Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

@frivoal frivoal commented May 14, 2025

This wording has two goals:

  1. Make it clear that members can be removed for Code of Conduct violations.
  2. Make it clear that minor transgressions are not enough to cause removal.

Relates to #882


This is split from #1036, to facilitate discussion of the various independent aspects of that PR. See https://github.com/w3c/process/pull/1036/files#r2064384283 for prior discussion on this particular aspect.

This PRs is against the ab-tag-discipline topic branch (source, preview), not the main branch, meaning we can iterate and accept individual pieces, and still have a chance at the end to judge the combined result before we decide whether to merge it.


Preview | Diff

…Code of Conduct

This wording has two goals:
1. Make it clear that members can be removed for Code of Conduct violations.
2. Make it clear that minor transgressions are not enough to cause removal.

Relates to w3c#882
index.bs Outdated
Comment on lines 1334 to 1337
or if they are violating policies or other standards of behavior
(such as applicable laws or the <a href="https://www.w3.org/policies/code-of-conduct/#Reporting">Code of Conduct</a>)
in a way that significantly impacts the safety or integrity
of W3C or its community.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is interesting. It sidesteps the issue of how a potential CoC violation should be handled, which reflects the concerns described previously. However, to do that, it adds a new condition "a way that significantly impacts the safety or integrity of W3C or its community", which is likely to be a subjective metric, and is seemingly to be assessed by the individual's peers in their group.

I'm not sure how I feel about that, and welcome the views of others. I'm certainly not instantly comfortable with it.

@frivoal frivoal added this to the Deferred milestone May 19, 2025
@plehegar plehegar removed this from the Deferred milestone Aug 19, 2025
@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

frivoal commented Sep 25, 2025

Merging into the ab-tag-discipline branch, as decided on the 2025-09-24 Process CG call. That branch itself is not being merged into main, and does not represent consensus, merely work in progress.

@frivoal frivoal merged commit 5cedcef into w3c:ab-tag-discipline Sep 25, 2025
2 checks passed
@frivoal frivoal deleted the atd-coc branch September 25, 2025 07:25
@frivoal frivoal added this to the AB/TAG discipline milestone Sep 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants