Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@CluEleSsUK
Copy link
Contributor

closes #69
nice

@CluEleSsUK CluEleSsUK mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2025
@CluEleSsUK CluEleSsUK force-pushed the fix/verifier-signing-message branch from 46c4de4 to 76fa41b Compare September 5, 2025 13:25
Comment on lines 99 to 104
params.amountOut,
params.srcChainId,
params.dstChainId,
params.verificationFee,
params.solverFee,
params.nonce,
params.executed,
)
.abi_encode()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For reference, this message is not unique per-router contract => two routers contracts on the same chain would result in the same message. This may allow re-using the signature to fulfill the swap using another router contract on the same chain (and, with the same signature scheme).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Base automatically changed from feat/onlyswaps-verifier-v1 to main September 5, 2025 15:31
@CluEleSsUK CluEleSsUK force-pushed the fix/verifier-signing-message branch from 76fa41b to 7ffa84a Compare September 5, 2025 15:33
@CluEleSsUK CluEleSsUK merged commit 5d70a55 into main Sep 5, 2025
5 checks passed
@CluEleSsUK CluEleSsUK deleted the fix/verifier-signing-message branch September 5, 2025 15:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Change the signature format for swap verification

3 participants