You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The link for the "Scan Repo Discussions" tool points to the implement.md file instead of scan_repo_discussions.md
|**💎 [Scan Reop Discussions (`/scan_repo_discussions`](./implement.md))**| Generates `best_practices.md` file based on previous discussions in the repository |
Note that the tools marked with 💎 are available only for Qodo Merge users.
There's a typo in "Scan Reop Discussions" - should be "Scan Repo Discussions"
|**💎 [Scan Reop Discussions (`/scan_repo_discussions`](./implement.md))**| Generates `best_practices.md` file based on previous discussions in the repository |
Note that the tools marked with 💎 are available only for Qodo Merge users.
The search plugin is commented out, which will disable search functionality on the documentation site. This is inconsistent with having search-related features in the theme configuration. Either uncomment the search plugin or remove the search-related configurations completely.
plugins:
- social
-# - search+ - search
- glightbox
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8
__
Why: The suggestion identifies an important inconsistency where search-related features are commented out in the theme configuration while the search plugin itself is also commented out. Restoring the search plugin is important for documentation site functionality.
Medium
✅ Remove duplicate configuration entrySuggestion Impact:The commit removed the duplicate 'content.tabs.link' entry from the configuration list, exactly as suggested
code diff:
- - content.tabs.link
The content.tabs.link feature is duplicated in the list. Remove the duplicate entry to avoid potential configuration issues.
[To ensure code accuracy, apply this suggestion manually]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7
__
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a duplicate entry for 'content.tabs.link' in the configuration list. Removing the duplicate improves code quality and prevents potential configuration issues.
✅ Fix incorrect documentation linkSuggestion Impact:The commit fixed the documentation link for the Scan Repo Discussions tool, changing it from './implement.md' to './scan_repo_discussions.md' as suggested
code diff:
-| **💎 [Scan Reop Discussions (`/scan_repo_discussions`](./implement.md))** | Generates `best_practices.md` file based on previous discussions in the repository |+| **💎 [Scan Repo Discussions (`/scan_repo_discussions`](./scan_repo_discussions.md))** | Generates `best_practices.md` file based on previous discussions in the repository |
The link to the documentation for the Scan Repo Discussions tool points to the implementation tool page (./implement.md) instead of the correct scan_repo_discussions.md page. This will lead users to the wrong documentation.
-| **💎 [Scan Reop Discussions (`/scan_repo_discussions`](./implement.md))** | Generates `best_practices.md` file based on previous discussions in the repository |+| **💎 [Scan Repo Discussions (`/scan_repo_discussions`](./scan_repo_discussions.md))** | Generates `best_practices.md` file based on previous discussions in the repository |
[Suggestion has been applied]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9
__
Why: The link to the Scan Repo Discussions tool documentation incorrectly points to "implement.md" instead of "scan_repo_discussions.md". This is a critical navigation issue that would lead users to the wrong documentation page, affecting usability.
High
Learned best practice
Include error handling information for configuration parameters to prevent runtime errors when invalid values are provided
The configuration options don't include any validation or error handling guidance. It's important to mention what happens if users provide invalid values (like negative numbers or non-numeric input) for the configuration parameters. Add information about input validation and error handling to prevent runtime errors.
-- Use `/scan_repo_discussions --scan_repo_discussions.days_back=X` to specify the number of days back to scan for discussions. The default is 365 days.-- Use `/scan_repo_discussions --scan_repo_discussions.minimal_number_of_prs=X` to specify the minimum number of merged PRs needed to generate the `best_practices.md` file. The default is 50 PRs.+- Use `/scan_repo_discussions --scan_repo_discussions.days_back=X` to specify the number of days back to scan for discussions. The default is 365 days. If a negative or non-numeric value is provided, the default will be used.+- Use `/scan_repo_discussions --scan_repo_discussions.minimal_number_of_prs=X` to specify the minimum number of merged PRs needed to generate the `best_practices.md` file. The default is 50 PRs. If a negative or non-numeric value is provided, the default will be used.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
User description
…practices
PR Type
Enhancement, Documentation
Description
Introduced a new tool
/scan_repo_discussionsfor generating best practices.Updated documentation to include details about the new tool.
Enhanced the README and other docs with updated tool descriptions and images.
Adjusted configuration and navigation settings for the new tool integration.
Changes walkthrough 📝
README.md
Added `/scan_repo_discussions` tool announcement and detailsREADME.md
/scan_repo_discussionstool.index.md
Updated tools index with `/scan_repo_discussions`docs/docs/index.md
/scan_repo_discussionstool to the tools list.index.md
Included `/scan_repo_discussions` in tools overviewdocs/docs/tools/index.md
/scan_repo_discussionstool to the tools list.scan_repo_discussions.md
Added detailed documentation for `/scan_repo_discussions`docs/docs/tools/scan_repo_discussions.md
/scan_repo_discussions.mkdocs.yml
Updated navigation and theme for `/scan_repo_discussions`docs/mkdocs.yml
/scan_repo_discussionsto the navigation menu.