Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

(clean): remove redundant tsconfig strict opts in tests#690

Merged
agilgur5 merged 1 commit intojaredpalmer:masterfrom
agilgur5:clean-tsconfig-strict-tests
Apr 20, 2020
Merged

(clean): remove redundant tsconfig strict opts in tests#690
agilgur5 merged 1 commit intojaredpalmer:masterfrom
agilgur5:clean-tsconfig-strict-tests

Conversation

@agilgur5
Copy link
Collaborator

@agilgur5 agilgur5 commented Apr 20, 2020

  • removed them in the templates in a previous commit, forgot to remove
    them in the tests too

    • presets would really help with this duplication / inconsistency
      problem
  • noImplicitAny, noImplicitThis, alwaysStrict, strictNullChecks,
    strictFunctionTypes, and strictPropertyInitialization are already
    enabled by strict, no need to configure them twice


Follow-up to #673 . Another reason for #634

- removed them in the templates in a previous commit, forgot to remove
  them in the tests too
  - presets would really help with this duplication / inconsistency
    problem

- noImplicitAny, noImplicitThis, alwaysStrict, strictNullChecks,
  strictFunctionTypes, and strictPropertyInitialization are already
  enabled by strict, no need to configure them twice
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@agilgur5 agilgur5 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same 6 lines removed in all 6 files 👍

@agilgur5 agilgur5 merged commit 5c73483 into jaredpalmer:master Apr 20, 2020
paul-vd pushed a commit to EezyQuote/tsdx that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2020
)

- removed them in the templates in a previous commit, forgot to remove
  them in the tests too
  - presets would really help with this duplication / inconsistency
    problem

- noImplicitAny, noImplicitThis, alwaysStrict, strictNullChecks,
  strictFunctionTypes, and strictPropertyInitialization are already
  enabled by strict, no need to configure them twice
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments