Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Dec 12, 2025

The checkout service always failed with CheckoutServiceTimeoutError regardless of payment gateway responsiveness. Now implements proper timeout handling that succeeds under normal conditions and only fails on actual timeouts.

Changes

  • Added timeout configuration via environment variables:

    • PAYMENT_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT (default: 5000ms) - maximum wait time for gateway response
    • PAYMENT_GATEWAY_RESPONSE_TIME (default: 2000ms) - simulated gateway latency
  • Implemented processPayment() function with Promise-based timeout handling:

    async function processPayment(email, movieId, price) {
      return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        const timeout = setTimeout(() => {
          reject(new Error('Payment gateway did not respond in time'));
        }, PAYMENT_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT);
    
        setTimeout(() => {
          clearTimeout(timeout);
          resolve({
            success: true,
            transactionId: `txn_${Date.now()}_${Math.random().toString(36).substr(2, 9)}`,
            email, movieId, price,
          });
        }, PAYMENT_GATEWAY_RESPONSE_TIME);
      });
    }
  • Updated /api/checkout endpoint to return 200 on success, 500 only on actual timeout

  • Added configuration documentation in .env.example and README

Timeout errors can still be simulated by setting PAYMENT_GATEWAY_RESPONSE_TIME > PAYMENT_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT.

Original prompt

This section details on the original issue you should resolve

<issue_title>CheckoutServiceTimeoutError: Payment gateway did not respond in time</issue_title>
<issue_description>A CheckoutServiceTimeoutError occurred in the checkout-service on the nightowl-tickets project in the development environment. The payment gateway did not respond in time. Please investigate the payment gateway's responsiveness and the checkout-service's timeout settings. The error was triggered at 2025-12-12T02:15:54.663Z. The request data included email: [email protected], movieId: neon-midnight, and price: 24.</issue_description>

Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Payment processing now includes configurable timeout handling for payment gateway responses with improved error messaging
  • Documentation

    • Updated API documentation with configuration guidance, response examples, and instructions for simulating payment gateway timeout scenarios

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Copilot AI assigned Copilot and wei Dec 12, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The changes introduce payment gateway timeout simulation to the NightOwl checkout service. Two environment variables control timeout duration and simulated response time. The /api/checkout endpoint now handles timeout scenarios with structured error responses and webhook alerting.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Configuration
NightOwl/.env.example
Added PAYMENT_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT and PAYMENT_GATEWAY_RESPONSE_TIME environment variables with comments explaining timeout simulation behavior.
Documentation
NightOwl/README.md
Updated POST /api/checkout API documentation with configurable timeout mechanics, success/error response examples, and configuration guidance for timeout simulation.
Core Implementation
NightOwl/server/index.js
Introduced processPayment() function to simulate timed payment gateway calls; refactored /api/checkout handler to use processPayment with try/catch, structured error handling, and webhook alerting for timeout scenarios; added startup logging for timeout configuration.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant Server as Checkout Handler
    participant PaymentGateway as Payment Gateway<br/>(Simulated)
    participant WebhookService as Webhook Service
    
    Client->>Server: POST /api/checkout<br/>(email, movieId, price)
    Server->>PaymentGateway: processPayment()
    
    alt Response within timeout
        PaymentGateway-->>Server: Success with<br/>transactionId
        Server->>Client: 200 OK<br/>{transactionId, message}
    else Response exceeds timeout
        PaymentGateway-->>Server: Timeout Error
        Server->>WebhookService: sendAlert()<br/>(CheckoutServiceTimeoutError)
        WebhookService-->>Server: Alert sent
        Server->>Client: 500 Error<br/>{service, code, message}
    end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

  • Timeout simulation logic: Verify the Promise-based timeout mechanism in processPayment() correctly rejects after PAYMENT_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT
  • Error handling path: Ensure CheckoutServiceTimeoutError construction and logging align with broader error handling patterns
  • Webhook integration: Confirm sendAlert() is called consistently and webhook payload format is correct
  • Environment variable defaults: Review fallback values and ensure they're reasonable for development/production scenarios

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop! A timeout's tracked with care,
No silent fails left in the air,
Gateway delays now caught with grace,
Webhook alerts keep up the pace!
Configuration blooms, logs shine bright,
Payment flows smooth as a moonlit night. 🌙

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately summarizes the main change: adding configurable timeout handling to the checkout service, which is the core focus of the PR.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The PR successfully addresses issue #3 by implementing proper timeout handling with configurable settings (PAYMENT_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT and PAYMENT_GATEWAY_RESPONSE_TIME) so normal responses succeed and only real timeouts fail.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed All changes are directly related to fixing the timeout handling issue: environment variables, processPayment function, checkout endpoint modifications, and documentation updates are all in scope.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Fix CheckoutServiceTimeoutError in checkout-service Add configurable timeout handling to checkout service Dec 12, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from wei December 12, 2025 02:31
@wei
Copy link
Owner

wei commented Dec 12, 2025

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
NightOwl/server/index.js (1)

105-124: Minor: Response timer continues running after timeout rejection.

When PAYMENT_GATEWAY_RESPONSE_TIME > PAYMENT_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT, the timeout fires and rejects the promise, but the response timer continues running in the background. While JavaScript ignores the subsequent resolve() call (promises settle only once), the timer keeps running unnecessarily.

For proper cleanup, consider clearing both timers:

 async function processPayment(email, movieId, price) {
   return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
+    let responseTimer;
     const timeout = setTimeout(() => {
+      clearTimeout(responseTimer);
       reject(new Error('Payment gateway did not respond in time'));
     }, PAYMENT_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT);
 
     // Simulate payment processing
-    setTimeout(() => {
+    responseTimer = setTimeout(() => {
       clearTimeout(timeout);
       resolve({
         success: true,
         transactionId: `txn_${Date.now()}_${Math.random().toString(36).substr(2, 9)}`,
         email,
         movieId,
         price,
       });
     }, PAYMENT_GATEWAY_RESPONSE_TIME);
   });
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b9ee54 and 340f499.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • NightOwl/.env.example (1 hunks)
  • NightOwl/README.md (2 hunks)
  • NightOwl/server/index.js (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 dotenv-linter (4.0.0)
NightOwl/.env.example

[warning] 10-10: [UnorderedKey] The PAYMENT_GATEWAY_RESPONSE_TIME key should go before the PAYMENT_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT key

(UnorderedKey)

🔇 Additional comments (6)
NightOwl/README.md (2)

58-73: LGTM! Clear configuration documentation.

The new Configuration section properly documents all environment variables with their defaults and purposes. The guidance for copying .env.example is helpful for new developers.


78-113: LGTM! API documentation accurately reflects the implementation.

The updated endpoint documentation clearly explains the timeout simulation behavior, configuration options, and provides accurate request/response examples that match the server implementation.

NightOwl/.env.example (1)

5-10: LGTM! Well-documented configuration.

The environment variables are properly documented with clear comments explaining their purpose and how to simulate timeouts. The current ordering (TIMEOUT before RESPONSE_TIME) is more intuitive than alphabetical ordering since it presents the constraint before the simulated value.

NightOwl/server/index.js (3)

10-11: LGTM! Proper environment variable parsing.

Good use of parseInt with explicit radix and sensible defaults.


126-175: LGTM! Proper timeout handling implementation.

The checkout handler correctly:

  • Awaits processPayment with proper try/catch
  • Returns 200 with transaction details on success
  • Creates structured error with stack trace on timeout
  • Sends webhook alert for monitoring
  • Returns 500 with error details on failure

This properly fixes the original issue where checkout always failed with CheckoutServiceTimeoutError.


209-210: LGTM! Helpful startup logs.

Logging the configured timeout values at startup aids operational visibility and helps verify environment configuration.

@wei wei marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2025 03:14
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 12, 2025 03:14
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR fixes the checkout service that was always failing with timeout errors. It introduces configurable timeout handling that allows the payment gateway simulation to succeed under normal conditions while still being able to simulate timeout scenarios through configuration.

Key Changes:

  • Implemented a processPayment() function with Promise-based timeout logic that simulates payment gateway interaction
  • Added configurable timeout parameters via environment variables (PAYMENT_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT and PAYMENT_GATEWAY_RESPONSE_TIME)
  • Modified /api/checkout endpoint to return success (200) when payment completes within timeout, error (500) only on actual timeouts

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.

File Description
NightOwl/server/index.js Added timeout configuration constants, implemented processPayment() function with race-based timeout logic, and wrapped checkout endpoint in try-catch to handle success and timeout cases differently
NightOwl/README.md Added configuration section documenting new environment variables, updated API endpoint documentation with success/error response examples and timeout simulation instructions
NightOwl/.env.example Added payment gateway configuration variables with descriptive comments explaining timeout simulation behavior

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +106 to +124
async function processPayment(email, movieId, price) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
const timeout = setTimeout(() => {
reject(new Error('Payment gateway did not respond in time'));
}, PAYMENT_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT);

// Simulate payment processing
setTimeout(() => {
clearTimeout(timeout);
resolve({
success: true,
transactionId: `txn_${Date.now()}_${Math.random().toString(36).substr(2, 9)}`,
email,
movieId,
price,
});
}, PAYMENT_GATEWAY_RESPONSE_TIME);
});
}
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 12, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The timeout timer is not cleared when it fires, creating a resource leak. When the timeout rejects the promise on line 109, the response timer on line 113 is still scheduled and will eventually execute line 114 (clearTimeout(timeout)), but by then the promise has already been rejected. If the timeout fires, you should also clear the response timer to prevent unnecessary work and ensure clean resource cleanup.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +148 to +149
const timeoutError = new Error("CheckoutServiceTimeoutError: Payment gateway did not respond in time");
timeoutError.name = "CheckoutServiceTimeoutError";
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 12, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Creating a new error object here discards the original error and its stack trace from processPayment(). The original error's stack trace would show where the timeout actually occurred, which is valuable for debugging. Consider using the caught error directly or at least preserving its stack trace information.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
clearTimeout(timeout);
resolve({
success: true,
transactionId: `txn_${Date.now()}_${Math.random().toString(36).substr(2, 9)}`,
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 12, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The substr() method is deprecated. Use substring() or slice() instead. For this use case, slice(2, 11) would be the appropriate replacement.

Suggested change
transactionId: `txn_${Date.now()}_${Math.random().toString(36).substr(2, 9)}`,
transactionId: `txn_${Date.now()}_${Math.random().toString(36).slice(2, 11)}`,

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

app.post('/api/checkout', async (req, res) => {
const { email, movieId, price } = req.body;

Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 12, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The endpoint lacks input validation for the request body parameters. Missing or invalid values for email, movieId, or price could lead to unexpected behavior or errors in downstream processing. Consider adding validation to ensure these parameters are present and have the expected types before processing the payment.

Suggested change
// Input validation
const emailRegex = /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/;
if (
typeof email !== 'string' || !emailRegex.test(email) ||
typeof movieId !== 'string' || movieId.trim() === '' ||
typeof price !== 'number' || !isFinite(price) || price <= 0
) {
return res.status(400).json({
status: "error",
service: "checkout-service",
code: "InvalidRequest",
message: "Invalid or missing parameters: email, movieId, and price are required and must be valid."
});
}

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +10 to 12
const PAYMENT_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT = parseInt(process.env.PAYMENT_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT || '5000', 10); // Default 5 seconds
const PAYMENT_GATEWAY_RESPONSE_TIME = parseInt(process.env.PAYMENT_GATEWAY_RESPONSE_TIME || '2000', 10); // Simulated response time

Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 12, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The parseInt() calls don't validate that the parsed values are positive numbers. If someone sets these environment variables to negative values or zero, it could cause unexpected behavior in the timeout logic. Consider adding validation to ensure these values are positive integers.

Suggested change
const PAYMENT_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT = parseInt(process.env.PAYMENT_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT || '5000', 10); // Default 5 seconds
const PAYMENT_GATEWAY_RESPONSE_TIME = parseInt(process.env.PAYMENT_GATEWAY_RESPONSE_TIME || '2000', 10); // Simulated response time
// Helper to parse and validate positive integer environment variables
function getPositiveIntEnv(varName, defaultValue) {
const value = parseInt(process.env[varName], 10);
if (Number.isInteger(value) && value > 0) {
return value;
}
return defaultValue;
}
const PAYMENT_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT = getPositiveIntEnv('PAYMENT_GATEWAY_TIMEOUT', 5000); // Default 5 seconds
const PAYMENT_GATEWAY_RESPONSE_TIME = getPositiveIntEnv('PAYMENT_GATEWAY_RESPONSE_TIME', 2000); // Simulated response time

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CheckoutServiceTimeoutError: Payment gateway did not respond in time

2 participants