Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Execute only FIPS Unit tests, not UT of dependent modules #22038

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
ahus1 merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2023
Merged

Execute only FIPS Unit tests, not UT of dependent modules #22038

ahus1 merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2023

Conversation

@mabartos
Copy link
Contributor

@mabartos mabartos commented Jul 27, 2023

Just spotted this issue.

As the -am is specified, all dependent modules are also built, which provoke also the execution of unit tests for dependent modules. The execution of other UTs is made in Base UT and doesn't need to be executed twice as there's no difference to execute it with various types of FIPS configs.

@rmartinc @mposolda Could you please check it? Thanks

@mabartos mabartos requested a review from a team as a code owner July 27, 2023 15:20
@mabartos mabartos requested a review from a team July 27, 2023 15:20
@ghost ghost added the team/core label Jul 27, 2023
@mposolda mposolda self-assigned this Jul 28, 2023
mposolda
mposolda approved these changes Jul 28, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@mposolda mposolda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mabartos LGTM, Thanks for this improvement!
@rmartinc Does this look ok to you?

@mposolda mposolda requested a review from rmartinc July 28, 2023 06:38
rmartinc
rmartinc approved these changes Jul 28, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@rmartinc rmartinc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks @mabartos !

@mabartos
Copy link
Contributor Author

mabartos commented Jul 28, 2023 •
edited
Loading

The Keycloak CI wasn't executed as it seems the conditional stuff doesn't catch changes in the scripts folder?

@mposolda Is it possible to execute it? Thanks

EDIT: Related to: #22064

@mposolda
Copy link
Contributor

mposolda commented Jul 28, 2023 •
edited
Loading

@mabartos It seems I cannot manually trigger it. The option might be one of:

  • Do some "dummy change" in this PR in some file under crypto/* to ensure the CI is triggered.
  • Do some "dummy change" just in some your branch (you can add dummy-change in additional commit) and push to your fork and then send the link here where it can be seen that FIPS tests are successfully executed
  • Wait until Execute CI when some changes were made in scripts dir #22064

@mabartos
Copy link
Contributor Author

mabartos commented Jul 28, 2023

@mposolda Ok, thanks. We can wait for the #22064

@mabartos
Copy link
Contributor Author

mabartos commented Jul 31, 2023

@mposolda Rebased. FIPS UT passed; everything works as expected.

@ahus1 ahus1 merged commit ee6a29f into keycloak:main Aug 2, 2023
stianst pushed a commit to stianst/keycloak that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2023
@mabartos @stianst
Execute only FIPS Unit tests, not UT of dependent modules (keycloak#2…
a27aaa3 
…2038)
stianst pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2023
@mabartos @stianst
Execute only FIPS Unit tests, not UT of dependent modules (#22038)
e6b8ae7
This was referenced Sep 6, 2023
Closed
Closed
@stianst stianst mentioned this pull request Nov 14, 2023
Closed
@stianst stianst mentioned this pull request May 6, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@mposolda mposolda mposolda approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@rmartinc rmartinc rmartinc approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@mposolda mposolda

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@mabartos @mposolda @rmartinc @ahus1