goldenboy777 marked as non substantive for IPR from ash-nazg.

goldenboy777 marked as substantive for IPR from ash-nazg.

goldenboy777 marked as non substantive for IPR from ash-nazg.

goldenboy777 marked as substantive for IPR from ash-nazg.

@dirkschulze, @caribouW3, @karlcow, can any of you guys review this PR?
I do not have the necessary permission to add reviewers or merge this PR, please help me in knowing what can be done here.

@goldenboy777 I don't have review privileges, but probably @longsonr (Gecko) @shallawa @nikolaszimmermann (WebKit) have comments about the PR.

@caribouW3 @sideshowbarker have the power to merge.

@longsonr @shallawa @nikolaszimmermann, can you guys review this PR if possible?

@caribouW3 @sideshowbarker can any of you help me in adding reviewers or merging this PR?

Hi,
It does not look like spec prose.
What should go into the spec is only the sentence in the Resolution part. The other info should go into the original issue in GH.
I wonder if it could also include an exhaustive list of the content-dependent units.

Hi, It does not look like spec prose. What should go into the spec is only the sentence in the Resolution part. The other info should go into the original issue in GH. I wonder if it could also include an exhaustive list of the content-dependent units.

@caribouW3, I added the sentence as you suggested. Let me know if more work needed to be done.

content-dependent keywords was a term that I coined to make the discussion easier, there is no CSS spec which mention that as is, but this spec https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-3/#propdef-width list the properties which width CSS property can take among them are the listed min-content, max-content, fit-content and calc-size which are dependent on CSS box model.
This in my opinion are the units where ambiguity was for SVG elements, so I have listed them, let me know your thought here.

@caribouW3 @dirkschulze any updates for this PR? Let me know if it's ok to merge this PR?