Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@jcaip
Copy link
Contributor

@jcaip jcaip commented May 13, 2025

Summary:

att, users can use torchao.prototype.sparsity.blocksparse instead.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Summary:

att, we should use torchao.prototype.sparsity.blocksparse instead.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 13, 2025

πŸ”— Helpful Links

πŸ§ͺ See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/ao/2205

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

βœ… No Failures

As of commit 2bb3335 with merge base 0607aa1 (image):
πŸ’š Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. πŸ’š

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label May 13, 2025
@jcaip jcaip added sparsity topic: deprecation Use this tag if this PR deprecates a feature labels May 13, 2025
@jcaip jcaip merged commit c2d2d13 into main May 13, 2025
18 of 21 checks passed
@jcaip jcaip deleted the jcaip/blocksparse-cleanup branch May 21, 2025 22:03
liangel-02 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2025
Remove sparsity/prototype/blocksparse

Summary:

att, we should use torchao.prototype.sparsity.blocksparse instead.

Test Plan:

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. sparsity topic: deprecation Use this tag if this PR deprecates a feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants