Editorial: Use the term "author request headers" consistently #354
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
I think this is actually fine and instead we should reword
to something like:
"author request headers" is an internal field of |
Author
|
I wasn't aware of the possible distinct treatment of informative text. In that case, I agree that your suggestion is much clearer than talking about "author" request headers. |
annevk
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2022
annevk
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The spec uses the term "author request headers" everywhere except in the description of the
OPENEDstate in https://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/#states. This commit fixes this inconsistency.I think this qualifies as an Editorial change, but I am unsure. Please advise is this is incorrect.
(See WHATWG Working Mode: Changes for more details.)
Preview | Diff