FIX: Formula Dependency Checker Using DFS #34
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…hem, we DFS to find if there is ever a looping dependency and fail only if that happens
YektaY
approved these changes
Sep 4, 2024
zdomke
approved these changes
Sep 4, 2024
YektaY
approved these changes
Sep 4, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Old: Would require formulas to reference rows strictly above them. This is hard to understand from the user perspective, but would make ensuring no recursion very easy.
New: DFS to check dependencies making sure we never reach the original curve again.
To Do: how to handle importing Formulas that are not imported in dependency order?