Merged
Conversation
Gavin-Niederman
requested changes
Oct 30, 2024
| unsafe impl<T: ?Sized + Send> Send for Mutex<T> {} | ||
| unsafe impl<T: ?Sized + Send> Sync for Mutex<T> {} | ||
|
|
||
| impl<T> Mutex<T> { |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you cannot use Mutex::new if T is unsized, how is this relaxed Size bound useful?
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
github kinda threw, the line im talking about is 93
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mutexes can be coerced into an unsized type after creation, delegating the bound on Sized to a wrapper type like Arc. This is useful for trait objects - for example:
use std::sync::*;
use std::any::Any;
fn main() {
let x: Arc<Mutex<dyn Any>> = Arc::new(Mutex::new(3));
}Would avoid the additional heap allocation of an Arc<Mutex<Box<dyn Any>>>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe the changes this PR makes. Why should it be merged?
Makes
TonMutex<T>?Sized, relaxing the requirement thatThave a known size at compile time. This matches the behavior of the standard library.I think this is a breaking change? (although it shouldn't affect the vast majority of people)