/CD:
- Added publish-cli-prerelease.yml GitHub workflow to publish CLI prereleases to PyPI for dev and main branches.

^{This description was created by}^{for 8e66a8f. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

qodo-merge-for-open-source · 2025-05-17T17:27:18Z

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Error Handling The error handling in the execution creation process could be more specific. Currently, it catches all exceptions with a generic handler, which might mask specific error types that could be handled differently. except Exception as e: error_console.print( f"[bold red]Error creating execution: {e}[/bold red]", highlight=True, ) raise typer.Exit(1)

qodo-merge-for-open-source · 2025-05-17T17:27:27Z

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
General	~~Complete progress indicator~~ The progress spinner is started but never completed or updated. Add progress completion after the execution is created to properly finalize the progress indicator and provide better user feedback. cli/src/julep_cli/run.py [73-83] with Progress( SpinnerColumn(), TextColumn("[progress.description]{task.description}"), transient=True, console=console, ) as progress: try: run_task = progress.add_task("Creating execution...", start=False) progress.start_task(run_task) execution = create_execution(client, str(task), task_input) + progress.update(run_task, completed=True) `[Suggestion processed]` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 __ Why: The suggestion improves user feedback by ensuring the progress spinner is properly completed after execution creation, which enhances the CLI experience but does not affect core functionality or correctness.	Low
Update

ellipsis-dev

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to f42e56f in 1 minute and 32 seconds. Click for details.

Reviewed 102 lines of code in 4 files
Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
Skipped posting 3 draft comments. View those below.
Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. cli/src/julep_cli/run.py:18

Draft comment:
The task parameter is typed as UUID, which forces valid UUIDs. The docs use non-UUID examples (e.g. 'bad-id'). Consider switching to string type or updating docs for consistency.
Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

2. cli/README.md:969

Draft comment:
The error handling example uses '--task invalid-id'; ensure this example aligns with the UUID requirement if not updated.
Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50% The example is meant to demonstrate error handling behavior when a task is not found. Using "invalid-id" clearly communicates this purpose to readers. There's no evidence in the documentation that task IDs must be UUIDs - in fact, the docs show that tasks can be referenced by "id or name" (line 952). The current example is more readable and serves its educational purpose well. The comment assumes task IDs must be UUIDs without evidence. The documentation actually contradicts this by stating tasks can be referenced by name. The current example using "invalid-id" is more readable and aligns with the documented behavior that tasks can be referenced by name or ID. Delete the comment. The current example is clear and correct according to the documentation, and changing it to a UUID would make it less readable without adding value.

3. documentation/julepcli/commands.mdx:257

Draft comment:
The example uses '--task bad-id', which may conflict with the UUID requirement. Please update for consistency with the run command implementation.
Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.

Workflow ID: wflow_7pgGoR0F8pp5aCoe

^{You can customize}^{by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}

Signed-off-by: Diwank Singh Tomer <[email protected]>

gitguardian · 2025-06-07T07:19:14Z

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 1 secret following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secret in your pull request

GitGuardian id	GitGuardian status	Secret	Commit	Filename
17693055	Triggered	JSON Web Token	`dbbd659`	cli/tests/test_auth.py	View secret

🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets

Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
Revoke and rotate this secret.
If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.

To avoid such incidents in the future consider

following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.

^{🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.}

.github/workflows/publish-cli-prerelease.yml

ellipsis-dev

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed 8e66a8f in 1 minute and 39 seconds. Click for details.

Reviewed 146 lines of code in 1 files
Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
Skipped posting 4 draft comments. View those below.
Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. .github/workflows/publish-cli-prerelease.yml:42

Draft comment:
The grep/sed command for version extraction may not handle leading whitespace or format variations. Consider using a more robust regex.
Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The current regex could fail if the pyproject.toml has extra whitespace. However, pyproject.toml files are typically machine-generated or follow strict formatting. The current regex works for the standard case. The suggestion is technically more robust but may be overengineering for this use case. The current version works and is simpler to read. The comment identifies a real edge case that could cause issues. If the pyproject.toml is hand-edited or formatted differently, the current regex could fail. While technically correct, this feels like premature optimization. The standard pyproject.toml format is very consistent, and the current regex handles the common case well. The comment should be removed. While technically valid, it suggests a more complex solution for an edge case that's unlikely to occur in practice, given the standardized nature of pyproject.toml files.

2. .github/workflows/publish-cli-prerelease.yml:97

Draft comment:
With the working directory set to './cli', 'packages-dir: cli/dist/' likely resolves to './cli/cli/dist'. Use 'dist/' instead.
Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The working directory is indeed set to ./cli for all run steps. The build step would create the dist directory inside ./cli. The PyPI publish action likely resolves paths relative to the repository root, not the working directory setting. Need to consider if the current path cli/dist/ is actually correct from the root. I could be wrong about how the PyPI publish action resolves paths - it might actually inherit the working-directory setting. The documentation for the action should be checked. Even with some uncertainty about path resolution, the current path cli/dist/ is logically correct when viewed from the repository root, which is typically how GitHub Actions work. The comment appears to be incorrect. The current path cli/dist/ is correct as it points to the dist directory inside the cli folder from the repository root.

3. .github/workflows/publish-cli-prerelease.yml:84

Draft comment:
Ensure that the pip version in the environment supports 'pip index versions'. You might need to upgrade pip for compatibility.
Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None

4. .github/workflows/publish-cli-prerelease.yml:139

Draft comment:
Add a trailing newline at the end of the file for POSIX compliance.
Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_uRg7wCcn0P4HxjOb

^{You can customize}^{by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}

qodo-merge-for-open-source · 2025-06-07T07:21:29Z

cli/src/julep_cli/run.py

-        raise typer.Exit(1)
+    # AIDEV-NOTE: Execute task via Julep API and surface errors clearly
+    with Progress(
+        SpinnerColumn(),


Suggestion: Complete progress indicator

Suggested change

SpinnerColumn(),

execution = create_execution(client, str(task), task_input)

progress.update(run_task, completed=True)

…in permissions Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

feat(cli): implement task run execution

f42e56f

creatorrr added the codex label May 17, 2025 — with ChatGPT Codex Connector

qodo-merge-for-open-source bot added the Review effort 2/5 label May 17, 2025

ellipsis-dev bot reviewed May 17, 2025

View reviewed changes

creatorrr added 3 commits June 7, 2025 12:47

feat(cli): Implement ; switch to ty

25a02c8

Signed-off-by: Diwank Singh Tomer <[email protected]>

fix(cli): Fix types, tests; port to pytest

dbbd659

Signed-off-by: Diwank Singh Tomer <[email protected]>

feat(.github): Github action to auto-publish cli alpha builds

8e66a8f

Signed-off-by: Diwank Singh Tomer <[email protected]>

github-advanced-security bot found potential problems Jun 7, 2025

View reviewed changes

.github/workflows/publish-cli-prerelease.yml Fixed Show fixed Hide fixed

Merge branch 'dev' into codex/implement-task-execution-logic-in-run-py

77b84ed

ellipsis-dev bot reviewed Jun 7, 2025

View reviewed changes

qodo-merge-for-open-source bot reviewed Jun 7, 2025

View reviewed changes

creatorrr and others added 2 commits June 7, 2025 12:51

Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 22: Workflow does not conta…

677c427

…in permissions Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

Update publish-cli-prerelease.yml

0c22edd

creatorrr merged commit 1cebd5b into dev Jun 7, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed

creatorrr deleted the codex/implement-task-execution-logic-in-run-py branch June 7, 2025 07:25

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Implement julep run execution #1395

Implement julep run execution #1395

Uh oh!

creatorrr commented May 17, 2025 •

edited by ellipsis-dev bot

Loading

Uh oh!

qodo-merge-for-open-source bot commented May 17, 2025

Uh oh!

qodo-merge-for-open-source bot commented May 17, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Uh oh!

gitguardian bot commented Jun 7, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Uh oh!

qodo-merge-for-open-source bot Jun 7, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

	SpinnerColumn(),
	execution = create_execution(client, str(task), task_input)
	progress.update(run_task, completed=True)

Implement julep run execution #1395

Implement julep run execution #1395

Uh oh!

Conversation

creatorrr commented May 17, 2025 • edited by ellipsis-dev bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

User description

Summary

Testing

PR Type

Description

Changes walkthrough 📝

Uh oh!

qodo-merge-for-open-source bot commented May 17, 2025

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Uh oh!

qodo-merge-for-open-source bot commented May 17, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Uh oh!

ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

gitguardian bot commented Jun 7, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 1 secret following the scan of your pull request.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

qodo-merge-for-open-source bot Jun 7, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

creatorrr commented May 17, 2025 •

edited by ellipsis-dev bot

Loading

qodo-merge-for-open-source bot commented May 17, 2025 •

edited

Loading

gitguardian bot commented Jun 7, 2025 •

edited

Loading