-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 353
quantized matmul #1994
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
quantized matmul #1994
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/ao/1994
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 1 New Failure, 1 PendingAs of commit e44f47e with merge base c9b1490 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71370592 |
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71370592 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#1994 TODO: we still dont implement c = alpha * a * b + beta * c. Specifically beta * c would be useful Reviewed By: metascroy Differential Revision: D71370592
a73c5f8 to
d3e8760
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71370592 |
d3e8760 to
76bfa81
Compare
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#1994 TODO: we still dont implement c = alpha * a * b + beta * c. Specifically beta * c would be useful Reviewed By: metascroy Differential Revision: D71370592
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71370592 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#1994 TODO: we still dont implement c = alpha * a * b + beta * c. Specifically beta * c would be useful Reviewed By: metascroy Differential Revision: D71370592
76bfa81 to
8147200
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71370592 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#1994 TODO: we still dont implement c = alpha * a * b + beta * c. Specifically beta * c would be useful Reviewed By: metascroy Differential Revision: D71370592
8147200 to
962d2e9
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71370592 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#1994 TODO: we still dont implement c = alpha * a * b + beta * c. Specifically beta * c would be useful Reviewed By: metascroy Differential Revision: D71370592
962d2e9 to
49b199e
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71370592 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#1994 TODO: we still dont implement c = alpha * a * b + beta * c. Specifically beta * c would be useful Reviewed By: metascroy Differential Revision: D71370592
49b199e to
7115de7
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71370592 |
7115de7 to
5ac6ff5
Compare
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#1994 TODO: we still dont implement c = alpha * a * b + beta * c. Specifically beta * c would be useful Reviewed By: metascroy Differential Revision: D71370592
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71370592 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#1994 TODO: we still dont implement c = alpha * a * b + beta * c. Specifically beta * c would be useful Reviewed By: metascroy Differential Revision: D71370592
5ac6ff5 to
c1b6025
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71370592 |
c1b6025 to
1d08892
Compare
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#1994 TODO: we still dont implement c = alpha * a * b + beta * c. Specifically beta * c would be useful Reviewed By: metascroy Differential Revision: D71370592
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71370592 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#1994 TODO: we still dont implement c = alpha * a * b + beta * c. Specifically beta * c would be useful Reviewed By: metascroy Differential Revision: D71370592
1d08892 to
dbecb19
Compare
Summary: Pull Request resolved: pytorch#1994 TODO: we still dont implement c = alpha * a * b + beta * c. Specifically beta * c would be useful Reviewed By: metascroy Differential Revision: D71370592
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71370592 |
dbecb19 to
e44f47e
Compare
Differential Revision: D71370592 Pull Request resolved: #1994
Differential Revision: D71370592 Pull Request resolved: #1994
Summary: TODO: we still dont implement c = alpha * a * b + beta * c. Specifically beta * c would be useful
Reviewed By: metascroy
Differential Revision: D71370592