Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@binarymist
Copy link

@binarymist binarymist commented Jan 25, 2022

I realised when I was moving my projects from CJS to ESM that sywac is a blocker. I think 55f2ea8 may be all I need in order to move forward unless I hit other problems. ESM can consume CJS without to much fuss, but the other way around introduces a lot more friction, and since sywac consumes the command modules which are now in ESM it becomes a problem.

@nexdrew: What are your plans for migrating sywac to ESM? Are you thinking of:

  • Maintaining both CJS and a new ESM project
  • Just moving to ESM and potentially breaking any consumers apps that wish to upgrade but not also switch to ESM?
  • Something else?

I'd be happy to help with the ESM effort, as I have a production CLI depending on sywac.

Thanks.

@gil0mendes
Copy link

gil0mendes commented Feb 8, 2022

I'm with the same problem as you @binarymist. I wasn't planning moving away from Sywac during the migration 😕

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants