-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 139
Shift symmetry #183
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Shift symmetry #183
Conversation
Resolve conflicts after force-push
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
|
Just saying, it's probably a good idea to resolve the merge conflicts and merge the current main branch first, since #267 moved around measurmeent functions in mps.py as well, which this PR partially had to update as well. Let me know if you need help with that. |
|
|
|
@phzechm Do you have code for dipole conserving (or other) models using the shift symmetry? |
b0cb3a0 to
a78ec3b
Compare
a78ec3b to
bcaa293
Compare
8051101 to
1fa8d77
Compare
|
Only thing missing now is to adjust the new MPO environment building from #507 . I am happy with doing only the bare minimum to get iDMRG running again and deferring edge cases / clean up to #560. I dont understand the details of the new MPO environment builder, and hopefully we can fix this without me having to understand the details. |
Creating a pull request in an effort to finally merge this.
What's actually missing for this?