Fixed typo in covariate names #140
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
martinfleis
approved these changes
Jan 1, 2024
Member
martinfleis
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My bad! Thanks for noticing!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Covariate names were stored as
x_namein MGWRResult instead of thename_xconvention used everywhere else, leading toMGWRResult.summary(),summaryGLM(), andsummaryMGWR()unable to display the covariate names even if they are specified. Just a simple typo correction.mgwr/mgwr/gwr.py
Line 1284 in 5b484ef
mgwr/mgwr/summary.py
Line 17 in 5b484ef
mgwr/mgwr/summary.py
Line 62 in 5b484ef