Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@jacobagilbert
Copy link
Member

@jacobagilbert jacobagilbert commented May 27, 2021

Previously sample_count was required, now it is optional to
allow defining spectrally (but not temporally) bounded sigmf
annotations.

Fixes #29

Signed-off-by: Jacob Gilbert [email protected]

Previously  was required, now it is optional to
allow defining spectrally (but not temporally) bounded sigmf
annotations.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Gilbert <[email protected]>
@jacobagilbert jacobagilbert requested review from bhilburn and n-west May 27, 2021 13:58
@jacobagilbert jacobagilbert added clarification a wording change in the spec that clarifies meaning enhancement and removed clarification a wording change in the spec that clarifies meaning labels May 27, 2021
@jacobagilbert jacobagilbert added this to the Release v1.0.0 milestone May 27, 2021
@bhilburn
Copy link
Contributor

bhilburn commented Jun 3, 2021

Nice, @jacobagilbert 👍

@gmabey
Copy link
Contributor

gmabey commented Jun 11, 2021

Seems like a nice feature, and the changes clearly describe it. I would approve it if I could.

@bhilburn
Copy link
Contributor

@gmabey - In the future, you are welcome to just approve via a comment 🙂

@bhilburn bhilburn merged commit d7c1867 into sigmf:master Jun 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Annotate frequency but not time

3 participants