Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@dni
Copy link
Member

@dni dni commented Jun 28, 2024

websocket weren't working with that conf

websocket weren't working with that conf
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 61.26%. Comparing base (7f62894) to head (4497340).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #2564      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   61.24%   61.26%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          69       69              
  Lines        9914     9914              
==========================================
+ Hits         6072     6074       +2     
+ Misses       3842     3840       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@prusnak
Copy link
Collaborator

prusnak commented Jun 28, 2024

I pushed another commit which cleanups the config change - I have been using it like this for ages and it works.

Also the commit adds more directives which are needed for some of the extensions.

@arcbtc arcbtc merged commit 0e1090b into dev Jul 9, 2024
@arcbtc arcbtc deleted the docs-nginx branch July 9, 2024 12:56
motorina0 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
* docs: nginx websocket support for reverse proxy

websocket weren't working with that conf

* cleanup

---------

Co-authored-by: Pavol Rusnak <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants