Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@layday
Copy link
Member

@layday layday commented Nov 1, 2020

When the build-backend field was missing, we would append the default
PEP 518 requires to the source tree requires. This is in contrast
to pip which leaves requires unmodified. It was therefore possible
to create sdists which pip would not have been able to consume.

Closes #107 by way of not modifying the requires list.

@layday layday requested a review from pganssle November 1, 2020 02:33
When the `build-backend` field was missing, we would append the default
PEP 518 `requires` to the source tree `requires`.  This is in contrast
to pip which leaves `requires` unmodified.  It was therefore possible
to create sdists which pip would not have been able to consume.

Closes pypa#107 by way of not modifying the `requires` list.
@layday layday force-pushed the align-with-pip-when-no-backend branch from e0ddf01 to 1180fa0 Compare November 1, 2020 02:40
Copy link
Contributor

@gaborbernat gaborbernat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@gaborbernat gaborbernat merged commit 38f6451 into pypa:master Nov 1, 2020
@FFY00
Copy link
Member

FFY00 commented Nov 1, 2020

@gaborbernat next time please wait for more feedback on standing issues like this.

@layday layday deleted the align-with-pip-when-no-backend branch March 1, 2024 18:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Double requirement error if build-backend missing

3 participants