Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@dni
Copy link
Member

@dni dni commented Nov 30, 2023

feature is required by #2139

@dni dni requested review from jackstar12 and motorina0 November 30, 2023 22:36
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 30, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 58.63%. Comparing base (6083948) to head (05e88ad).
Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #2140      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.53%   58.63%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          61       61              
  Lines        9187     9193       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits         5378     5390      +12     
+ Misses       3809     3803       -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@motorina0
Copy link
Collaborator

Please add some unit tests.

@dni dni force-pushed the feat-groupby-fetchpage branch from 3aac26e to 16954ab Compare December 14, 2023 14:15
@motorina0
Copy link
Collaborator

Can we please have one small test for GROUP BY.

@prusnak prusnak added this to the 0.12.0 milestone Dec 16, 2023
@dni dni requested review from motorina0 and prusnak December 20, 2023 08:28
@dni
Copy link
Member Author

dni commented Dec 20, 2023

added tests

@dni dni force-pushed the feat-groupby-fetchpage branch 2 times, most recently from 9594a86 to 72e08f3 Compare January 22, 2024 08:45
@dni dni requested a review from motorina0 January 22, 2024 08:46
@dni dni modified the milestones: 0.12.0, 0.12.1 Feb 5, 2024
values: Optional[List[str]] = None,
filters: Optional[Filters] = None,
model: Optional[Type[TRowModel]] = None,
group_by: Optional[List[str]] = None,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The users need to know that they have to add an aggregator function (max, count, etc) when using group_by. Otherwise the query execution will fail.

Can this requirement be documented somewhere?

@dni dni modified the milestones: 0.12.2, 0.12.3 Feb 15, 2024
@dni dni force-pushed the feat-groupby-fetchpage branch from 53b636f to c093440 Compare February 21, 2024 10:19
@dni dni force-pushed the feat-groupby-fetchpage branch from c093440 to d991538 Compare March 12, 2024 12:36
@dni dni merged commit 7ce4edd into dev Mar 12, 2024
@dni dni deleted the feat-groupby-fetchpage branch March 12, 2024 12:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants