Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[RayJob] add Failing RayJob in HTTPMode e2e test for rayjob with retry #2242

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 14, 2024
Merged

[RayJob] add Failing RayJob in HTTPMode e2e test for rayjob with retry #2242

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 14, 2024

Conversation

@tinaxfwu
Copy link
Contributor

@tinaxfwu tinaxfwu commented Jul 12, 2024

Why are these changes needed?

Add the "The RayJob in HTTPMode fails and retries" test.

kuberay/ray-operator/test/e2e/rayjob_retry_test.go

Lines 89 to 93 in ea314d7

// test.T().Run("Failing RayJob in HTTPMode", func(_ *testing.T) {
// TODO: The RayJob in HTTPMode fails and retries. This test is similar to the
// "Failing RayJob without cluster shutdown after finished" test in rayjob_lightweight_test.go.
// The difference is that here we set RayJob.BackoffLimit.
// })

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've made sure the tests are passing.
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Manual tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

Testing was conducted on my Apply M2 Mac, with the RayImage changed to rayproject/ray:2.9.0-aarch64 in the ray-operator/test/support/defaults.go file.

Below are the commands I used for the test and the resulting test logs.

$ cd ray-operator
$ kind create cluster --image=kindest/node:v1.24.0
$ IMG=kuberay/operator:nightly make docker-build
$ kind load docker-image kuberay/operator:nightly
$ helm install kuberay-operator --set image.repository=kuberay/operator --set image.tag=nightly ../helm-chart/kuberay-operator
$ go test -timeout 30m -v ./test/e2e/rayjob_retry_test.go ./test/e2e/support.go 

--- PASS: TestRayJobRetry (283.95s)
    --- PASS: TestRayJobRetry/Failing_RayJob_without_cluster_shutdown_after_finished (134.35s)
    --- PASS: TestRayJobRetry/Failing_submitter_K8s_Job (76.77s)
    --- PASS: TestRayJobRetry/Failing_RayJob_in_HTTPMode (72.70s)
PASS
ok  	command-line-arguments	284.457s

andrewsykim
andrewsykim approved these changes Jul 12, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@andrewsykim andrewsykim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@kevin85421 kevin85421 self-assigned this Jul 12, 2024
kevin85421
kevin85421 reviewed Jul 12, 2024
View reviewed changes
ray-operator/test/e2e/rayjob_retry_test.go Outdated
Should(WithTransform(RayJobFailed, Equal(int32(3)))) // 2 retries + 1 initial attempt = 3 failures
test.Expect(GetRayJob(test, rayJob.Namespace, rayJob.Name)).
Should(WithTransform(RayJobSucceeded, Equal(int32(0))))
test.Expect(GetRayJob(test, rayJob.Namespace, rayJob.Name)).
Copy link
Member

@kevin85421 kevin85421 Jul 12, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems to be redundant. L161 has already checked the reason.

@kevin85421
Copy link
Member

kevin85421 commented Jul 13, 2024

@tinaxfwu can you fix the lint error? It's helpful to install pre-commit https://github.com/ray-project/kuberay/blob/master/ray-operator/DEVELOPMENT.md#pre-commit-hooks.

@tinaxfwu
Copy link
Contributor Author

tinaxfwu commented Jul 13, 2024

@kevin85421 I fixed the lint error, but the buildkite/ray-ecosystem-ci-kuberay-ci/test-raycluster-sample-yamls-latest-release check. I'm not quite sure I understand this issue or how to fix it.

@kevin85421
Copy link
Member

kevin85421 commented Jul 14, 2024

@tinaxfwu the failure is not relevant. It is just a flaky test.

@kevin85421 kevin85421 merged commit 7f15e13 into ray-project:master Jul 14, 2024
@tinaxfwu tinaxfwu deleted the add-httpmode-test branch July 14, 2024 06:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@andrewsykim andrewsykim andrewsykim approved these changes

@kevin85421 kevin85421 kevin85421 approved these changes

Assignees

@kevin85421 kevin85421

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@tinaxfwu @kevin85421 @andrewsykim