Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@jGaboardi
Copy link
Member

This PR resolves #320.

@jGaboardi jGaboardi self-assigned this Jan 2, 2023
@jGaboardi jGaboardi requested review from gegen07 and ljwolf January 2, 2023 03:01
@jGaboardi jGaboardi mentioned this pull request Jan 6, 2023
4 tasks
@gegen07
Copy link
Member

gegen07 commented Jan 10, 2023

@jGaboardi Sorry for the delay. I'll have time to review it tomorrow 😬

@jGaboardi
Copy link
Member Author

@jGaboardi Sorry for the delay. I'll have time to review it tomorrow 😬

Awesome! And no worries. Thanks for taking the time (when you have it)!

Copy link
Member

@gegen07 gegen07 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • In Assign simulated points network locations section, I think there is a typo. It is written The simulated client and facility points do not ahere to network space. It is supposed to be adhere? I noted this word in all notebooks that explain a model.

  • There is a typo in lscp_capacity.ipynb in scenario 4. It is written internel instead of internal.

These questions are perfectionism, all notebooks are brilliant.

@jGaboardi
Copy link
Member Author

I love thorough review and greatly appreciate the detailed comb through. I'll make these changes, and then we'll be OK for a merge (if everything else looks OK)?

@jGaboardi jGaboardi merged commit 13c0ddc into pysal:main Jan 10, 2023
@jGaboardi jGaboardi deleted the cap_LSCP_work branch January 10, 2023 18:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

clean up CLSCP-SO implementation

2 participants