Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@cgeorgilakis
Copy link
Contributor

closes #10388

@cgeorgilakis
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have updated to latest main.
Could you review it in order to be able to hide a scope from scopes_supported in discovery endpoint?

@ahus1
Copy link
Contributor

ahus1 commented Jun 19, 2024

The linting in the admin UI complains, please check the logs. I'm switching this PR to "draft" in the meantime. Please switch it back to "ready-for-review" when you want to have it reviewed again.

Unfortunately the Admin UI tests are currently unstable, see #30492 - if those tests fail again, it might be worth waiting for that issue to be closed first and then rebase, or asking a maintainer to re-run the tests.

@ahus1 ahus1 marked this pull request as draft June 19, 2024 12:55
@cgeorgilakis cgeorgilakis force-pushed the RCIAM-859-hideFromOpenIDProviderMetadata branch from b5922c3 to 840ef55 Compare June 20, 2024 06:18
@dalbani
Copy link
Contributor

dalbani commented Jun 25, 2025

@cgeorgilakis: would you mind refreshing your PR, should you have the time to do so? If not, I'm willing to have a try, so that we can have hopefully have this feature added to Keycloak.
Thanks!

@cgeorgilakis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cgeorgilakis: would you mind refreshing your PR, should you have the time to do so? If not, I'm willing to have a try, so that we can have hopefully have this feature added to Keycloak. Thanks!

Unfortunatelly no this period. Feel free to rebase it and proceed with PR.

@cgeorgilakis cgeorgilakis force-pushed the RCIAM-859-hideFromOpenIDProviderMetadata branch 2 times, most recently from d1c2971 to 0002987 Compare October 23, 2025 06:51
Copy link

@keycloak-github-bot keycloak-github-bot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unreported flaky test detected, please review

@keycloak-github-bot
Copy link

Unreported flaky test detected

If the flaky tests below are affected by the changes, please review and update the changes accordingly. Otherwise, a maintainer should report the flaky tests prior to merging the PR.

org.keycloak.testsuite.federation.ldap.LDAPProvidersIntegrationTest#updateLDAPUsernameTest

Keycloak CI - Base IT (5)

org.keycloak.testsuite.runonserver.RunOnServerException: java.lang.NullPointerException
	at org.keycloak.testsuite.client.KeycloakTestingClient$Server.fetchString(KeycloakTestingClient.java:185)
	at org.keycloak.testsuite.federation.ldap.LDAPProvidersIntegrationTest.updateLDAPUsernameTest(LDAPProvidersIntegrationTest.java:1656)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
...

Report flaky test

@cgeorgilakis cgeorgilakis force-pushed the RCIAM-859-hideFromOpenIDProviderMetadata branch 2 times, most recently from 0b59579 to 307bd7e Compare October 24, 2025 06:38
@cgeorgilakis cgeorgilakis marked this pull request as ready for review October 24, 2025 06:40
@cgeorgilakis
Copy link
Contributor Author

The linting in the admin UI complains, please check the logs. I'm switching this PR to "draft" in the meantime. Please switch it back to "ready-for-review" when you want to have it reviewed again.

Unfortunately the Admin UI tests are currently unstable, see #30492 - if those tests fail again, it might be worth waiting for that issue to be closed first and then rebase, or asking a maintainer to re-run the tests.

@ahus1 @dalbani I have rebased my PR, making all needed changes. It is ready for review.

@keycloak-github-bot
Copy link

Unreported flaky test detected

If the flaky tests below are affected by the changes, please review and update the changes accordingly. Otherwise, a maintainer should report the flaky tests prior to merging the PR.

org.keycloak.testsuite.federation.ldap.LDAPProvidersIntegrationTest#updateLDAPUsernameTest

Keycloak CI - Base IT (5)

org.keycloak.testsuite.runonserver.RunOnServerException: java.lang.NullPointerException
	at org.keycloak.testsuite.client.KeycloakTestingClient$Server.fetchString(KeycloakTestingClient.java:185)
	at org.keycloak.testsuite.federation.ldap.LDAPProvidersIntegrationTest.updateLDAPUsernameTest(LDAPProvidersIntegrationTest.java:1656)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
...

Report flaky test

Copy link

@keycloak-github-bot keycloak-github-bot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unreported flaky test detected, please review

Copy link
Contributor

@ahus1 ahus1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the updated PR. See below for two changes I ask for before this PR can be merged.

Comment on lines 193 to 200
<DefaultSwitchControl
name={convertAttributeNameToForm<ClientScopeDefaultOptionalType>(
"attributes.hide.from.openid.provider.metadata",
)}
label={t("hideFromOpenIdProviderMetadata")}
labelIcon={t("hideFromOpenIdProviderMetadataHelp")}
stringify
/>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see that this is visible also for SAML scope. IMHO this should only be visible for OIDC scopes given its name. If there be an equivalent setting for SAML, it should be renamed to something generic.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I check if it is not SAML. As I have understood, there is also OID4VC_PROTOCOL scopes now.

Comment on lines 3608 to 3609
hideFromOpenIdProviderMetadata=Hide from OpenID Provider Metadata
hideFromOpenIdProviderMetadataHelp=If on, this client scope will be hidden from OpenID Provider Metadata.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is an existing option in the same dialog with the "Include in token scope", and this new option is inverting it by stating "Hide from..."

Please rework this new option to also be name "Include in ...". When doing this, this needs to be inverted to be true by default both in the back end and in the front end.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The main problem with this logic is the migration process from older version.
As I understand, this will need a migration method for making all scopes include.in.openid.provider.metadata to true .
Do we want it? That's why I named it hide.from.openid.provider.metadata.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cgeorgilakis - thank you for reaching out. I agree a migration method would not be ideal. Instead of a migration, I would suggest to have a default of "true" both in the backend and the frontend. WDYT?

@ahus1 ahus1 self-assigned this Nov 1, 2025
@cgeorgilakis cgeorgilakis force-pushed the RCIAM-859-hideFromOpenIDProviderMetadata branch from ff5e779 to 7d0a2c6 Compare November 3, 2025 09:26
@cgeorgilakis cgeorgilakis force-pushed the RCIAM-859-hideFromOpenIDProviderMetadata branch from 7d0a2c6 to f6f3f66 Compare November 3, 2025 10:56
@cgeorgilakis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ahus1 I have made the requested changes.
The failed test is not PR fault, it is due to Could not resolve dependencies for project org.keycloak:keycloak-quarkus-integration-tests:jar:999.0.0-SNAPSHOT.

@cgeorgilakis cgeorgilakis requested a review from ahus1 November 3, 2025 13:02
Signed-off-by: Alexander Schwartz <[email protected]>
@ahus1
Copy link
Contributor

ahus1 commented Nov 3, 2025

@cgeorgilakis - thank you, looks great. Some small changes here: eosc-kc#1028

As I wasn't allowed push the changes directly (no permission), so I created a PR on top of this PR.

Please merge my PR, and then this PR is ready to be merged.

Best,
Alexander

@ahus1 ahus1 enabled auto-merge (squash) November 3, 2025 15:27
@ahus1 ahus1 merged commit 1c0d461 into keycloak:main Nov 3, 2025
80 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow to hide client scopes from scopes_supported in discovery endpoint

4 participants