Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@hyeonss0417
Copy link
Contributor

@hyeonss0417 hyeonss0417 commented Aug 25, 2023

Changes

  • support config file on programatic usage
  • fix bug that config file options override cli arguments

@hyeonss0417 hyeonss0417 requested a review from Jaechan-So August 25, 2023 15:42
@hyeonss0417 hyeonss0417 self-assigned this Aug 25, 2023
return generateTspecParams;
};

const specGenerator = async (args: RunServerOptions) => {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code review feedback:

  1. Unused Imports: The imports for hideBin and initTspecServer are not used in the code and can be removed.

  2. Redundant Code: The DefaultGenerateParams type is defined but not used anywhere in the code. It can be safely removed.

  3. Improved Parameter Handling: The validateGeneratorOptions function currently returns a partially populated Tspec.GenerateParams object. Instead of checking each parameter individually and assigning its value or undefined, you can simplify the logic by directly assigning the values from args if they differ from their default values. This will make the code cleaner and more maintainable.

  4. Configuration File Check: The condition for checking the availability of a configuration file (isTspecFileConfigAvailable function) and merging its contents (getTspecConfigFromConfigFile function) seems to be commented out. If it's intentional, you can remove this part from the code. Otherwise, uncomment and revise it as needed.

  5. Error Handling: The error handling in validateGeneratorOptions is currently done by throwing an error. Consider using a more structured approach, such as returning an error object, to provide detailed information about the validation failure.

  6. SpecGenerator Function: Consider adding error handling to the specGenerator function to handle any errors that may occur during execution.

These are some general suggestions for improvement based on the code snippet provided. Remember to test the code thoroughly after making any changes or improvements.


const {
openapiSchemas, tspecSymbols,
} = await getOpenapiSchemas(

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on the code patch you provided, here is a brief code review:

  1. Make sure all imported modules and functions are correctly defined and available.

  2. Validate the implementation of isTspecFileConfigAvailable(), getTspecConfigFromConfigFile(), and mergeDeep() functions from the corresponding files as they are not present in the code patch.

  3. Consider adding appropriate error handling and comments in the code for better clarity and maintainability.

  4. In the function defaultGenerateParams, it seems there is an incomplete statement at the end: } satisfies Tspec.GenerateParams;. Please check if this is intentional or requires modification.

  5. The function getGenerateTspecParams merges default parameters with override parameters, using the mergeDeep() function. Ensure that the merging logic is implemented correctly and handles all edge cases.

  6. In the function generateTspec, the parameter name has been changed to generateParams. Update the code accordingly to use the new parameter name consistently.

  7. The function generateTspec calls getGenerateTspecParams() to retrieve the final parameters to be used for generating the Tspec API. Review the implementation of getGenerateTspecParams() to ensure it returns the expected results and handles different scenarios appropriately.

  8. The line const { openapiSchemas, tspecSymbols } = await getOpenapiSchemas( seems incomplete in the code patch. Please provide the complete implementation for a more accurate review.

Overall, without the complete implementation of all the referenced functions, it's challenging to identify potential bugs or suggest improvements. Please provide the complete code, including those missing functions, for a more thorough code review.

configPath?: string,
outputPath?: string,
specVersion?: 3,
openapi?: {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on the code patch you provided, here's a brief code review:

  1. Bug risks:

    • There don't seem to be any apparent bug risks in the code patch. The addition of the configPath property appears to be valid and doesn't introduce any obvious issues.
  2. Improvement suggestions:

    • It would be helpful to provide comments or documentation explaining the purpose and usage of the configPath property.
    • Consider validating and sanitizing the input values for configPath before using them in the code to ensure they meet the expected format or requirements.
    • Consider providing default values for the properties (specPathGlobs, tsconfigPath, outputPath, etc.) if they are not passed as parameters to the GenerateParams function, which can help avoid null or undefined errors when accessing those properties later in the code.

Overall, the code patch seems fine, and the addition of the configPath property appears to be a valid extension to the existing code.

});
}
return output;
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code you provided is a function mergeDeep written in TypeScript. Here's a brief code review:

  1. The code includes a type definition Object, which represents an object with string keys and any values.
  2. The function isObject checks if the provided item is an object (not null, of type 'object', and not an array).
  3. The function mergeDeep takes two parameters: target and source, both of type T and S respectively, where T and S extend the Object type. The function returns a merged object of type T & S.
  4. Inside the mergeDeep function, a shallow copy of the target object is created and assigned to the output variable using the spread operator ({ ...target }).
  5. If both target and source are objects, the code proceeds to iterate over the keys of the source object using Object.keys().
  6. For each key-value pair in source, the code checks if the value is undefined. If so, it skips the current iteration.
  7. If the value is an object, it recursively calls mergeDeep on the corresponding key of the target object and assigns the result to the output object.
  8. If the value is not an object, it assigns the value directly to the output object.
  9. Finally, the output object, which contains the merged values, is returned.

Potential improvement suggestion:

  • The code could benefit from input validation to handle cases where either target or source is not an object. Currently, the code assumes both parameters are objects, and if that's not the case, it will return an incorrect output. Adding validations and appropriate error handling would enhance the robustness of the function.

Bug risk:

  • There don't appear to be any major bugs or risks in the code. However, without more context about the specific use case or expected behavior, it's difficult to provide an exhaustive assessment. It is always advisable to thoroughly test the function with different inputs and corner cases to ensure it behaves as expected.

@hyeonss0417 hyeonss0417 merged commit 753dc41 into main Aug 25, 2023
@hyeonss0417 hyeonss0417 linked an issue Aug 25, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Set Title / Version with Express middleware

2 participants