Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@MetRonnie
Copy link

I think this plays nicer. I don't think there is a need to have satisfied by X mode where X is not "skip".

@MetRonnie MetRonnie mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2024
8 tasks
Comment on lines -107 to -111
DEP_STATE_SATISFIED: SatisfiedState = 'satisfied naturally'
DEP_STATE_SATISFIED_BY = 'satisfied by {} mode'
DEP_STATE_OVERRIDDEN = 'force satisfied'
DEP_STATE_UNSATISFIED = False
SATISFIED_MODE_RE = re.compile(r'satisfied by .* mode')
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Most of these unused, some re-added after being removed in cylc#6293

@wxtim wxtim force-pushed the feature.skip_mode branch 2 times, most recently from 2aa3f1c to 51f6585 Compare October 31, 2024 14:45
@wxtim wxtim merged commit f9e8a83 into wxtim:feature.skip_mode Nov 5, 2024
25 of 26 checks passed
@MetRonnie MetRonnie deleted the skip-mode-prereq branch November 5, 2024 14:32
wxtim pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants