-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 7
feat: support config file on programatic usage #37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
| return generateTspecParams; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const specGenerator = async (args: RunServerOptions) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review feedback:
-
Unused Imports: The imports for
hideBinandinitTspecServerare not used in the code and can be removed. -
Redundant Code: The
DefaultGenerateParamstype is defined but not used anywhere in the code. It can be safely removed. -
Improved Parameter Handling: The
validateGeneratorOptionsfunction currently returns a partially populatedTspec.GenerateParamsobject. Instead of checking each parameter individually and assigning its value orundefined, you can simplify the logic by directly assigning the values fromargsif they differ from their default values. This will make the code cleaner and more maintainable. -
Configuration File Check: The condition for checking the availability of a configuration file (
isTspecFileConfigAvailablefunction) and merging its contents (getTspecConfigFromConfigFilefunction) seems to be commented out. If it's intentional, you can remove this part from the code. Otherwise, uncomment and revise it as needed. -
Error Handling: The error handling in
validateGeneratorOptionsis currently done by throwing an error. Consider using a more structured approach, such as returning an error object, to provide detailed information about the validation failure. -
SpecGenerator Function: Consider adding error handling to the
specGeneratorfunction to handle any errors that may occur during execution.
These are some general suggestions for improvement based on the code snippet provided. Remember to test the code thoroughly after making any changes or improvements.
|
|
||
| const { | ||
| openapiSchemas, tspecSymbols, | ||
| } = await getOpenapiSchemas( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on the code patch you provided, here is a brief code review:
-
Make sure all imported modules and functions are correctly defined and available.
-
Validate the implementation of
isTspecFileConfigAvailable(),getTspecConfigFromConfigFile(), andmergeDeep()functions from the corresponding files as they are not present in the code patch. -
Consider adding appropriate error handling and comments in the code for better clarity and maintainability.
-
In the function
defaultGenerateParams, it seems there is an incomplete statement at the end:} satisfies Tspec.GenerateParams;. Please check if this is intentional or requires modification. -
The function
getGenerateTspecParamsmerges default parameters with override parameters, using themergeDeep()function. Ensure that the merging logic is implemented correctly and handles all edge cases. -
In the function
generateTspec, the parameter name has been changed togenerateParams. Update the code accordingly to use the new parameter name consistently. -
The function
generateTspeccallsgetGenerateTspecParams()to retrieve the final parameters to be used for generating the Tspec API. Review the implementation ofgetGenerateTspecParams()to ensure it returns the expected results and handles different scenarios appropriately. -
The line
const { openapiSchemas, tspecSymbols } = await getOpenapiSchemas(seems incomplete in the code patch. Please provide the complete implementation for a more accurate review.
Overall, without the complete implementation of all the referenced functions, it's challenging to identify potential bugs or suggest improvements. Please provide the complete code, including those missing functions, for a more thorough code review.
| configPath?: string, | ||
| outputPath?: string, | ||
| specVersion?: 3, | ||
| openapi?: { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on the code patch you provided, here's a brief code review:
-
Bug risks:
- There don't seem to be any apparent bug risks in the code patch. The addition of the
configPathproperty appears to be valid and doesn't introduce any obvious issues.
- There don't seem to be any apparent bug risks in the code patch. The addition of the
-
Improvement suggestions:
- It would be helpful to provide comments or documentation explaining the purpose and usage of the
configPathproperty. - Consider validating and sanitizing the input values for
configPathbefore using them in the code to ensure they meet the expected format or requirements. - Consider providing default values for the properties (
specPathGlobs,tsconfigPath,outputPath, etc.) if they are not passed as parameters to theGenerateParamsfunction, which can help avoid null or undefined errors when accessing those properties later in the code.
- It would be helpful to provide comments or documentation explaining the purpose and usage of the
Overall, the code patch seems fine, and the addition of the configPath property appears to be a valid extension to the existing code.
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| return output; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code you provided is a function mergeDeep written in TypeScript. Here's a brief code review:
- The code includes a type definition
Object, which represents an object with string keys and any values. - The function
isObjectchecks if the provided item is an object (not null, of type 'object', and not an array). - The function
mergeDeeptakes two parameters:targetandsource, both of typeTandSrespectively, whereTandSextend theObjecttype. The function returns a merged object of typeT & S. - Inside the
mergeDeepfunction, a shallow copy of thetargetobject is created and assigned to theoutputvariable using the spread operator ({ ...target }). - If both
targetandsourceare objects, the code proceeds to iterate over the keys of thesourceobject usingObject.keys(). - For each key-value pair in
source, the code checks if the value is undefined. If so, it skips the current iteration. - If the value is an object, it recursively calls
mergeDeepon the corresponding key of thetargetobject and assigns the result to theoutputobject. - If the value is not an object, it assigns the value directly to the
outputobject. - Finally, the
outputobject, which contains the merged values, is returned.
Potential improvement suggestion:
- The code could benefit from input validation to handle cases where either
targetorsourceis not an object. Currently, the code assumes both parameters are objects, and if that's not the case, it will return an incorrect output. Adding validations and appropriate error handling would enhance the robustness of the function.
Bug risk:
- There don't appear to be any major bugs or risks in the code. However, without more context about the specific use case or expected behavior, it's difficult to provide an exhaustive assessment. It is always advisable to thoroughly test the function with different inputs and corner cases to ensure it behaves as expected.
Changes