Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@Youssef1313
Copy link
Member

GitHub Issue: closes #

PR Type:

What is the current behavior? πŸ€”

What is the new behavior? πŸš€

PR Checklist βœ…

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

Other information ℹ️

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 14, 2025 19:28
@github-actions github-actions bot added the area/code-generation Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to code generation label Dec 14, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR attempts to update NuGet package dependencies from deprecated beta versions to stable versions and removes custom package sources. However, the changes introduce compilation issues by switching from framework-specific testing packages to base packages without adding the required MSTest verifier package.

Key Changes:

  • Removes custom Azure DevOps package source references (RestoreAdditionalProjectSources)
  • Updates Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeFix.Testing.MSTest from beta version to base package
  • Updates Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SourceGenerators.Testing.MSTest to base package variant
  • Removes comments explaining the need for the custom package source

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

File Description
src/Uno.Analyzers.Tests/Uno.Analyzers.Tests.csproj Removes custom package source and updates CodeFix.Testing package from MSTest variant to base package
src/SourceGenerators/Uno.UI.SourceGenerators.Tests/Uno.UI.SourceGenerators.Tests.csproj Removes custom package source and updates SourceGenerators.Testing package from MSTest variant to base package

Critical Issues Found:

  1. Missing GitHub issue reference - PR description does not include required issue linking per repository guidelines
  2. Missing MSTest verifier packages - The switch from .MSTest packages to base packages removes the bundled MSTestVerifier type, but no explicit Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Testing.Verifiers.MSTest package reference was added to either project, which will cause compilation failures

@unodevops
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ€– Your WebAssembly Skia Sample App stage site is ready! Visit it here: https://unowasmprstaging.z20.web.core.windows.net/pr-22137/wasm-skia-net9/index.html

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 14, 2025 19:52
@unodevops
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ€– Your Docs stage site is ready! Visit it here: https://unodocsprstaging.z13.web.core.windows.net/pr-22137/docs/index.html

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

@unodevops
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ€– Your WebAssembly Skia Sample App stage site is ready! Visit it here: https://unowasmprstaging.z20.web.core.windows.net/pr-22137/wasm-skia-net9/index.html

@unodevops
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ€– Your Docs stage site is ready! Visit it here: https://unodocsprstaging.z13.web.core.windows.net/pr-22137/docs/index.html

Copy link
Contributor

@ajpinedam ajpinedam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@unodevops
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ€– Your WebAssembly Skia Sample App stage site is ready! Visit it here: https://unowasmprstaging.z20.web.core.windows.net/pr-22137/wasm-skia-net9/index.html

@unodevops
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ€– Your Docs stage site is ready! Visit it here: https://unodocsprstaging.z13.web.core.windows.net/pr-22137/docs/index.html

@unodevops
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️⚠️ The build 188084 has failed on Uno.UI - CI.

@Youssef1313
Copy link
Member Author

@MartinZikmund @ajpinedam This is green now. Can you merge it please? Thanks!

@Youssef1313
Copy link
Member Author

Ping @MartinZikmund @ajpinedam

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/code-generation Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to code generation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants