Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[ISS-91] Socket filter eBPF program as an alternative for TC #92

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 31, 2025
Merged

[ISS-91] Socket filter eBPF program as an alternative for TC #92

merged 6 commits into from
Aug 31, 2025

Conversation

@k8spacket
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 31, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 7.89474% with 140 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
ebpf/socketfilter/socketfilter.go 0.00% 96 Missing ⚠️
ebpf/socketfilter/socketfilter_bpfel.go 0.00% 33 Missing ⚠️
modules/model.go 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
k8spacket.go 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
ebpf/tc/tc.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 54.65% <7.89%> (-5.51%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
ebpf/inet/bpf_x86_bpfel.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
ebpf/loader.go 93.33% <100.00%> (+1.44%) ⬆️
ebpf/tc/tc_bpfel.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
modules/tls-parser/listener.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
ebpf/tc/tc.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
k8spacket.go 35.55% <0.00%> (-0.81%) ⬇️
modules/model.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
ebpf/socketfilter/socketfilter_bpfel.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
ebpf/socketfilter/socketfilter.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@k8spacket k8spacket merged commit fb797d0 into master Aug 31, 2025
48 of 55 checks passed
@k8spacket k8spacket deleted the feature/ISS-91-add-socket-filter-as-a-alternative-for-traffic-control branch August 31, 2025 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@k8spacket @bareckidarek